@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+imposm-parser (1.0.6-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * New upstream release:
+- Fix segmentation fault in OSMPBF.so (Closes: #766770)
+
+ -- Nelson A. de Oliveira Sat, 08 Nov 2014 21:50:07 -0200
+
imposm-parser (1.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
At http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=mdbtools it's
possible to see this:
"mdbtools depends on automake >= 1:1.10 but testing has 1:1.4-p6-13.1
(unstable has 1:1.11.1-1)"
But actually we have an automake source package version
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
>> Can I upload it to stable, so it can be included on the next point release,
>> please?
>
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded, thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
Like #603704, I was instructed to upload a fix of #601824 for the stable
distribution via a "stable" upload.
All the files are available at
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/imagemagick
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
I have uploaded a new revision of imagemagick (8:6.6.0.4-3) fixing only a
security issue (#601824).
The security team asked to upload it to unstable with urgency medium, and ask
for the
Hi Adam!
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> A couple of packages which weren't ready got removed from testing in the
> process, but they should be able to go back in once they're ready.
Perfect.
Thank you a lot for helping in such smooth (if we don't count that
little mes
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable; we'll then schedule the
> binNMUs.
Uploaded to unstable.
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi!
On #564123 we saw that imagemagick upstream did some incompatible ABI changes,
without updating the SONAME version.
They did change it later and we have an updated package available
Hi!
In January I have asked about a possible ImageMagick transition [1].
Didn't get any answer until now, so I am re-asking if it's possible to
schedule this transition, please.
Upstream has updated the SONAME version (see #564123). The updated
package is available on experimental.
[1] http://li
Hi!
We have a new imagemagick package prepared, where upstream has changed its
SONAME version (and now we will have libmagickcore2 -> libmagickcore3,
libmagickcore2-extra -> libmagickcore3-extra, libmagickwand2 -> libmagickwand3,
libmagick++2 -> libmagick++3).
A simple binNMU of the packages depen
Hi!
samba is uninstallable in unstable, as it depends on libtalloc1:
samba: Depends: libtalloc1 (>= 1.3.0) which is a virtual package.
libwbclient0: Depends: libtalloc1 (>= 1.0.1) which is a virtual package.
A binNMU should fix this.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi!
mysql-admin (from source package mysql-gui-tools) is uninstallable in unstable
right now:
mysql-admin: Depends: libmysqlclient15off (>= 5.0.27-1) which is a virtual
package.
A binNMU should fix this.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ.
Hi!
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:52:01AM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Should imagemagick be unblocked? It has been waiting 50 days due to
>> being held back by dato:
>
> We'll look at it soon. Last time we tried britney coredumped because of
> EN
Hi!
Just reporting that ImageMagick has been uploaded to unstable.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Adeodato!
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:36 +0200
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Can I ping you back when it hits experimental, please? (and then
> > find a good moment for all of us to upload it to unstable)
>
> Hm, I’m sorry if this needed a reply. I see it now an experimental,
> and didn’t think per
Hi!
ImageMagick in Lenny has non-free fonts with it (see bug #510751).
The proposed update is to upload the current version in testing
6.3.7.9.dfsg2-1 as 6.3.7.9.dfsg2-1~lenny1 (this version in testing is
exactly the same that is also in Lenny, with the only difference that
the fonts were replaced
Hi Adeodato!
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:37:24 +0100
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Nelson A. de Oliveira [Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:20:22 -0300]:
> Regarding the transition itself, I’ll try to get back to you as soon
> as possible, we’re a bit too backlogged at the moment! It’s quite
> possible,
Hi!
We would like to schedule a transition slot for ImageMagick, please.
We are preparing a new release on our SVN repository, with a soname bump.
A simple binNMU for the packages that depends on libmagick* will be sufficient
(while there are new -dev packages, the new ones provide the old ones;
s
Dear stable release managers,
OptiPNG in etch and lenny has an array overflow vulnerability (CVE-2009-0749).
After talking with our security team, we have decided that it's better to
have a fix via a stable update (and not a DSA, as the impact seems to be
limited).
The patch for stable is availab
Hi Adeodato!
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:02:32 +0100
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, please upload to unstable, and then to t-p-u with a version that
> is greater than testing but lower than unstable.
7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-3 uploaded to unstable and 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-3~lenny1 to
testing-propose
Hi!
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:04:55 +0100
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, please tell us when it's uploaded.
pngtools 0.3-2 uploaded.
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Nelson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
03477).
+
+ -- Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:04:42 -0200
+
imagemagick (7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2.1+lenny1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=high
* Reupload to tpu
diff -u imagemagick-6.3.7.9.dfsg1/debian/rules
imagemagick-6.3.7.9.dfsg1/debian/rules
--- imagemagick-6.
Hi!
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:54:03 +0100
Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several
> >> occurrences). Is that intentional?
> >
>
Hi Julien!
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:39:00 +0100
Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +-unsigned int i;
> > ++int32_t i;
>
> You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several
+1,9 @@
+pngtools (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix pngchunks on 64 bits platforms (Closes: #503820).
+
+ -- Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 04 Dec 2008
11:21:09 -0200 +
pngtools (0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #405139).
diff -u pngtools-0.3/d
Hi!
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:13:35 +0100
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this sound doable from your side? In particular, using Provides
> is much easier than using transitional packages, so it should be less
> effort for you. (Unless somebody has spotted that it won't work, in
> tha
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently uploaded, so unblocked.
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:26:36 +0100
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > So do I have a pre-approval to upload it to unstable, including
> > only a patch to fix SA32651, please?
>
> Yes.
OK.
debdiff:
dif
Hi!
A security vulnerability has been found in optipng (Debian bug #505399,
SA (Secunia Advisory) http://secunia.com/Advisories/32651/). It has
been fixed in version 0.6.2 (that is already at experimental).
Code change from 0.6.1 to 0.6.2 is a little big:
lib/pngxtern/pngx.h | 22
lib/png
Hi!
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:16:23 +0100
Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea how many packages this will affect, and how many of these
> will now FTBFS?
> ImageMagick isn't famed for it's stable ABIs... :)
That is why I have asked (2+ weeks ago) the maintainers to test the
building
Hi!
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:37:53 +0200
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Something says to me that the answer will be "Sorry, too late", but
> > is it a p
Hi!
Something says to me that the answer will be "Sorry, too late", but is
it a possibility (time is short, I know) to have an ImageMagick
transition (with soname and package names changes)?
It won't be simple as a binNMU, unfortunately :-/
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
signature.asc
Descrip
Dear release-team,
We have a new version of ImageMagick settled on experimental and we are
wanting to upload it to unstable.
Lucas Nussbaum kindly did a rebuild of the packages depending on
imagemagick (total of 28 [1]), with 3 of them failing to build (seems
that one of these has a new version t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
It seems that a binNMU of libsdl1.2 will fix #455490
If yes, is it possible to you schedule a binNMU of it, please?
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Nelson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHX999AQwuptkwlk
Hi Cosmin, hi release managers!
I am forwarding an email that Cosmin Truta, upstream author of OptiPNG
sent to me and Luk.
OptiPNG is already one month on unstable, without any problems.
The diff between the testing version and the unstable version is
available here: http://people.debian.org/~nao
Hi Luk!
On 2/12/07, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The other one is optipng 0.5.5-1
> It's a bug fix release too (fixing some bugs on the colors of the
> optimized PNGs).
24 files changed, 578 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
Not unblocked as too much to review for little gain and more
Hi release managers!
I have uploaded unrar-nonfree 3.7.3 to unstable, fixing CVE-2007-0855.
Testing version is 3.5.4 and it's also vulnerable. Changes from 3.5.4 to
3.7.3 are big: 71 files changed, 1307 insertions and 476 deletions (so
probably you won't allow version 3.7.3 to propagate to testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi release managers!
Could you unblock two packages for me, please?
One is qsf 1.2.6-1, fixing a problem that could cause undelivered mail on
systems with a lot of users and emails.
The other one is optipng 0.5.5-1
It's a bug fix release too (fixing
Hi!
Could you unblock qsf 1.2.5-2, please?
Version 1.2.5-1 is a new upstream version, bugfix only release (no new code).
1.2.5-2 revision just adds a build-depends on bsdmainutils and man-db to
get a text file (a quickref guide) generated from the manpage.
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Nels
built properly.
+Now, dependencies are correctly declared on generated packages.
+(Closes: #405268)
+
+ -- Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:58:20 -0200
+
tcptrace (6.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -u tcptrace-6.6.1/debian/c
Hi!
On 12/18/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have a better idea than statically linking against libpng?
Add png_get_uint_32 and png_save_uint_32 to optipng and link against
libpng 1.2.8 ?
Actually they are present on libpng 1.2.8 (but they are exported only
if PNG_INTERNAL
Hi!
It looks like that we will get libpng 1.2.8 back to Etch, right?
But one of my packages (optipng) needs at least libpng 1.2.9 (it needs
png_get_uint_32 and png_save_uint_32).
When version 1.2.8 gets uploaded, probably optipng will FTBFS and I will
upload a new version statically linked agains
Hi
First, sorry if this message is not to be discussed on debian-release.
I have a package (gff2aplot), with version 2.0-1 on Testing and 2.0-2 on
Unstable. Changes between both revisions are minimal (just corrected
Suggests field and description).
The problem is that there is no ARM version on T
43 matches
Mail list logo
