hi,
Release team,
In the later stage of freeze, are there any chance to upload newer
upstream version (into testing) to fix RC bugs?
If it can, I will finish staged git chages as soon as I can.
(This package is leaf plugin for request-tracker, so any other
r/depeds will not affect.)
regards,
O
hi,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> To be honest, the 4307ea34 commit smells more like a feature than a bug
> fix at first glance. Anyhow, please go ahead and let us know once it
> has been uploaded to unstable.
Excuse me, (a bit) incorrect expression. I had seen them as
hi,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 21.02.2013 14:31, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote:
> We can't unblock packages which aren't in the archive...
>
>> #698440
>> #700173
>> #700226
>
>
> ... and you don't need pre-approval to fix RC bugs.
OK, I will seek for spnsor to upload
hi,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> So, future version will have "unless(defined($msg))". I will prepare
>> 0.53-3 which apply this in advance.
> Okay, let me know when 0.53-3 is in unstable.
I've uploaded 0.53-3 into unstable. debdiff below:
diff -Nru mha4mysql-manag
hi,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Technically, this can map a "0" to a "" - not sure how likely that is in
> a "log_this" function, but you(r upstream) might have wanted
> "unless(defined($msg));" instead.
I've contacted upstream author about this. he thinks that:
It
hi,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> For this to work, you must (after the upload) file a bug against
> ftp.debian.org, requesting for the removal of the s390x binaries.
>
> The debdiff itself looks reasonable. That said, I am not sure we will
> re-allow the package in
hi,
At Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:31:18 +0900,
KURASHIKI Satoru wrote:
> Subject: Bug#692740: unblock: hyperestraier/1.4.13-8
I'm sorry forgetting to add the keyword, this bug is intended as
"pre approval" request (so package itself still don't be uploaded).
# I fixed BTS title.
regards,
--
KURASHIKI
hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
> So my question is: is there some upgrade path the users of
> request-tracker3.8 may follow to convert their current installs to the
> new package? I'm mostly concerned with the database, the settings and
> custom "scrips".
I've
hi,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 08:34 +0900, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote:
>> Please unblock package hyperestraier. 1.4.13-2 basically
>> fixes FTBFS bugs introduced in 1.4.13-1.
>
> That's a fairly broad definition of "basically", given this:
>
>> hy
9 matches
Mail list logo
