On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:42:58PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please note that even while we're not going to release Lenny next month,
> RC bugs should be fixed in a very timly manner. Usually there is no
> reason to let them open, and so we already started removing packages for
> being
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:21:05AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> + uuid="$(PATH="/lib/udev:$PATH" vol_id -u $fs)"
> + if [ "$uuid" ]; then
> + printf "# %s\n" "$(mapdevfs $fs)"
> + printf "%-15s %-15s %-7s %-15s %-7s %s\n" "UUID=$uuid"
> "${mp
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:28:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Is this theoretical with SATA, or have you reproduced it?
I've only reproduced it for SCSI.
> The usb sticks include sata-modules as well as usb-modules, so AFAICS,
> hardware detection should happen in the same order when booting fr
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:09:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> I don't believe this should be changed for etch at this point in the release
> process, and that's speaking as someone who's run into this problem myself
> with SCSI device renumbering -- it's awkward and annoying to have to
> man
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:55:45AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> > With USB, you can't just boot a rescue system and repair a broken install
> > from there, because /dev/sda will still be your USB drive.
> >
> > Of course, there are lots of hacks you can do to workaround that, but if
> > we g
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:33:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> >>
&
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 07, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Labels are not well tested and a source of problems indeed.
> The /dev/disk/by-*/ devices are well tested and I do not kno
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:41:19PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:15:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I urge you to reconsider severity of th
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:44:31AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>
> > On Mar 06, "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There
Hi,
I urge you to reconsider severity of this problem. There's another situation
that makes it much worse:
- User boots off USB stick
- sda is USB, sdb is SCSI or SATA
- GRUB install on (hd0) (i.e. sda) fails.
- Manual repairing is not possible, because if you boot a rescue system
o
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:43:15AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
> > Given all this, would still be possible to consider this for etch ?
>
> ...which would require another round of main and non-free conglomeration
> packages in NEW, togethe
It seems that the changes between pre9 and pre10 for code we already had
are purely non-technical (license change, etc). See attached diff.
Other than this, we just have changes in documentation/makefiles and
replacement of object code with a newer version of its corresponding
source. I think w
Hi!
udev 0.097-1 contains fixes necessary support of I2O drives (see #373921). I
understand that the version of udev currently in sid (or later) will forcibly
get into etch because of #369479, but I'm not sure if this will affect d-i
image generation.
Is d-i etch RC1 expected to include udev >=
13 matches
Mail list logo