Teodor wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >> I can confirm that the package builds fine, started a build yesterday
> >> on a mipsel box I have access to. I did build it in an uptodate unstable
> >> cow
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Teodor [2008-12-23 11:53:04 CET]:
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:45 AM, John Goerzen
> > wrote:
> > > Luk Claes wrote:
> > >> unblocked
> > >
> > > Even better -- thanks!
> >
> > Luk, thanks for the unblock. Unfortunately 'bacula' cannot migrate due
> > to a build fail
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:12:36PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
> >>
> >
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
>
> >Package failed to buid on alpha and mipsel, is this something you would
> >know something about?
> >
> > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/
Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2008 04:06:20 Luca Bruno wrote:
> > if the release team
> > really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to
> > the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick
> > NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probab
Please unblock python2.4 2.4.5-5.2. It fixes those bugs:
#498857 - readline.so is dynamically linked to GNU Readline which is GPL
#500383 - Python is broken on mips/mipsel, alpha, sparc, hppa
A similiar patch is already in lenny with python2.5.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix cffi NULL pointer dereferencing. (Closes: #503255)
+
+ -- Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:06:48 +0100
+
sbcl (1:1.0.18.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. Major changes:
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- sbcl-1.0.18.
severity 500418 serious
thanks
Mark Purcell wrote:
> severity 500418 important
> thanks
>
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > severity 500418 serious
> [...]
> > Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control.
Please give back:
gb screem . mips
gb revelation . mips mipsel
and set to dep-wait for a fixed boost bug (#503572):
dw gnash . arm armel hppa mipsel . -m 'libboost-dev (>= 1.34.1-12)'
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Luca Capello wrote:
> tags 503255 + upstream
> tags 503255 + patch
> tags 503255 + fixed-upstream
> thanks
>
> Hi David!
>
> Since Thiemo Seufer did the last SBCL upload, I now directly cc:ed him
> to be sure he reads this message.
>
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please add the following dep-waits:
>
> Done.
Sorry, the line for mplayer was incorrect, it now needs:
dw mplayer . arm armel mips mipsel powerpc s390 . -m 'libcaca0 (>=
0.99.b
Please add the following dep-waits:
dw gnome-utils . alpha mipsel . -m 'libgnomeprintui2.2-0 (>= 2.18.3-1)'
dw ruby-gnome2 . hppa mipsel . -m 'libgnomeprintui2.2-0 (>= 2.18.3-1)'
dw music-applet . alpha hppa mips mipsel powerpc s390 . -m
'libgnomeprintui2.2-0 (>= 2.18.3-1)'
dw mplayer . arm armel
peter green wrote:
> When I look at I see there is nothing currently in the building state
> and 9 packages in the needs build state 7 of which have been in that
> state more than a week.
>
> Is there a problem with the buildd?
It was a stuck buildd, now fixed (the packages are already built).
Please allow python2.5 2.5.2-11.1 in lenny. It fixes
#498477: Documentation update for readline.so/_ssl.so licensing
#499132: Add separate Linux platforms for alpha, hppa, mips, mipsel, sparc
The patch for #499132 is smaller than it looks, each platform is largely
copied from the general Linux ve
Please give back the following packages:
gb quantlib-swig . mipsel # Maybe fixed by python2.5 mips platform
gb flumotion . mips mipsel # Fixed python2.5
gb g-wrap . hppa mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc # Likely fixed guile bug
gb kdebindings . mipsel # python segfault, probably fixed
gb r-base . al
The mipsel buildd mayer apparently had a hiccup some 3 days ago and
left a number of packages in state "Building" an "Maybe successful"
(according to
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/architecture.php?suite=unstable&a=mipsel).
Please give back the following packages:
gb xserver-xorg-input-m
Please give-back flumotion, it should build now since #449341 is fixed.
gb flumotion . hppa mips mipsel
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please give back:
gb zero-icee . mips
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please give back the following packages, they should build now.
(I don't know what the story for vlc on sparc is.)
gb funguloids . arm mips mipsel powerpc
gb vlc . mips sparc # sparc is "failed", no reason given
gb gpsdrive . alpha armel mips mipsel powerpc
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
The following packages should build now:
gb universalindentgui . mips mipsel powerpc
gb spass . mipsel
gb cycfx2prog . mipsel
gb rkward . mips mipsel
gb mlt++ . mipsel
gb python-kde4 . mipsel
gb ivtools . mipsel
gb advi . alpha mipsel
gb freetennis . alpha mipsel
gb robotour . mipsel powerpc
gb ex
Please give baack the following packages, they should build now:
gb gpivtools . arm i386 mips mipsel
gb bind9 . arm hppa ia64 mips mipsel
gb anjuta . arm mips mipsel
gb openvrml . armel i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Please give back the following packages, they should build now.
(sparc marked ktechlab as "failed", I don't know why.)
gb lilypond . mipsel
gb gwenview . mips
gb streamtuner . alpha i386 mips mipsel powerpc
gb sonata . mips
gb python-gtkglext1 . mips
gb vdr-plugin-skinenigmang . mips
gb lxde-commo
hildon-desktop has a bogus Dep-Wait on mipsel (due to a typo), please
clear it.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Those should build now:
gb gst-plugins-bad0.10 . mips mipsel
gb gpsim . mipsel
gb ktoon . mipsel
gb libhildonhelp . mipsel
gb lilypond . mipsel
gb qtads . mipsel
gb ristretto . mipsel
gb sketch . mipsel
gb xfce4-notes-plugin . mipsel
gb libraw1394 . alpha mips mipsel sparc
gb comedilib . alpha mip
Some fallout from an missing libpopt-dev, those should build now:
gb gcj-4.3 . mips mipsel
gb devhelp . mips mipsel
gb ipvsadm . armel mips mipsel powerpc
gb mcs . mips mipsel powerpc
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
[snip]
> > Actually, I can't reproduce this on ion, which is my debian testing
> > build box. The only difference from a normal testing system is that
> > it's running 2.6.26-rc1 (it's also a pa8800 which makes its coherency a
> > bit more stringent). Building python 2.5.2-
Please give back the following packages, they should build now:
gb esniper . alpha mips mipsel powerpc
gb darcs . alpha mips mipsel powerpc
gb mapserver . alpha mips mipsel powerpc
gb citadel . alpha mips mipsel powerpc
gb ahven . mips
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 08:28:13AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Please give back the following packages, they should build now:
>
> Done, except for xfce-notes-plugin, which was not found. Please specify
> the give-backs as "gb . " (arch
Please give back the following packages, they should build now:
adabrowse # (mips mipsel)
ale # (alpha mips mipsel powerpc)
autogen # (alpha mips mipsel powerpc)
bouml # (alpha mips mipsel powerpc)
devhelp # (alpha mips mipsel)
facturalux # (alpha m
Please give back the following packages, they should build now.
ktoon # (mips mipsel)
sailcut # (mips mipsel powerpc)
psi # (mips)
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These four packages currently fail to build on mips (and others):
-- contrib packages which b-d on non-free packages --
motv# needs libmotif-dev, orphaned, #379256
suitesparse-metis # needs libparmetis-dev, RC bug #478179
octave-gpc # needs libgpcl-dev
sivp# needs scil
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 13:48:02 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > bin-prot# (arm mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on
> > libtype-conv-camlp4-dev]
> > sexplib310 # (arm hppa ia64 mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on
> > libtype-
Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:40:14AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >
> > Here is a small overview of the ghc6 related packages.
>
> I'm a bit confused - is this meant to be a complete list?
> It doesn't mention, e.g., haskell-cgi on powerpc, which AFAICS has all
> its deps sa
Please give back the following packages, they should build now:
libhildonhelp # (mipsel)
hildon-desktop # [mipsel needs dep-wait on libhildonhelp0]
bin-prot# (arm mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on libtype-conv-camlp4-dev]
sexplib310 # (arm hppa ia64 mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on
l
Luk Claes wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Please give back those haskell-related packages, they should build now.
> >
> > lhs2tex # (mips mipsel powerpc)
> > haskelldb-hsql-mysql # (hppa mips mipsel)
> > haskelldb-hsql-odbc # (arm mips mipsel)
> >
Please give back the following packages, they should build now:
openarena # (mips)
pandoc # (mips mipsel powerpc)
mozart # (hppa mips mipsel powerpc)
mlt # (mips mipsel)
music-applet# (mips mipsel powerpc)
edenmath.app# (mips powerpc)
vdr-plugin-live # (
Please give back those haskell-related packages, they should build now.
lhs2tex # (mips mipsel powerpc)
haskelldb-hsql-mysql # (hppa mips mipsel)
haskelldb-hsql-odbc # (arm mips mipsel)
haskelldb-hsql-postgresql # (hppa mips mipsel)
haskelldb-hsql-sqlite3 # (hppa mips mipsel)
arch2darcs
Please give back the following packages, their formerly missing
build dependencies are now available:
illuminator # (arm mips mipsel)
libgdal-grass # (mips mipsel powerpc)
hplip # (mips mipsel)
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
The following milter-related packages failed on mips and mipsel
due to a missing build dependency which is now available:
dk-milter
milter-greylist
spamass-milter
spfmilter
Please re-try those packages.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
With #453903 fixed, some packages need to be rescheduled, I
presume via a Dep-Wait on ghostscript (>= 8.62.dfsg.1-2.1):
slony1 # (hppa, sparc)
frown # (hppa, sparc)
ifhp# (hppa, sparc)
sbcl# (sparc)
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
The following packages failed to build and are likely to succeed
when re-tried:
usepackage # failure not reproducible, (mips mipsel)
hildon-thumbnail # (mipsel)
libhildonfm # (mips) [mipsel needs dep-wait on hildon-thumbnail]
hildon-desktop # (sparc) [mips mipsel need dep-wait on libhild
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > would be cool if someone could give-back lyx-1.5.4-2 on mips and powerpc so
> > that
> > lyx can hopefully migrate to testing in the next days.
>
> Why do you expect the builds to succeed this time?
For mips it failure
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-05-05, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please BinNMU kde4libs for mips and mipsel. The current version was
> > built with the broken Qt ABI (see also #451046). One symptom of this
> > is a FTBFS of kdebase-runtime.
>
Please BinNMU kde4libs for mips and mipsel. The current version was
built with the broken Qt ABI (see also #451046). One symptom of this
is a FTBFS of kdebase-runtime.
I did a test re-build of kde4libs locally on mips, this solved the
problem and eventually allowed me to build kdebase-runtime.
T
Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 11:20:50PM -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> > the package wengophone started failing build on arm architecture because
> > of an internal compiler error of gcc.
>
> This is due to gcc-4.3 bug #476460. You can workaround it by a) not
> using -funroll-loo
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a few days ago we had a discussion on IRC about numerous problems created
> by a change in dpkg-dev:
> - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465282
> -
> http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commit;h=a143d3b44001f328453e0b71d272e06eb60903fa
>
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:41:53PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > Now that xerces27 is installed on both them, could you please
> > give back libgdal-grass? Qgis is waiting for that and it is out
> > of testing since 78 days. Thanks.
> >
>
> Now 81 days :
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [CC'd to debian-mips.]
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at
dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:05:12PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > hello stable rm,
> >
> > could you please review #438123 ?
> > the fix propagated in new upstream and is thus in testing / sid.
> > the consequences are that currently nfsroot on mips/mipsel fails.
> >
>
Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
> I find four packages in the archive that are picking up a dependency on
> 'binutils' by way of shlibs: ggcov, nitpic, skyeye, and sysprof.
>
> nitpic needs libbfd-2.16.91.so, that's nice...
>
> ggcov, sysprof, and skyeye at least manage to have binary packages in st
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > > miss another backport from the trunk.
>
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we
> > > need to do to get back in and release
Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> On 2007-03-09 15:40 +0100, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > Please keep in mind that GNU/Linux distributors usually distribute a
> > _stable_ version that is intended to be unchanged
>
> Ion3 is _not stable_, yet. So-called "stable" distributions should
> not include unstable softw
Christian Perrier wrote:
> This 2nd NMU in a row for that package, which I uploaded a few seconds
> ago, fixes all the pending debconf l10n bugs. I guess it therefore
> qualifies for being unblocked.
Thank you for handling this, btw.
Thiemo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:57:00PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:48:32PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > > > As a result, the bts is already ignoring m68k in calculating a bug's
> > > > applicability for the testing distribution, at the release team
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[snip]
> http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing is grossly out-of-date, but I
> will integrate the relevant information from that in the process.
KernelFirmwareLicensing is supposed to track information about
mis-licensed firmware. IIRC you mentioned to have found a
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 04:53:51PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > No, because those are not linked together with the GPLed code, but are
> > > > a mere
> > > > aggregation of works inside the same media, i
maximilian attems wrote:
[snip]
> > No, it is not. As you may have noticed, we had a release update a few
> > days ago, telling people that we're currently planning to release with
> > 2.6.17. Though we're aware that it might be needed to update the kernel
> > in October, the current upstream relea
Jason Self wrote:
[snip]
> Please see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/07/msg00188.html
>
> And, as Brian Durant pointed out, this isn't just about the iMac G5
> but also the Power Mac G5 (PowerMac 9.1) as well. In fact, Debian
> chokes on most of Apple's newer PowerPC machines. I and
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:06:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > It's not even RC at all, just a badly configured buildd. They should
> > > be using linux32.
> >
> > No, it is con
Mike Hommey wrote:
[snip]
> The problem here is that the buildd in question is running a 64bit
> kernel while building 32bit binaries. The same problem would happen if
> building i386 binaries on amd64 buildds. Now my question is: could these
> bugs be treated ignore-etch ? It's indeed RC, but is i
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Hi Thiemo!
> >
> > Thiemo Seufer [2006-07-16 21:42 +0100]:
> > > > FWIW, I tried a build with today's unstable on mips, after enabling
> > > > the server pack
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi Thiemo!
>
> Thiemo Seufer [2006-07-16 21:42 +0100]:
> > > FWIW, I tried a build with today's unstable on mips, after enabling
> > > the server packages again. There was one failure in the testsuite:
> > >
> > >
> >
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Hi Debian release team,
> >
> > according to [1] postgresql-7.4 has recently been blocked to go into
> > testing. However, the current testing version is months old and has
> > open security holes, so it is cruci
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi Debian release team,
>
> according to [1] postgresql-7.4 has recently been blocked to go into
> testing. However, the current testing version is months old and has
> open security holes, so it is crucial that Etch is not released with
> 7.4.9.
>
> The reason for not going
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-04 11:24]:
> >> - installer support weak - 2.4 only currently, but this is not enough
> >> if we drop the 2.4 kernels
> >
> > I think they have switched to 2.6 in the mean
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060429 12:36]:
> > > Or, a totally different idea: Why do we (technically) need to
> > > rebuild the installer at all? Could we try to avoid that need in
> > > future?
>
> > The main reason (AIUI) we want to have a new installer with new ker
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:04:53PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > waldi why not add your patch to update-grub to the next stable release?
>
> Please keep in mind that you can't rely on a current sarge installation
> when it is upgraded to etc
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:38:27AM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
[snip]
> Since sarge carry 2.6.8 kernels we could add to the release note to first
> upgrade the kernel to 2.6.8 before the upgrade, but that assume the
> sarge 2.6 kernel will handle their hardware (which is probable if sarge
> 2.4.27
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 05:34:26PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
[snip]
> - I have a chain of 3 dependecies (libtagcoll -> libapt-front ->
>debtags) that would require me to rebuild the mirror for pbuilder
>every time I compile one of them, and I still haven't figured out how
>to do it aut
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> >Actually, there is one criterion missing: Does this bug really hurt us
> >bad (enough)? And my current answer to this is no, but of course, you
> >might want to persuade me. :)
> ...
>
> >So, I think we can say that this bug is even forwarded to up
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051007 04:42]:
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > If
> > > you think, that availability of compilers on some architectures
> > > should be release criterium, please bring that up with the release
> > > team first.
> > That's not
time (less than a year)
> should be a requirement for a port to be considered.
>
> Does the release team agree or disagree?
>
> According to Thiemo Seufer, MIPS has failed this criterion.
You are mistaken (since I'm also upstream). I notice you seem to
triage pre-sarge b
Roger Leigh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050619 22:17]:
>
> >> Things are much less likely to heat if you present them
> >> properly.
> >
> > Ok, convinced. No more minutes to
Michael Schultheiss wrote:
> Is there anything holding python2.4 2.4.1-1 from entering sarge other
> than the mips build? I can't find any reason why it hasn't been built
> for mips yet either. I've already e-mailed -mips but haven't yet heard
> what the holdup is.
It is listed as building since
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> As many of you may know on some machines users will need to install
> a current kernel before they will be able to upgrade woody to sarge
> (or better: glibc of woody to glibc of sarge). I've tried to use the
> available information to provide the needed file
Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 05:58:05PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I've added packages to the base freeze that produce udebs in addition to
> > debs. This is to avoid propigation of udeb sources to testing if the d-i
> > release schedule does not allow the udeb to also propigate
[M-f-t set, I think this is offtopic for -release.]
Matthew Palmer wrote:
[snip]
> > > Common sense would suggest that tests that have to be analysed by a human
> > > being after every test run aren't particularly useful.
> >
> > Actually, skimming over the dozen or so failing ones, and recognizi
Matthew Palmer wrote:
[snip]
> > > So what are the tests useful for, then? They're obviously useless as a
> > > gauge of quality, because failing tests apparently don't indicate a flaw
> > > in
> > > the software.
> >
> > A little common sense, please? The test results have to be interpreted
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i'm one of the maintainers for quik. Peter De Schrijver is the other
> one. as you may well know, quik is in base and priority important, and
> base is frozen.
I don't think so. Frozen is what debootstrap installs. It stopped
installing bootloaders a while ag
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Karsten Merker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041109 19:35]:
> > > I can change the priority to optional and re-upload the package, if that
> > > is the general consent.
> >
> > If the priority is changed, than it needs to be done by the ftp-masters
> > (an
Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:21:09AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > I just did another test installation on mips and noticed that DELO (a
> > > boot loader for some mipsel machines) got installed.
> >
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:21:09AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >
> >Quite the contrary. delo is intentionally Architecture: any, because
> >it can be used to make CD images bootable for DECstations. In fact,
> >a delo backport is used to create
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I just did another test installation on mips and noticed that DELO (a
> boot loader for some mipsel machines) got installed.
That's strange, as it should be optional, and nothing depends on it.
> I think that the mips binary should be removed from testing:
Quite the con
is at least the case for mozilla and (IIRC)
> >mozilla-firefox.
> >
> >
> AFAIK, 0.8-2 should be okay on mips/mipsel. I added the remove of -xgot
> patch provided by Thiemo Seufer. See:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272162.
They still don't work
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've built mozilla[1] and mozilla-thunderbird[2] on mipsel after the
> latest binutils update, and it finished quite nicely. It looks good, and
> I'd like someone to check the build loggs (especially Thieme Seufer) if
> the problems they saw previously are
Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> Thiemo Seufer writes:
> > tags 270620 +patch
> > thanks
> >
> > This patch adds xgot support to the CRTSTUFF files for Linux/MIPS.
> > Without it, programs using -mxgot tend to segfault in the constructor.
> > For other p
Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
> > > kernel-image-2.4.26-hppa_2.4.26-6
> > > kernel-patch-2.4.25-mips_2.4.25-0.040415.1
> > > kernel-patch-2.4.25-powerpc_2.4.25-8
>
> > 2.4.27 is available, removal?
>
> Not until it's definite that we'll be using 2.4.27 for sarge.
2.4.26-hppa and 2.4.25-powerpc ar
Robin Verduijn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 06:14:08AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Have you tried talking to the gcc maintainer team to find some mips
> > guys directly? Or to the linux-mips mailinglist? Maybe some non Debian
> > person can help.
>
> No, I haven't, but mayb
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The logs of the failed builds will be available after I got some sleep.
>
> http://bblank.thinkmo.de/debian/build-sarge/
kernel-patch-2.4.27-mips seems to be a false positive, caused by
a broken locale in th
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
[snip]
> > > I'm going to upload an updated kernel-image-2.4.26-alpha package next
> > > weekend, please make sure you're using this one, because it'll be
> > > build against kernel-source-2.4.26 2.4.26-6, which fixes some security
> > > issues.
> >
> > ... not kernel-ima
Clint Adams wrote:
> GNU sed upstream has requested that the attached patch from the
> OpenI18N people be applied to sarge. I told him that I would ask the
> release team.
The obvious question: What is this patch good for?
Thiemo
Yann Dirson wrote:
[snip]
> I have got no answer, and bigloo builds still seem to all fail on
> "reconfig", while they work on apparently all other attempted buildds
> (resume, casals, hawking, r5k) [2].
>
> Does that buildd have a specific problem which makes it unsuitable for
> this job ?
reconf
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-02 15:08]:
> > > > If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (>= 2.15) the dependencies need an update.
> > > you didn't give any reason. downgrading.
>
> According to this bug gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 uses the --as-needed option of
> ld which is new i
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2004, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>
> > Le dim, 23/05/2004 à 01:36 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit :
> > > Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered unstable, with rather unpleasant
> > > consequences
> >
> > rhythmbox is not related to gnome2.6 at all,
>
> That's
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:53:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Maybe we should use the "confirmed" tag on RC bugs as a cue that the
> > package definitely needs removing? (Or perhaps a "sarge-confirmed" tag
> > until version-tracking is finished)
[snip]
> Every pa
96 matches
Mail list logo
