Bug#913327: nmu: gr-gsm_0.42.2-1

2018-11-09 Thread Ruben Undheim
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hi, Could you please schedule a binNMU related to the libosmocore transition (#911887)? nmu gr-gsm_0.42.2-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "" Thank you very much in advance! Best regards Ruben

Bug#911889: transition: libsmpp34

2018-10-25 Thread Ruben Undheim
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I would like to start a transition of libsmpp34. It has only one reverse dependency - openbsc, which builds just fine. This transition is closely related to libosmocore and should t

Bug#911887: transition: libosmocore

2018-10-25 Thread Ruben Undheim
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello! I would like to start a transition of libosmocore with also a couple of sub-transitions: libosmogb5 -> libosmogb6(src:libosmocore) libosmogsm8 -> libosmogsm10 (src:libosmoc

Bug#907981: stretch-pu: package openbsc/0.15.0-2

2018-09-04 Thread Ruben Undheim
..aee9b20 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +openbsc (0.15.0-2+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/dbi.patch: +- Fix FTBFS with patch (from sid) (Closes: #880233) + + -- Ruben Undheim Tue, 04 Sep 2018 20:25:16 +0200 + openbsc (0.15.0-2) unstable

Bug#856986: unblock: graywolf/0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1

2017-03-11 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, I have retitled the unblock bug to match the new version. The full diff is attached (generated with "git diff -M" to get clever rename detection). This now fixes 2 RC bugs: #856705 #857088 Best regards Ruben updated.gitdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#856986: unblock: graywolf/0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1

2017-03-07 Thread Ruben Undheim
> I've sponsored the upload for you (I pushed the finalised changelog and > signed tag to VCS). Finalised debdiff (and "gitdiff" since it's smart > about moved files) attached. Thank you VERY much, James! This is highly appreciated. I wish you all the best! Best regards, Ruben

Bug#856986: unblock: graywolf/0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1

2017-03-07 Thread Ruben Undheim
libycadgraywolf1 + + -- Ruben Undheim Tue, 07 Mar 2017 09:13:26 +0100 + +graywolf (0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream GIT HEAD with fixed license violation issue (Closes: #856705) * debian/control: @@ -6,7 +13,7 @@ * Updated debian/libycadgraywolf0.symbols

Bug#856986: unblock: graywolf/0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1

2017-03-07 Thread Ruben Undheim
> It drops symbols so effectively this includes a transition. I am aware of this. This reason I did not think an ABI bump would be necessary in this case, is that these symbols anyway cannot be used since the code behind violates the license. > This upload will need an ABI bump - preferably the s

Bug#856986: unblock: graywolf/0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1

2017-03-06 Thread Ruben Undheim
lf (0.1.4+20170306gitecee764-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * New upstream GIT HEAD with fixed license violation issue (Closes: #856705) + * debian/control: +- New build-dependencies: libgsl-dev, pkg-config + * Updated debian/libycadgraywolf0.symbols - removed the symbols in license + violat

Bug#818837: nmu: libdbi-drivers_0.9.0-3

2016-05-11 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi Julien, > > There are some memory issues when running the test suite for the package > > openbsc. These disappears if libdbi-drivers is first rebuilt with GCC 5. It > > is > > hard to track down exactly what the problem is, but rebuilding it seems to > > make > > the test suite pass for openb

Bug#818837: nmu: libdbi-drivers_0.9.0-3

2016-03-20 Thread Ruben Undheim
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, There are some memory issues when running the test suite for the package openbsc. These disappears if libdbi-drivers is first rebuilt with GCC 5. It is hard to track down exactly wha

Bug#795911: Upload of gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 to Jessie will be accepted by the Stable Release Managers

2015-08-21 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi, > I've uploaded gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 now. Please finish things up > with the release team to get it accepted. Some more details below. Thanks for finding some time to upload so quickly! Now it is ready for the point release! > Fwiw, we tag every upload ... so if there's not already a jess

Bug#795911: jessie-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1

2015-08-18 Thread Ruben Undheim
Hi Adam, > I have to admit that (as a Jessie GNOME user) I don't recall ever being > hit by any of those bugs. I have been hit so many times by #787419 (on average every third day) and then every time lost all my open gnome-terminal windows (of which I usually had many - after three days of work.

Bug#795911: jessie-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1

2015-08-18 Thread Ruben Undheim
> See: > https://bugs.debian.org/773135 > https://bugs.debian.org/787419 Typo here.. Should be: See: https://bugs.debian.org/773135 https://bugs.debian.org/748469 (of course) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#795911: jessie-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1

2015-08-17 Thread Ruben Undheim
> It looks like #748469 was fixed in upstream 3.16.5: > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.16/gtk+-3.16.5.changes > and #773135 was fixed in 3.15.4 : > http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/gtk+/3.15/gtk+-3.15.4.changes Thanks Mert, The versions you mention were never uploaded to De

Bug#795911: jessie-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1

2015-08-17 Thread Ruben Undheim
> The BTS metadata for #748469 and #773135 indicates that they are not yet > fixed in unstable. If that's correct, then they need to be resolved > there before we can look at fixing them in stable; if not, then the > metadata needs to be updated to correctly reflect when (i.e. in which > version(s)

Bug#795911: jessie-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1

2015-08-17 Thread Ruben Undheim
package anyway will be updated. Please let us know if we should skip that and only keep the first three. All the bugs have of course already been fixed upstream and in sid. Let us know if there is anything else we should do to help out. Thanks for your attention. Best regards, Ruben Undheim [1

Bug#786922: jessie-pu: package berkeley-abc/1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg-1+debu8u1

2015-05-26 Thread Ruben Undheim
Of course the version is: berkeley-abc/1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg-1+deb8u1 and not: berkeley-abc/1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg-1+debu8u1 Ruben 2015-05-26 21:31 GMT+02:00 Ruben Undheim : > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: jessie > User: re

Bug#786922: jessie-pu: package berkeley-abc/1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg-1+debu8u1

2015-05-26 Thread Ruben Undheim
- (debian/patches/reproducibility.patch) + + -- Ruben Undheim Tue, 26 May 2015 20:42:16 +0200 + berkeley-abc (1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release (Closes: #761364) diff -Nru berkeley-abc-1.01+20140822hg4d547a5+dfsg/debian/patches/04_memory_alignment_fix.patch