Bug#989939: unblock: vala/0.48.18-1

2021-06-16 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: ric...@ubuntu.com Please unblock package vala Vala 0.48.18 * Various improvements and bug fixes: - codegen: + GArray, GByteArray and GPtrArray are referenc

Bug#986869: unblock: vala/0.48.17-1

2021-04-26 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
ld with vala 0.48.17 + + -- Rico Tzschichholz Mon, 26 Apr 2021 21:47:05 +0200 + deepin-terminal (5.0.0+ds1-2) unstable; urgency=high * debian/patches: Add upstream PR to fix FTBFS with new libvte diff -Nru deepin-terminal-5.0.0+ds1/debian/patches/0004-vala-x11.patch deepin-terminal-5.0.0+ds1/debi

Bug#986646: (no subject)

2021-04-13 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Superseded by https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986869

Bug#986869: unblock: vala/0.48.17-1

2021-04-12 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: ric...@ubuntu.com Please unblock package vala Vala 0.48.17 * Regression and bug fixes: - codegen: + Don't free temp-var for element-access to array with bo

Bug#986646: unblock: vala/0.48.16-1

2021-04-08 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: ric...@ubuntu.com Please unblock package vala [ Reason ] Vala 0.48.x series is a Long-Term support version and receives important bug fixes and binding fixes. It is part of G

Bug#985538: unblock: vala/0.48.15-1

2021-03-23 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
Thanks for your review! I have built libisocodes with olders valac versions which resulted in the same failure. libisocodes built fine with vala 0.48.13-1 and is failing with the same now. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libisocodes&arch=amd64&ver=1.2.3-1&stamp=1611708223&raw=0

Re: [SRU] Proposal of docky 2.0.12-1 for squeeze 6.0.1

2011-03-11 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
>> >> I understand your concerns, but I as docky developer strongly recommend >> this update. >> >> docky 2.0.12-1 will be uploaded to unstable later this week. > > Even after that's occurred, your proposal still appears to be a direct > backport to stable of the package that would be uploaded to

Re: [SRU] Proposal of docky 2.0.12-1 for squeeze 6.0.1

2011-03-10 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
> For a stable update, it's a little more than a "quite large" diff. Neverthelesse it is a stable update which includes fixes of half a year. There were 92 commits since 2.0.6 which are solving several problems. http://wiki.go-docky.com/index.php?title=Changelog includes links to the specific bug

[SRU] Proposal of docky 2.0.12-1 for squeeze 6.0.1

2011-03-10 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
;h=refs/heads/master-squeeze Here is a not proper versioned package for testing purposes. http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/docky/docky_2.0.12-1.dsc If this doesnt meet the formal requirements please say so, thank you. Best regards, Rico Tzschichholz Docky Changelog since 2.0.6 2.0.12 "S

Request upload of Docky 2.0.10 to Squeeze

2011-01-09 Thread Rico Tzschichholz
-1_trimmed.debdiff (debdiff docky_2.0.6-2.dsc docky_2.0.10-1.dsc | filterdiff -x "*.po*" -x "*/data/icons/*" > docky_2.0.6-2_2.0.10-1.debdiff) Source repository: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-cli-apps/packages/docky.git Best regards, Rico Tzschichholz Changes since 2.0.6: