Re: Please give back vlc 0.8.6.h-4 on mips and mipsel

2008-09-04 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008, Luk Claes wrote: > Christophe Mutricy wrote: > > vlc failed to build on mips and mipsel for unstable. The very similar > > package in experimental built fine. So I believe it was bad luck. > > No, this looks more like you want to write something in the homedir > during build

Re: New ftgl-dev seems to cause breakage

2008-06-22 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > apparently a new API-changing version of ftgl-dev was recently > uploaded to unstable (which strikes me as a bad idea at this point!). > It has apparently caused breakage in a package I'm sponsoring, see > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg

Re: [Secure-testing-team] CVE-2007-1253: blender: eval injection vulnerability in kmz_ImportWithMesh.py

2007-04-04 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007, Luk Claes wrote: > Apparantly blender FTBFS on these archs, so finding out why it fails (and > maybe fixing it) might help. It fails because it incorrectly tries to link with libstdc++, which should never be done directly. Patch attached. -- Sam. diff -puriN blender-2.4

please unblock toilet/0.1-2 and libcaca/0.99.beta11.debian-3

2007-04-03 Thread Sam Hocevar
Following the discussion about FIGlet, I uploaded a new version of TOIlet, as well as a new version of libcaca (because it declared an incorrect old conflict with figlet, unnecessarily causing them to be uninstallable together). It might be too late for libcaca but well, I'm trying anyway. unbl

Re: Please unblock figlet 2.2.2-1

2007-03-27 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007, Carlos Laviola wrote: > I would be happy to make a new upload backporting these specific > changes only, provided they don't mind bending the rules a bit in this > case (which I believe would be harmless). Nice. Attached is a stripped-down diff to apply to 2.2.1-4. -- S

Re: Please unblock figlet 2.2.2-1

2007-03-26 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:18:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Sam Hocevar wrote: > > >Not having this version of figlet makes it impossible for free figlet > > > clones to use the figlet fonts. It has beenin unstable

[SECURITY] Please unblock ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-8

2007-03-26 Thread Sam Hocevar
ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-8 fixes numerous bugs with corrupted streams, exploitability was not confirmed but 11 potential crashes require some attention. Thanks, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please unblock figlet 2.2.2-1

2007-03-26 Thread Sam Hocevar
Not having this version of figlet makes it impossible for free figlet clones to use the figlet fonts. It has beenin unstable for 5 months and also fixes a potential security issue. Thanks, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Please unblock yasm 0.5.0-2

2007-03-25 Thread Sam Hocevar
yasm 0.5.0-2 fixes a crash with some specific files. -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SECURITY] please unblock beast 0.6.6-8

2007-03-21 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > Unblocked, then; Sam, I'd still appreciate seeing the error message fixed > since we're updating the package anyway. Okay, I'm building -9. -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

[SECURITY] please unblock beast 0.6.6-8

2007-03-20 Thread Sam Hocevar
This version of beast fixes a memory corruption issue and a bug in the suid wrapper that may give root control to an attacker. No advisory has been released AFAIK but it is similar to CVE-2006-2916. Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Please unblock colormake 0.2-4.3

2007-03-09 Thread Sam Hocevar
This version fixes two bugs: "clmake" was unusable (#412772) and quotes were interpreted twice. Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please unblock ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-7

2007-03-08 Thread Sam Hocevar
This version fixes a link issue on PowerPC making the postproc library unloadable. Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SECURITY: unblock ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-5

2007-01-29 Thread Sam Hocevar
Can you please unblock ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-5? It fixes two security issues, two build issues, a crash on non-AltiVec machines and a bug in the AVI parser. Regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Accepted vlc 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-3 (source i386 all)

2007-01-25 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > Anyway, I would still be a little more comfortable if the changes to > debian/rules weren't included in the diff, but it's not a big enough deal > that I would refuse to accept the package. So if you can make the three > other changes discussed above,

Re: Accepted vlc 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-3 (source i386 all)

2007-01-17 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > - 020_notify.diff includes a patch to prepend DATA_PATH to > "/usr/share/pixmaps/vlc.png". Why? This isn't documented in the > changelog, and doesn't make any sense to me anyway. Yes, I messed up that one. Will fix. > - patch-documentation-0

Re: Bug#396459: libsdl1.2-dev: Dropping *-dev dependencies breaks package builds too close to release

2006-11-01 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > > * [2] SDL_syswm.h needs the X headers. I'm not sure whether this should be > > fixed in libsdl1.2-dev or not; if it is, that could take care of about 1/3 > > to > > 1/2 of the failures. > > Seems like a clear case of a bug in libsdl1.2-dev to me

Re: lesstif1 -> lesstif2 migration

2006-06-13 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Is it neccessary to create a lesstiff2-dev? Did the API (not ABI) > change? Though programs are usually backwards-source-compatible, the API slightly changed, yes. A few new functions and structure member here and there. Regards, -- Sam.

Re: QA packages for release

2004-08-31 Thread Sam Hocevar
Likewise snacc has had recent attention, and if Sam Hocevar > tells me he's going to fix the latest problem, great--otherwise I'll > work on it tomorrow. Please do it if you can. I no longer have a computer and will only get the replacement on Thursday. -- Sam.