On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:13, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It looks like this is the case, I had hoped that the incompatibilities
> > were minor enough that it would be possible to add any missing APIs back
> > in where necessary.
>
> Ah; that's potentially an option as well -- it's your call as t
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 06:14, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:29:55PM -0500, Ming Hua wrote:
> > So from my understanding, it's urgent for libfreetype6 to bump its
> > shlibs from "libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1)" to "libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.10-1)".
>
> No. See bug #314385: this librar
2 matches
Mail list logo
