[Neil Roeth]
> diff -u aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
> --- aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
> +++ aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> # 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010,
> # 2011, 2012 Free Software
[Nicholas Breen]
> That bug is waiting on a new cmake upload -- would it be acceptable
> to the RT to remove gromacs from testing, allowing lesstif2 to
> migrate, and then re-admitting a binNMU'ed gromacs after cmake is
> updated? Assuming the lesstif and (as-yet-unavailable) cmake
> migrations t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mtink
Two FTBFS issues fixed: one for new lesstif2 (which is not in wheezy
yet), the other for dpkg-dev 'binary' vs 'binary-arch'.
Unfortunately I wasn't thinking of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
subversion 1.6.12dfsg-4:
- Relax the runtime version check of SQLite. (As has been noted on
IRC, a BinNMU on squeeze would be an acceptable workaround.)
- CVE-2010-4539 - ability to crash Apache server child processes.
I'm not sure if the impact
s reasons - but probably nothing
to do with this upload, it's in the ruby testsuite which has failed
mysteriously on kfreebsd before. The testsuite starts a TCP server on
localhost and connects to it (and kills it when done); perhaps there's
a buildd restriction against doing things li
o
block on the shlibs bump in sqlite3. I see you, Julien and GCS are
already talking about that one too, so I'll wait.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
[Adam D. Barratt]
> Thanks for that, and your notes on them. Based on these and looking
> at the patches, I agree with your assessment. Please upload to
> unstable with the first and last patches
Thanks for the review!
Looks like if I build for unstable, I'll pick up a Depends on
libneon27-gnu
And here, attached, are the patch files.
> 1. 'server-memleaks': Fix a handful of server-side memory leaks, in
>which untrusted remote clients can DoS a server by making it use way
>too much memory. There's a patch to shuffle around some memory pool
>usage - create, use, destroy. An
I'm very sorry for the late late notice, I should have gotten on this a
week or two ago. There are quite a lot of upstream Subversion 1.6.x
fixes that are not in squeeze, but most of them are probably not
appropriate for squeeze at this point.
Could someone give feedback on which (if any) of the
apache.org/security/CVE-2010-3315-advisory.txt
The second change is trivial and was already pending. Functionally, it
adds a Python-Version header to one package, as documented in the
Python policy. I think this falls under 'documentation'.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http:
iles in /usr/lib/pkgconfig) offers the
same functionality, and more, with considerably less brokenness. We'd
like to encourage upstreams to ship .pc files and use pkg-config in
their configure.ac scripts as the primary means of detecting the
presence of other libraries and how to use them.
--
($stdout)
> >{
> > $formatted_date = strftime('%a %b %e %X %Y', localtime());
> > push(@head, "From $mail_from $formatted_date\n");
> >
[Luk Claes]
> Please upload.
Uploaded subversion_1.5.1dfsg1-3 to p-u.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
efault. I don't know if those cases are
terribly important for the release notes. Do the release notes say
which inetd we favor? Well, I see they do, but should they?
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
ight not even notice the fact that DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
is ignored in their package - I mean, who tests that? So that's kind
of bad too.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
o-java list. I
understand that's less important than the python2.5 transition.
For these reasons I recommend forcing 1.4.6dfsg1-3 into testing.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nd test) it
soon.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yet another l10n-only gpm upload, 1.19.6-25. Please unblock.
Thanks,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please unblock gpm 1.19.6-24, which comprises only debconf po updates.
Thanks,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Joe Orton]
> `neon-config --la-file` is part of the defined and documented neon
> interface: removing the .la file breaks that interface, and hence
> will break applications designed to build against neon.
So, I was the one who requested that the neon26 maintainer remove the
.la file. I'll inco
[Manoj Srivastava]
> Given this official statement, I also suggest that the GR
> proposal is moot, since the proposer himself believes that the kernel
> modules in question can not be distributed by Debian legally.
There are a few firmware files which are sourceless but explicitly
_not_
subversion in sid needs a recompile now that python 2.4 is here. Can
someone trigger a binNMU on all architectures? It doesn't seem worth
the trouble to source-upload, and a binNMU for new python _should_ be
safe.
BTW, Andi - thanks for pushing the neon transition through the other
day.
Peter
[Peter Samuelson]
> Could somebody kick a buildd to binNMU subversion 1.3.0-4 on i386 only?
Cancel that, fixed in 1.3.0-5, kindly sponsored by Martin Pitt.
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Could somebody kick a buildd to binNMU subversion 1.3.0-4 on i386 only?
A well-known bug where we don't cleanse quite all the rpaths suddenly
became a security issue because the last version uploaded on i386 was
built in /tmp, so the two apache modules have built-in rpaths that
would let an attack
|4
9 files changed, 1070 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
gpm (1.19.6-19sarge1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
[ Peter Samuelson ]
* Added German debconf translation. (Closes: #278989)
Thanks to Jens Nachtigall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
* Write a gpm.conf(5) manpage. (Closes: #
[bill smith]
> I have just loaded Mandrake 9.2 on this system. I
> have heard wonderful things regarding Debian as well.
> However after browing the debian site no where is it
> found for certain which kernal release Debian is
> supporting.
"Supporting" - 2.4.18 at this time, possibly 2.4.20.
25 matches
Mail list logo
