package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking chromium. This is a large upstream release
with a bunch of security fixes. As has been done for the past few
stable releases, the plan is to push ongoing upstream security update
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
I apologize for this coming right after the previous unblock request.
Upstream released a new large security update yesterday that I had not
anticipated would be out before the stretch window closed, but now
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking chromium ahead of the stretch window
closing. This updates corrects a single security issue that could
lead to remote code execution by visiting a malicious web page.
Best wishes
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking chromium. This updates to the latest
stable upstream security release again and also reenables remote
extensions by default (bug #856183).
Best wishes,
Mike
unblock chromium-bro
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking chromium. This updates to the latest
stable upstream security release with no other changes.
Best wishes,
Mike
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking chromium. This is a large upstream release
like usual with a bunch of security fixes. As is done for jessie, the
plan is to push ongoing upstream security updates to
stretch(-sec
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: transition
severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: lam...@debian.org
Hi,
I would like to request a transition for bind9. Here is the status of the
reverse build dependencies:
bind-dyndb-ldap: a new version is staged in ex
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Yet another data point: Ruby makes stable releases every Christmas
Wine also plans their freeze in the fall now, which ended up in a
release near Christmas this year. If the same holds this year, that
will be too late for the Debian freez
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:19:53AM +, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>>> i wonder if #795227 warrants an upload to jessie-pu (and maybe also to
>>> wheezy-pu
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:19:53AM +, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> i wonder if #795227 warrants an upload to jessie-pu (and maybe also to
>> wheezy-pu) to be fixed with the next point release. We run into that
>> issue at work, when we want
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Graham Inggs wrote:
> If you uploaded 2.3.4-6.2 now, could it cause any harm? At least this
> will get the package built and Release Team can still decide whether
> to grant the unblock request or not.
If you can talk the release team into pre approving an unblock
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> All the builds of motif failed [1] due to a missing symbol. What are we
> going to do? I saw that Graham already choose to just remove the symbol
> from the Ubuntu package. I believe that this is really a no-no,
> especially without
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> That wasn't really the point. The point was more about why not keep
>> the existing patches untouched, but add a final diff that could
>> possibly be reviewable.
>
> so you would feel better if I create my own diff to the current state of
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> because upstream backport patches were done by component for the 2.25 branch,
> and don't have any equivalent to the single patches on the trunk. Feel free
> to
> prove me wrong.
That wasn't really the point. The point was more about why
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> * Configure with --enable-deterministic-archives. Closes: #774429.
#774429 is wishlist, so not appropriate at this point for jessie.
> --- binutils-2.25/debian/patches/series
> +++ binutils-2.25/debian/patches/series
> @@ -34,13 +34,3 @@
>
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Graham Inggs wrote:
> So what is the best way forward?
>
> I have no problems with Michael's upload (thanks!) apart from the delay.
I can reschedule to delayed/0 if as the maintainer you say that's ok.
> Paul and I were just considering adding the line:
> Recommen
n/changelog 2014-10-13 07:27:43.0 +
+++ motif-2.3.4/debian/changelog 2015-04-12 19:34:03.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+motif (2.3.4-6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Disable buggy fix for upstream bug #1565 (closes: #781995).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Sun,
control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thanks for trying, but no, that's not sufficient. I really would
> like having a real use case where the bug gets reproduced without
> “cheating” (for the lack of a better wording), so that we can actually
> chec
control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> It would be nice to compare what happens when one installs gnome/jessie
> vs. gnome/sid. I really wouldn't want this conflict to trigger having
> rdnssd installed and network-manager/gnome not…
Everything seems
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: rm
severity: normal
Please consider removing makehuman from testing. Upstream says the
old version there is not fit for use (#781306).
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
> jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Cyril,
Would it be possible also to unblock ndisc6 in time for RC2? I saw no
prob
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> It would be nice to compare what happens when one installs gnome/jessie
>> vs. gnome/sid. I really wouldn't want this conflict to trigger having
>> rdnssd installed and network-manager/gnome not…
>
> After a su
> It would be nice to compare what happens when one installs gnome/jessie
> vs. gnome/sid. I really wouldn't want this conflict to trigger having
> rdnssd installed and network-manager/gnome not…
After a successful jessie gnome install over ipv6
$ dpkg -l | grep rdnssd
$ dpkg -l | grep network-ma
-maintainer upload by the Security Team.
+ * Fix CVE-2015-1572: incomplete fix for CVE-2015-0247 (closes: #778948).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Sun, 22 Feb 2015 01:50:57 +
+
e2fsprogs (1.42.12-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff -Nru e2fsprogs-1.42.12/debian/patches/CVE-2015-1572
/debian/changelog 2015-02-23 01:08:22.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+wine (1.6.2-20) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Recommend libasound2-plugins (closes: #779002).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:07:16 +
+
wine (1.6.2-19) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix typo in libwine
-9654: more regular expression handling issues.
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:19:14 +
+
icu (52.1-7) unstable; urgency=high
* Patch to CVE-2014-6591, CVE-2014-6585 a font parsing bug.
diff -Nru icu-52.1/debian/patches/CVE-2014-6585.patch icu-52.1/debian/patches/CVE-2014-6585
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Wouldn't that break the installer? ... since netcfg is installing rdnssd
> and network-manager is being installed by default.
I don't see why it would. Yes, rdnssd-udeb is used by netcfg in the
d-i environment but network-manager is not pre
using DNSSEC (closes: #778733).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Thu, 19 Feb 2015 03:42:21 +
+
bind9 (1:9.9.5.dfsg-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* Launch rndc command in the background in networking scripts to avoid a
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- bind9-9.9.5.dfsg.orig/lib/dns/zone.c
+++ bind9
ian/changelog
+++ ndisc6-1.0.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ndisc6 (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Set maintainer to the Debian QA Group (see #713004).
+ * Add conflicts between rdnssd and network-manager (closes: #740998).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:16
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:24 AM:
> You got it all wrong.
So other than the typo s/font/fusion/, I don't really understand that
statement. There were two unstable fusionforge uploads post-freeze
that were in fact accepted into testing [0], and there are no other
proposed changes currently to revie
control: tag -1 moreinfo
control: retitle -1 unblock: matplotlib/1.4.2-3.1
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Looks like this got lost among the floorboards, sorry about that. No, the
> unblock is not realistic right now; could you pick targetted fixes please?
It seems l
control: retitle -1 unblock: cgmanager/0.33-2+deb8u1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. I don't actually have upload rights.
> Should I ask someone to sponsor such a package, or just post the debdiff
> here? (It could be the same as the las
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please consider unblocking kfreebsd-10. It fixes 2 security issues:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/kfreebsd-10
unblock kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn2
control: retitle -1 unblock: gcc-4.8, gcc-4.9, gcc-defaults
control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org
control: usertag -1 unblock
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The only RC fix is #771647, resolving a file conflict in the libphobos
> packages
> built by gcc-4.
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
severity: normal
Please consider unblocking python3.4. The -3 upload is unfortunately
quite big, but there are 2 security issues that are fixed by upstream
changes:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/pytho
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please consider unblocking glibc. It fixes 5 security issues:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/glibc
unblock glibc/2.19
regression in error handling for the server's init script
+(closes: #775834).
+- Thanks to François-Régis Vuillemin.
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:13:19 +
+
isc-dhcp (4.3.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Dynamically link against system bind libraries.
diff --git a/d
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please consider unblocking chromium. This is a new upstream
release that fixes a few security issues.
unblock chromium-browser/40.0.2214.111-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
: buffer overread issues (closes: #774162).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:38:25 +
+
libsndfile (1.0.25-9) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules: Switch from autotools-dev to dh-autoreconf.
diff -Nru libsndfile-1.0.25/debian/patches/CVE-2014-9496.patch libsndfile-1.0.25/debian
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-01-17 20:38, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>> Don't remove the moreinfo tag from this bug when the upload enters t-p-u
>> (unless you have other info to add to the discussion). Leave it there for at
>
; urgency=medium
+
+ * Complete fix for CVE-2014-9485: also handle relative path directory
+traversal condition (closes: #774321).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:35:05 +
+
+minizip (1.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix a directory traversal issue in miniunzip (closes
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please consider unblocking minizip. It fixes a directory traversal
security flaw (bug #774321).
unblock minizip/1.1-5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please consider unblocking chromium. This is a new upstream release
that fixes a bunch of security issues.
unblock chromium-browser/40.0.2214.91-1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rel
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:13:37PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> On 2015-01-17 07:57, martin f krafft wrote:
>> > Christian, I suppose it'll have to be 1.8.10p3-1.1 via t-p-u.
>> > Doable?
>
> Martin,
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I guess this is a request for a TPU upload given 0.21.2-1 is in unstable
> and you (per your follow up mail) want to upload 0.21.1-2?
>
> The change looks reasonable, but the bug #761539 is still open in
> unstable. If this is indeed intended
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock bind9. It fixes an issue where a hang in named could
bring down the entire network #760555.
This only touches files in the bind9 binary package, so nothing in the
udebs has
control: usertag -1 -unblock +rm
control: retitle -1 RM: tcos/0.89.93
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765129#91 also suggests
> that the package doesn't really work afterwards and that we might be better
> not shipping it.
.
+ * Switch libxmlrpc build-dependency order (closes: #765129).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:33:56 +
+
tcos (0.89.93) unstable; urgency=low
* Bump standards version to 3.9.4, no changes needed
diff -Nru tcos-0.89.93/debian/control tcos-0.89.93+deb8u1/debian/control
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
The upstream developer wants it to not ship with jessie. I guess the
reasoning is somewhat questionable, but it's what has been asked for
in #771505.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock chromium-browser. It fixes some security issues and
fixes two RC issues: removing some non-free files and displaying info
about lack of support for < sse2.
Also a couple imp
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+wine-development (1.7.29-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix upstream texture corruption bug (closes: #770483).
+ * Add libgl1-mesa-dri recommends to wine32 (closes: #771613).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:53:30 +
+
+wine-development (1.7.29-3) unstable
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Please unblock wine. An RC issue is fixed, an important dependency on
>> i386 is added, and binfmt set up is documented.
>
> Unblocked.
Thanks! :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock wine. An RC issue is fixed, an important dependency on
i386 is added, and binfmt set up is documented.
unblock wine/1.6.2-17
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-re
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> guake (0.5.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>* debian/patches
>> + fix_floating_point_exception.diff patch
>> + floating point exception when system fixed font set. Closes:
>> #761430
>
> Your works looks fine, but unf
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best
> solution would be to remove torque completely for jessie (i.e. first
> drop support from openmpi to be able to remove the package and
> remaining reverse dependencies).
pdate packaging standards.
+ * Remove binutils-gold build conflict (closes: #749957).
+ * Build-depend openjdk-7 >= 7u71-2.5.3-1 (closes: #761269).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert Mon, 13 Oct 2014 06:05:00 +
+
lwjgl (2.7.1+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
* add java bin dir to the PATH env
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 10.10.2014 um 06:39 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
>> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 23:01 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>> Note that the window for the next stable update is closing in about a
>>> week, so there isn'
Hi,
I would like to ask for your opinion about uploading a newer gcc
version to wheezy?
This is to be able to continue building chromium security updates,
which has been discussed with the release team [0]. They've requested
that I discuss it with gcc maintainers, which is the reason for this
me
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try
> and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages,
> but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon.
>
> That doesn't make the timing issu
control: tag -1 -moreinfo
control: unblock -1 by 740495
control: unblock -1 by 757384
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Are we (really) ready for this? Removal of lcms in testing would break
> several packages including gimp and libmagickcore-dev[1]
lcms no longer has any r
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 16:00 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> chromium 38 is currently planning to drop support for all compilers
>> less than gcc 4.8 (and all clang not built aga
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Well, someone could attempt to persuade upstream to delay the change, or
> work on fixing things up to work with 4.7 where required.
Starting with chromium 38, they're using C++ features only implemented
in gcc >= 4.8, and it seems like the
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Severity: normal
Tags: security
chromium 38 is currently planning to drop support for all compilers
less than gcc 4.8 (and all clang not built against >= gcc 4.8). So
wheezy will soon have no way to compile an u
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 15:53:40 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been working with hartmans to get some updates to krb5 into Debian (he
>> is pretty busy these days, and I'm at upstream). A couple of issues are
>> serio
control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
control: retitle -1 RM: wine-doc -- ROM; obsolete package
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> If the package is obsolete, should it be removed from unstable?
Yes, reassigning.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.deb
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove src:wine-doc from testing. It's no longer provided
upstream as a tarball. The the wine packages now have a url included
in the README.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove src:lcms from testing. Some reverse dependencies still
need to be migrated to lcms2 (see #717928).
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.de
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 12:58 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> It's now after. How would you like me to approach this?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertags 704566 = pu
> tags 704566 = wheezy
> retitle 704566 pu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u4
> tags 704426 + wheezy-ignore
> usertags 704426 + wheezy-can-defer
> thanks
>
>
> On 13.04.2013 17
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Julien asked me about running piuparts tests for i386 (especially for
> the multiarch-support libc6 dependency) ... I patched piuparts a bit to
> support doing this on an amd64 host and started running distupgrade
> tests now. squeez
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
>
> Please consider removing gnustep-dl2. It seems to be incompatible
> with gobjc 4.7 (bug #705602
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing openvpn-auth-ldap. It seems to be incompatible
with gobjc 4.7 (bug #641811). It has no reverse dependencies.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing gnustep-dl2. It seems to be incompatible
with gobjc 4.7 (bug #705602). It has no reverse dependencies.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ.
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing dovecot-solr. It's had an open RC bug
(#704422) for three weeks now and no activity at all except for the
bug submission. It has no reverse-dependencies and has never b
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package chromium-browser
Please unblock chromium-browser. It fixes a lot of security issues,
and new upstream versions will be continually uploaded during wheezy's
release cy
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing xgraph. The package contains non-free code
(bug #705152). There is mention in the bug traffic that removing the
PW code may be easy, but looking it over a bit, it proba
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:21:52PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> I've attached a proposed patch-using patch, and will wait for an ack.
>>
>
> Thanks, please go
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing tomboy-latex. The current version is
incompatible with tomboy in testing (bug #705314). The only way to
fix this situation is to bring a new upstream version into testi
control: retitle -1 unblock: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u5
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> (sorry for the delay, which was to avoid a rash reply)
> (quotes have been re-ordered)
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:12:15PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Gilbert (03/04/2013):
>> So, yeah I'm of course aware of the freeze policy by now...
>
> Feel free to learn about the tpu “dogma” now; thank you very much.
Thank you.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:07:44PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Please unblock package isc-dhcp
>>
>> This upload fixes a security issue in the embedded bind library. It's
>> a bit large due to t
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package isc-dhcp
This upload fixes a security issue in the embedded bind library. It's
a bit large due to the addition of a secondary patch system for
patching bind issues.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
>
> On 29.03.2013 15:01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
>> bind9 (1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu1) unstable; urgency=high
>> .
>>* Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team.
>>* Fix cve-2012-5689: issue in nam
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I do not like this pattern of unannounced removal requests without
> consulting maintainers. In these two cases I probably agree with the
> intention, but not with the way you are going about it.
>
> I also really dislike your recent hab
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove tcos (RC bug #694870). It has no reverse-dependencies
and has yet to be included in a stable release.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debi
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove rinputd. It fails to install (#581999) and has no
reverse-dependencies.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
>> I won't upload this myself. IcedTea 7-2.3 uses two hotspot versions, one for
>> the
>> zero ports, one for the hotspot runtimes. From my point of view it would be
>> good
>> to update to a 7-2.[45] with a unified hotspot version capable to build both
>> zero and hotspot, and keep the current 7
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 01.03.2013 04:35, schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
>> Backporting security fixes with Java has turned out to be more of less
>> unfeasible. I tried this once with DSA 2507 and I think that amounted to at
>> least
>> two man days of work for tha
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing libnet-twitter-perl. The current twitter API
is being disable this month requiring large changes to the codebase
(bug #702486, which are likely unacceptable at this poin
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing libnet-twitter-lite-perl. The current
twitter API is being disable this month requiring large changes to the
codebase (bug #702523), which are likely unacceptable at thi
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> As was brought up recently, owncloud is anticipated to be a nightmare
> security-wise during wheezy's lifetime:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/03/msg00042.html
>
> It has yet to land in a stable releas
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Anyway, assuming things get figured out and fixed in a timely manner,
> this removal request can happily go away.
My opinion is that things aren't moving fast enough. Some fixes were
uploaded (only) to experimental and new issu
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package
> management
> stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those
> old components are still in wheezy however, and especially update-m
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2013-03-06, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>> Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
>>> being worked on (
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
and has yet to be included in a stable release.
Thanks,
M
package: release.debian.org
severity: normal
Bugs #699301 and #699304 are about non-free sRGB files. #699305,
#699306, etc.about the same issue recently got marked wheezy-ignore. I
believe these bugs should get the same treatment.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ..
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please consider removing haskell-tls-extra. The security backport
caused a regression that pretty much completely breaks the package
(#701593), and the upstream bug log seems to indicate a lack
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove python-selenium. It doesn't work at all for the
browsers that it is supposed to support (bug #700061). It also has
yet to be included in a stable release and has no
reverse-depend
>> That means somebody needs to get it to build on arm{el,hf}, or get the
>> binaries removed, though.
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=chromium-browser
>
> Guiseppe, Michael?
>
> IMO, if there's no official upstream support for arm by upstream, we should
> drop arm support to prev
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> I'm skeptical that owncloud should be shipped in Wheezy. It has
> frequent security issues and the initial maintainers appear to
> be inactive, all updates after October have been NMUs...
I agree. Let's remove it until its demonstrably s
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
