Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
Hi,
Could you please schedule a binNMU related to the libosmocore
transition (#911887)?
nmu gr-gsm_0.42.2-1 . ANY . unstable . -m ""
Thank you very much in advance!
Best regards
Ruben
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I would like to start a transition of libsmpp34. It has only one reverse
dependency - openbsc, which builds just fine.
This transition is closely related to libosmocore and should t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello!
I would like to start a transition of libosmocore with also a couple of
sub-transitions:
libosmogb5 -> libosmogb6(src:libosmocore)
libosmogsm8 -> libosmogsm10 (src:libosmoc
..aee9b20 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+openbsc (0.15.0-2+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/patches/dbi.patch:
+- Fix FTBFS with patch (from sid) (Closes: #880233)
+
+ -- Ruben Undheim Tue, 04 Sep 2018 20:25:16 +0200
+
openbsc (0.15.0-2) unstable
Hi,
I have retitled the unblock bug to match the new version.
The full diff is attached (generated with "git diff -M" to get clever
rename detection).
This now fixes 2 RC bugs:
#856705
#857088
Best regards
Ruben
updated.gitdiff
Description: Binary data
> I've sponsored the upload for you (I pushed the finalised changelog and
> signed tag to VCS). Finalised debdiff (and "gitdiff" since it's smart
> about moved files) attached.
Thank you VERY much, James!
This is highly appreciated.
I wish you all the best!
Best regards,
Ruben
libycadgraywolf1
+
+ -- Ruben Undheim Tue, 07 Mar 2017 09:13:26 +0100
+
+graywolf (0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream GIT HEAD with fixed license violation issue (Closes: #856705)
* debian/control:
@@ -6,7 +13,7 @@
* Updated debian/libycadgraywolf0.symbols
> It drops symbols so effectively this includes a transition.
I am aware of this. This reason I did not think an ABI bump would be
necessary in this case, is that these symbols anyway cannot be used
since the code behind violates the license.
> This upload will need an ABI bump - preferably the s
lf (0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream GIT HEAD with fixed license violation issue (Closes: #856705)
+ * debian/control:
+- New build-dependencies: libgsl-dev, pkg-config
+ * Updated debian/libycadgraywolf0.symbols - removed the symbols in license
+ violat
Hi Julien,
> > There are some memory issues when running the test suite for the package
> > openbsc. These disappears if libdbi-drivers is first rebuilt with GCC 5. It
> > is
> > hard to track down exactly what the problem is, but rebuilding it seems to
> > make
> > the test suite pass for openb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
There are some memory issues when running the test suite for the package
openbsc. These disappears if libdbi-drivers is first rebuilt with GCC 5. It is
hard to track down exactly wha
Hi,
> I've uploaded gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 now. Please finish things up
> with the release team to get it accepted. Some more details below.
Thanks for finding some time to upload so quickly!
Now it is ready for the point release!
> Fwiw, we tag every upload ... so if there's not already a jess
Hi Adam,
> I have to admit that (as a Jessie GNOME user) I don't recall ever being
> hit by any of those bugs.
I have been hit so many times by #787419 (on average every third day) and then
every time lost all my open gnome-terminal windows (of which I usually had
many - after three days of work.
> See:
> https://bugs.debian.org/773135
> https://bugs.debian.org/787419
Typo here.. Should be:
See:
https://bugs.debian.org/773135
https://bugs.debian.org/748469
(of course)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> It looks like #748469 was fixed in upstream 3.16.5:
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.16/gtk+-3.16.5.changes
> and #773135 was fixed in 3.15.4 :
> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.15/gtk+-3.15.4.changes
Thanks Mert,
The versions you mention were never uploaded to De
> The BTS metadata for #748469 and #773135 indicates that they are not yet
> fixed in unstable. If that's correct, then they need to be resolved
> there before we can look at fixing them in stable; if not, then the
> metadata needs to be updated to correctly reflect when (i.e. in which
> version(s)
package anyway will be updated. Please let us know if we should skip that and
only keep the first three. All the bugs have of course already been fixed
upstream and in sid.
Let us know if there is anything else we should do to help out.
Thanks for your attention.
Best regards,
Ruben Undheim
[1
Of course the version is:
berkeley-abc/1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg-1+deb8u1
and not:
berkeley-abc/1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg-1+debu8u1
Ruben
2015-05-26 21:31 GMT+02:00 Ruben Undheim :
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: jessie
> User: re
- (debian/patches/reproducibility.patch)
+
+ -- Ruben Undheim Tue, 26 May 2015 20:42:16 +0200
+
berkeley-abc (1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #761364)
diff -Nru
berkeley-abc-1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg/debian/patches/04_memory_alignment_fix.patch
19 matches
Mail list logo