ebian is superb. However, it would be good if
Debian could also be more aware of J.Average User.
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
+64 3 488 2818Fax +64 3 488 2875Mobile 025 267 9420
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred. [E
built massive images with debian-cd, but not quite as large as a
DVD. cat'ing the CD images and then running rsync would work. The pseudo
image kit should work as is. I am not certain about jigdo, I have not
used it.
Phil.
__
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedi
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Philip Charles wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > IIRC, the second release of 2.1 was called 2.1r2 to avoid the confusion
> > > > I
> > > > am in
ease" and so would see 2.2 as
> > being identical with 2.2r1.
> >
>
> But still, if we are going to make that assumption, then we should call
> this one 2.2r1, and not skip the nomenclature. It's confusing.
Agree about it being confusing. If we want to keep "r&
initely happening in a couple of weeks ;-)
> >
> >2.2r1 The first revision, after the initial release
> >
> >2.2r2 etc.
> >
> > Right?
IIRC, the second release of 2.1 was called 2.1r2 to avoid the confusion I
am in the process of creating. We may m
t advantages. Debian has a reputation of being difficult
to install so we need to ensure that the CDs are problem free and user
friendly.
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Abbotsford, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell GNU/Linux CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
; potato, because I can already tell you that potato will not have
> all of its dependency issues ironed out before the release.
>
CDs can be produced with force_deps, however, the conflict is unneccessary
given that the right version of we-el is available.
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Pate
> (Critical bug:#62169: ftp.debian.org 2.1r5/6 issues: w3-el,
> security and ChangeLog; 9 days old ) I also reported the
> problem in a private email on 3-13 .
>
If w3-el is fixed, at least 2.1r5 will work. Please!!
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Abbotsford, New Ze
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Philip Charles wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 25 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 23-Mar-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
&
ists on my product for those who
> choose to install that package. If that is the case installing from the
> stable ftp archive would also be a problem until it is updated.
>
Anyone who tries to use any of the preselected systems will run into
problems with their installation with 2.1r5(6,7,8)
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Abbotsford, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell GNU/Linux CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Philip Charles wrote:
>
> > Still broken!!!
>
> What exactly is broken?
The w3-el and emacs20 dependency problem. I was under the impression that
a compatable version of w3-el had been uploaded. I had up
11 matches
Mail list logo
