-easily-use-the-input-module-name-for-C-FLAS.patch,
+ Updated-per-file-C-FLAGS-to-likely-final-delimiter.patch,
+ Fix build with C++11 and OpenEXR 2.5.x (Closes: #968829)
+
+ -- Sven Eckelmann Sun, 25 Apr 2021 07:57:10 +0200
+
exactimage (1.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New Upstre
On Saturday, 24 October 2020 20:37:36 CET Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded [1] with appended CVE in the changelog.
Kind regards,
Sven
[1]
https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/buster_diffs/fastd_18-3+deb10u1.debdiff
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
-1,3 +1,12 @@
+fastd (18-3+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches:
+- Add 0001-receive-fix-buffer-leak-when-receiving-invalid-packe.patch,
+ Fix DoS'able memory leak when receiving too many invalid packets
+ (Closes: #972521)
+
+ -- Sven Eckelmann Mon, 19 Oct 2020
-1,3 +1,12 @@
+fastd (18-2+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches:
+- Add 0001-receive-fix-buffer-leak-when-receiving-invalid-packe.patch,
+ Fix DoS'able memory leak when receiving too many invalid packets
+ (Closes: #972521)
+
+ -- Sven Eckelmann Mon, 19 Oct 2020
On Wednesday 23 March 2016 21:27:02 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 14:10 +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > I'd like to upload a new version of exactimage to stable/jessie.
> >
> > The exactimage package version in
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 07:42:44 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On 2015-05-26 20:05, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > I'd like to upload the attached patch to oldstable-proposed-updates to
> > fix
> > #786785 (C
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 07:44:03 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On 2015-05-26 20:05, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > I'd like to upload the attached patch to stable-proposed-updates to fix
> > #786785 (CVE-2015-3885). The
CVE-2015-3885: Integer overflow in the ljpeg_start function in dcraw
+ * debian/patches:
+- Add CVE-2015-3885.patch, Avoid overflow in ljpeg_start()
+ (Closes: #786785)
+- Add draw_jpeg_fix.patch, Fix execution order of ljpeg_start() and
+ result check
+
+ -- Sven Eckelmann Mon,
craw
+ * debian/patches:
+- Add CVE-2015-3885.patch, Avoid overflow in ljpeg_start()
+ (Closes: #786785)
+- Add draw_jpeg_fix.patch, Fix execution order of ljpeg_start() and
+ result check
+
+ -- Sven Eckelmann Mon, 25 May 2015 17:45:27 +0200
+
exactimage (0.8.9-7) unsta
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
The mupen64plus packages switched from SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 and now breaks older
versions of the core/plugins which were using SDL 1.2. This is necessary
because using two different versions of SDL in the same process doesn't work
(at least not as expe
On Monday 06 May 2013 23:07:31 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu batmand_0.3.2-13 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in a clean Debian sid
> environment."
>
> batmand/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: l
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
exactimage/0.8.5-5 was now sponsored. I would like to request an unblock with
an extended time in unstable as discussed in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00335.html
unb
feedback from the release team before I decide how to
continue with the upload.
exactimage (0.8.5-5) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
- Add Daniel Stender and Sven Eckelmann as new maintainer (Closes: #587062)
- Depend on libpng-dev instead of libpng12-dev (Closes: #662317)
- D
understand them.
Could you please unblock this package?
thanks,
Sven
Source: batman-adv-kernelland
Binary: batman-adv-source batman-adv-dkms
Architecture: source all
Version: 2010.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Wunderlich
Changed-By: Sven Eckelmann
D
discussed with Timo Schneider
* Only depend on libglib2.0-dev in -dev packages
-- Sven Eckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 09 Nov 2008 02:06:42 +0100
(only symbol file related stuff would be removed).
Regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
uggest?
It is not such a big hassle for me to remove that specific change. What
version number should I choose? 0.0.6-3lenny1?
What other changes should be removed?
Regards,
Sven Eckelmann
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 18 October 2008 18:25:11 Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:22:31AM +0000, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> > - Provide symbol file for libg3d0 and fail if it doesn't match with
> > libg3d0 symbols
>
> No
Ok
> I've not even read ot
ations for debian/* to debian/copyright
-- Sven Eckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:57:45 +0200
libg3d (0.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix lintian warnings
- Only call distclean when a makefile is present
- Add standard depends to fix missing depend on libc
- Pr
18 matches
Mail list logo