grub-of (Re: Please fix your RC bugs)

2007-06-11 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:42:58PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > please note that even while we're not going to release Lenny next month, > RC bugs should be fixed in a very timly manner. Usually there is no > reason to let them open, and so we already started removing packages for > being

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-09 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:21:05AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > + uuid="$(PATH="/lib/udev:$PATH" vol_id -u $fs)" > + if [ "$uuid" ]; then > + printf "# %s\n" "$(mapdevfs $fs)" > + printf "%-15s %-15s %-7s %-15s %-7s %s\n" "UUID=$uuid" > "${mp

Re: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-08 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:28:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Is this theoretical with SATA, or have you reproduced it? I've only reproduced it for SCSI. > The usb sticks include sata-modules as well as usb-modules, so AFAICS, > hardware detection should happen in the same order when booting fr

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-08 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:09:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I don't believe this should be changed for etch at this point in the release > process, and that's speaking as someone who's run into this problem myself > with SCSI device renumbering -- it's awkward and annoying to have to > man

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > > With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install > > from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive. > > > > Of course, there are lots of hacks you can do to workaround that, but if > > we g

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > >> &

Re: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed. > The /dev/disk/by-*/ devices are well tested and I do not kno

Re: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:41:19PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:15:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I urge you to reconsider severity of th

Re: Bug#389881: RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-07 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > > > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There&#

RC-ness of this bug

2007-03-06 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
Hi, I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another situation that makes it much worse: - User boots off USB stick - sda is USB, sdb is SCSI or SATA - GRUB install on (hd0) (i.e. sda) fails. - Manual repairing is not possible, because if you boot a rescue system o

Re: Bug#409882: changes in upstream

2007-02-06 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:43:15AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > > Given all this, would still be possible to consider this for etch ? > > ...which would require another round of main and non-free conglomeration > packages in NEW, togethe

changes in upstream

2007-02-06 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
It seems that the changes between pre9 and pre10 for code we already had are purely non-technical (license change, etc). See attached diff. Other than this, we just have changes in documentation/makefiles and replacement of object code with a newer version of its corresponding source. I think w

udev and I2O support

2006-08-25 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
Hi! udev 0.097-1 contains fixes necessary support of I2O drives (see #373921). I understand that the version of udev currently in sid (or later) will forcibly get into etch because of #369479, but I'm not sure if this will affect d-i image generation. Is d-i etch RC1 expected to include udev >=