On May 27, 2019 8:55:53 PM GMT+01:00, Paul Gevers wrote:
>Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
>Hi David,
>
>On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:52:56 -0400 David Gilman
>wrote:
>> Users who want to use s3ql with Google's cloud storage API need to
>> obtain an OAuth credential with the appropriate permissions. s3ql
On Feb 20 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 13:46:54 -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On Aug 29 2015, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 19:29 -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> >> Would it be acceptible to upload a fix for
On Jan 06 2016, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> 5. Cython3 not currently working [3]. This appears to be due to a change in
> python3.5. It affects borgbackup and s3ql only. As these are rather late in
> the transition, we could probably go ahead while this is getting sorted.
> These
> are both lea
Hi Jonathan,
On Sep 10 2015, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:00:27PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> The s3ql package is not migrating to testing. As far as I understand,
>> this is because it's not building on armhf.
>
> Your analysis is correct
Hi,
Please note that the majority of the patch affects only the "s3qladm
upgrade" command which jessie users will either use once (and then it
will have failed for them and they need this patch), or never (because
they don't need it). So I think these changes have extremely little
change of introd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
The s3ql package is not migrating to testing. As far as I understand,
this is because it's not building on armhf.
However, I think it would be a lot better to have s3ql in testing for
the other archituctures than not to have it in testing at al
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Aug 29 2015, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 19:29 -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Would it be acceptible to upload a fix for #792685 to jessie?
>>
>> In short, the S3QL version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release managers,
Would it be acceptible to upload a fix for #792685 to jessie?
In short, the S3QL version currently in jessie is unable to read file
system created with the S
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
The package is now in unstable.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
` function now knows about more kinds of
temporary errors, in particular also about those that do not have a
corresponding Python exception (e.g. "no route to host").
Closes: #771756.
-- Nikolaus Rath Wed, 03 Dec 2014 09:11:52 -0800
Debdiff against testing is attached.
The pack
apsw.ConstraintError" or incorrectly considering storage
objects as missing when the connection to remote server is
interrupted. Closes: #771452.
-- Nikolaus Rath Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:44:27 -0800
Debdiff is attached.
unblock s3ql/2.11.1+dfsg-2
diff -Nru s3ql-2.11.1+dfsg/debian/c
On 04/18/2014 01:35 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Could you please remove the s3ql package from testing? It's already
>> scheduled for autoremoval, but it'd be nice if we don't have to wait for
>> the deadline to pass.
>>
>> There is a new s3ql release in unstable that fixes the RC bug of
>> the vers
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
Could you please remove the s3ql package from testing? It's already
scheduled for autoremoval, but it'd be nice if we don't have to wait for
the deadline to pass.
There is a new s3ql rel
2013-02-24 18:52:36.0 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+s3ql (1.11.1-3) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Call fflush() on FILE stream before repositioning underlying
+file descriptor. Closes: 701350.
+
+ -- Nikolaus Rath Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:51:42 -0800
+
s3ql (1.11.1-2) un
On 03/03/2013 10:31 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 17:49 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Ok, I updated severity and tags of the bug and uploaded a new version
>> to unstable that fixes the issue there.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> I have put the
On 02/27/2013 11:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 10:18 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On 02/27/2013 05:25 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On 25.02.2013 02:41, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>>> I'd like to upload a new version of S3QL to
testing-propo
Hi Adam,
On 02/27/2013 05:25 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 25.02.2013 02:41, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> I'd like to upload a new version of S3QL to testing-proposed-updates to
>> fix bug #701350. Unstable already contains a newer upstream release
>> (1.12), so I cannot
On 02/24/2013 06:41 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to upload a new version of S3QL to testing-proposed-updates to
> fix bug #701350. Unstable already contains a newer upstream release
> (1.12), so I cannot upload there.
>
> Essentially, a missing fflush()
Hi,
I'd like to upload a new version of S3QL to testing-proposed-updates to
fix bug #701350. Unstable already contains a newer upstream release
(1.12), so I cannot upload there.
Essentially, a missing fflush() call when accessing a file using both a
FILE* stream and a file descriptor causes data
19 matches
Mail list logo
