sha256.o on PPC to fix
+performance regression (Closes: #854053)
+
+ -- Michael Stone Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:23:45 -0500
+
coreutils (8.26-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix regression in which specifying a TZ in date -d causes the
diff -Nru coreutils-8.26/debian/control coreutils-8.26/debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: norma
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package coreutils to address #765514. Upstream made a change to
chroot(8) in the coreutils currently in testing which skipped calling chroot(2)
if chrooting to the current root
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:29:58PM -0600, Jason Kolpin wrote:
seem to simply refuse to work with. I fail to understand this, and I'm
no genius but there must be a way for the entire Debian team to figure
some sort of elegant, permanent, and secure solution to this whole thing
instead of patc
Please see 573940. I'm open to suggestions on how to deal with this. If
I understand correctly, kfreebsd has been declared a release arch for
squeeze, but its libc (0.1?) doesn't handle compatibility between kernel
versions, its old kernel lacks features that are standard in other
debian archs,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:58:08PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Michael Stone wrote:
Please unblock coreutils.
unblocked
Thanks.
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.) (Closes: #459615)
-- Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:02:18 -0400
coreutils (6.10-5) unstable; urgency=low
* [75] Fix that last patch so that it doesn't display error messages
on non-selinux systems (closes: 473739)
-- Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 07:14:14PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I see there is a fix in the bug report now. Do you want to
create a -6 package, or do you want me to try -5.3 NMU?
Right now, I don't care. I personally feel that the manual build should
have been sufficient to get -5.2
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 07:18:20PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
[2] Newsflash: sudo and spamassassin stable arm packages have appeared!
I missed them because they had the wrong date--apparantly the arm buildd
completed them on 25 Jun, several days before I uploaded anything to
klecker. I wait
Ok, let's say wanna-build is ok. Let's say everything is ok (I don't
know enough about the buildd structure to claim otherwise). WTF is up
then?[1] I've already released two DSA's without arm, and have 3 more
pending. (I won't get into the missing oldstable ia64 sudo or the
missing hppa stable spa
.. Original Message ...
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:11:33 -0700 "Matt Zimmerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 07:58:48AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
>> Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > pavuk 0.9pl28-3 includes the fix for DSA-527, but there is another
>> > security bug affe
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:21:05PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Perhaps you could write down some of the more frequent problems that
users with UTF-8 might expect to see
No. I have no interest in this problem and don't care to work with you.
I've reassigned the coreutils bug to libc6 and
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:36:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I agree that an apology isn't necessary, but *some* kind of advice,
given that sarge will be *removing* support for a large class of users,
That's not true. Something is changing, arguably for the worse. Nobody
is being unsupp
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:29:21PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
But the problem here is that you seem totally unable to seek
compromise. I'll try again.
Good grief, this isn't personal. Maybe you should just relax and come
back tomorrow.
Mike Stone
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:14:48PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Actually that's not a "real technical reason". If you could point to
a package with a bug that would be a serious problem if people used
UTF-8, then that would be a real technical reason. But saying "it
isn't required for sarg
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:09:36PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Are you willing to compromise?
What is there for me to compromise about? I pointed out a potential
*technical* problem with your proposal and you jumped all over me and
suggested that my phone number be put in the release note
ks about it).
I've had my own problems in that area, but *I didn't demand a damned
apology in the release notes*.
I hesitate to tell people to use UTF-8 because full multibyte compliance
isn't guaranteed in sarge.
How about we publish your home phone number so that they c
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 12:35:58PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
No apology is necessary, because of (1).
No apology is necessary because it's a ridiculous concept.
I hesitate to tell people to use UTF-8 because full multibyte compliance
isn't guaranteed in sarge.
Mike Stone
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:28:14PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
It feels to me as if you are intentionally failing to get my point.
Likewise. :)
I have no problems reading ``this'' as double quotes, but ,,this" is just
a double comma.
Well, `` isn't a double quote any more than ,, is--it's a p
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:05PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Once again, the english quotes are also stupid:
mv -iv foo bar
`foo' -> `bar'
It is not clear why german users are the only ones who need an "apology"
because t
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 12:26:28PM +0200, you wrote:
A) Using the same quotes as in english, i.e., ""
Once again, the english quotes are also stupid:
mv -iv foo bar
`foo' -> `bar'
It is not clear why german users are the only ones who need an "apology"
because they get stupid-looking quotes.
20 matches
Mail list logo
