Re: Bug#595728: git-core: permissions of templates too restrictive

2010-09-21 Thread The Anarcat
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:16:39AM +0300, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > (+cc: previous participants) > > The Anarcat wrote: > > > I understand that, but how does that keep us from issuing [an] > > update on security.debian.org? > [...] > > People running stable are

Re: please unblock drush 3.3

2010-08-28 Thread The Anarcat
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:12:26PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Are you aware that 3.1-2 hadn't enough time to reach Squeeze yet? Yes, I am aware of that. I did the upload of 3.1 before communicating with the rest of the Drush development team (at the drush BOF at Drupalcon Copenhagen), and I trie

please unblock drush 3.3

2010-08-27 Thread The Anarcat
Thanks for unblocking 3.1-2. That should go a long way towards providing users with a proper version in squeeze. (Short version: unblocking 3.3 will make following upstream much easier for security / stable upgrades) However, that version is not maintained for security upgrades upstream. I have t

Re: please update drush to 3.1-2 in squeeze

2010-08-23 Thread The Anarcat
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:46:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:32, The Anarcat wrote: > > I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable: > > > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html > >

Re: what to do about aegir-provision

2010-08-23 Thread The Anarcat
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:56:55PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:41, The Anarcat wrote: > > In fact, we are very close to getting 0.4 out the door. That release > > will be maintained for stability and security fixes, and would be a much

what to do about aegir-provision

2010-08-23 Thread The Anarcat
Hi, I am one of the upstream developers of the Aegir project and the maintainer of the Debian package. Some time ago, I have uploaded version 0.3-2.2, which bundles the upstream 0.3 version. That version is now very old. Nobody uses is in production, and even though the subsequent releases are al

please update drush to 3.1-2 in squeeze

2010-08-23 Thread The Anarcat
Hi, I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable: http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html This fixes a major usability issue due to a mis-packaging I originally did (forgot to include a file) described in #588639. The full diff from 3.1-1 is attached. It does

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-16 Thread The Anarcat
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:50:52AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > Are you using 7.3 kernel ? I confirm this problem with netstat has disappeared in the most recent squeeze. A. -- VBscript: la simplicité du C, la puissance du BASIC - Mathieu Petit-Clair signature.asc Des

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-16 Thread The Anarcat
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:50:52AM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > Are you using 7.3 kernel ? Yes, I think this was 7.3. (because of a few regressions in 8.1: mouse not working and red console, which I *think* are now fixed) A, which will go verifying all this now :) -- O gentilshommes, la vie es

Re: Releasability of the kFreeBSD ports

2010-08-15 Thread The Anarcat
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:11:26PM -0400, Tuco wrote: > I intend to deploy Debian GNU/kFreeBSD as a backup / NAS server. I > think as a desktop it's still inmature but as a server it's very > usable and has wonderful capabilities in storage > area thanks to ZFS (for example http://www.ypass.net/sol