Bug#579690: transition: KDE SC 4.4.3

> Hi, the sip packages have been updated recently to better support binNMU on ABI breakages by new sip versions (which happen quite frequently). I've sent instructions on how to port packages to the new dependency scheme to the maintainers of all of sip's rdepends, but probably

Please binNMU qscintilla2

Hi, qscintilla2 needs to be rebuild against the latest python-qt4 (except on amd64): please schedule the following binNMU: nmu qscintilla2_2.4.3-1 . ALL -amd64 -m 'Rebuild against PyQt 4.7.3' best, Torsten -- .: Torsten Marek .: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net .: tors...@diot

Re: Ongoing Python Transition: related FTBFSes

python-sip4), since sip 4.10 introduces a new ABI, again. However, dependencies of sip-based packages are now on the virtual sip-abi-x.y (currently, 7.0) packages, which is provided by python-sip and can be added to a package's dependencies via ${sip:Depends} and dh_sip. python-qt{3,4} and qscintilla2 in experimental already use this. best, Torsten -- .: Torsten Marek .: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net .: tors...@diotavelli.net -- GnuPG: 1024D/A244C858 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

QScintilla 2.4-5 upload

udio_1.8.4.0~beta1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libqscintilla2-5" kscope_1.9.4-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libqscintilla2-5" TIA, Torsten -- .: Torsten Marek .: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net .: tors...@diotavelli.net -- GnuPG: 1024D/A244C858 signature.asc Desc

binNMUs for new QScintilla2

ora_2.0.0-3 . * . -m 'Rebuild against QScintilla 2.3.2' dw universalindentgui_0.8.1-1.2 kscope_1.9.2-1 tora_2.0.0-3 . ALL -amd64 . -m 'libqscintilla2-5 (>= 2.3.2-1.1)' Thanks! Torsten -- .: Torsten Marek .: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net .: tors...@diotavelli.net -- GnuPG:

qscintilla2 transition

could schedule it. best, Torsten -- .: Torsten Marek .: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net .: tors...@diotavelli.net -- GnuPG: 1024D/A244C858 signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: Please unblock pyopengl 3.0.0~b6

.3 was installed, which was > not shipped with Etch AFAICS. So, albeit Python-Version is strictly not > correct, it is good enough since stable. > > Thoughts? > Hi, I'll fix it in the next upload. Whether or not this is an RC depends on how many systems still have python2.3 inst

Re: The status of pyopengl

package is rather small anyway. best, Torsten -- .: Torsten Marek .: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net .: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- GnuPG: 1024D/A244C858 signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: The status of pyopengl

Hi, well, the changes are minimal and they don't affect anything else apart from the usability of applications *using* python-opengl, so I don't see why not. I could also package the new release, beta6. best, Torsten -- .: Torsten Marek .: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net .: [EMAIL