> > Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis?
Correction:
mutt_1.0.0-3.2 for m68k is in proposed-updates, but we need
mutt_1.0.1.0-3.2 instead. Seems I couldn't distinguish those version
numbers :-)
The newer version is currently compiling.
Roman
> Just to be 100% sure: the m68k boot floppies are okay now?
Don't know, I don't do them.
Roman
> Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis?
Here the m68k answer:
The following packages (you marked as M68K missing) are already in
proposed-updates:
tetex-bin_0.9.981113-4
nethack_3.2.3-3
mutt_1.0.0-3.2
groff_1.15.1.11a.7.Y2K-1
mush_7.2.5unoff2-7.0.1
adjtimex_
> will have a look at it.
Just a mkdir -p debian/y2k is needed in debian/rules (before the dir
is used).
> the only m68k version of mutt I see is 1.0.0-1.100. It's severely
> buggy and 1.0.0-3.1 must be used.
Hmm... wasn't there a mail from the maintainer that -3.1 shouldn't be
used??
> huh? i
> which version of adjtimex are you talking about?
-2.1, same as you. debian/rules does the following:
debstd README debian/README.debian
mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/adjtimex/* debian/tmp/usr/doc/adjtimex/
rm -r debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/
mv debian/tmp/usr/share/ma
Update:
> adjtimex: will do today
This version of adjtimex has a bug, too. It was to do something with
docs in /usr/share/doc, but the slink debstd install them to /usr/doc.
The package needs to be fixed.
Roman
Hi Vincent!
Here's the status for m68k:
> In Incoming:
> slrn
slrn_0.9.5.7-16.0.9.5.3.6 recompiled today (will be uploaded soon).
> package : tetex-bin
> version : 0.9.981113-4
> architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC & M68K MISSING)
> issue: y2
7 matches
Mail list logo
