.
- 1033126 (odr-dabmux)
- 1033127 (odr-padenc)
Please, do not hesitate to revert to me, should you need more info or
if I need to perform other actions (keep in mind I am a complete
novice).
Thank you very much in advance.
Robin ALEXANDER
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
ommit/7f0b228f48ad29c13a84dc8c8bc050f34d3a855a
Regards,
Robin
https://bugs.debian.org/987831
Regards,
Robin
diff -Nru php-laravel-framework-6.20.14+dfsg/debian/changelog
php-laravel-framework-6.20.14+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- php-laravel-framework-6.20.14+dfsg/debian/changelog 2021-01-22
17:39:34.0 +
+++ php-laravel-fram
follows.
Thank you!
Robin
diff -Nru buildbot-2.0.1/debian/changelog buildbot-2.0.1/debian/changelog
--- buildbot-2.0.1/debian/changelog 2019-02-11 21:26:20.0 +0100
+++ buildbot-2.0.1/debian/changelog 2019-06-03 14:47:25.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+buildbot (2.0.1-2) unstable
Actualy the SS5 (at least the one I have got here) does have the problem
for libc6 version I need a kernel above 2.4.21, and for that kernel I
need that libc6 version.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Marc
I installed a minimal basic "stable" installation of Debian (no packages
selected with tasksel or dselect)
when doing the upgade as stated on
http://higgs.djpig.de/upgrade/upgrade-kernel/ via the dpkg method.
I first needed to install zlib1g, ash and stat.
maby it is better to mention that those
I installed a minimal basic "stable" installation of Debian (no packages
selected with tasksel or dselect)
when doing the upgade as stated on
http://higgs.djpig.de/upgrade/upgrade-kernel/ via the dpkg method.
I first needed to install zlib1g, ash and stat.
maby it is better to mention that those
it right afther I finished my test with the debian
installer and filled in a report
I hope I will be able to help :)
Greetings
Robin Harmsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rharmsen.nl
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; ;
Cc: <[EMAIL
Hi,
Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 08:54:57AM 10/11/04:
> Robin wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have a question about the t-p-u build queue; one of my packages (kvirc) is
> > trying to make it into testing by way of t-p-u and right now it's only
ove my
package along.
Thanks!
- Robin
there aren't
any Depends: clisp for any architectures. It's strictly a
Build-Dependency only.
> Since you have a problem with the language support for the specific
> arch it is very hard to find someone qualified to fix this.
:(
Thanks anyway!
- robin
but it did, and that's how things stand now.
- robin
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2004/05/msg00141.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2004/06/msg00035.html
to propagate to testing now is if its MIPS package is removed from the
testing archives. I filed a bug[2] for that almost 3 months ago. Should
I bump its severity up higher (it's now "serious") or will that make no
difference?
- robin
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
tion, but how do I upload a package
through t-p-u? Is there a howto somewhere for me to read up on or can someone
enlighten me? I assume that the package will have to be built against sarge
versions of its build dependencies and that it cannot go through the regular
buildds, right?
--
Robin
ge. The new upload also contains a fix for a segfault when kvirc
is compiled against Qt 3.3.
Please cc me on replies :)
Thanks,
Robin.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/08/msg00222.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> > I was a little surprised too. I don't think it's necessarily advance
> > warning that's necessary, but I do think that a release announcement
> > should go out at the time of the release, and that the web site should
> > be updated.
>
> Actually, this was something of a problem with potato's r
16 matches
Mail list logo
