Bug#405863: dict: default server doesn't respond

2007-01-06 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: dict Version: 1.10.2-3 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, Rickard E. Faith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debbugs-Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, Rickard E. Faith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The default conffile /etc/dictd/dict.conf uses "server dict.org", which recent

Bug#402855: xchat: (generated?) config file line causes BadAlloc crash

2006-12-12 Thread Justin Pryzby
Package: xchat Version: 2.6.8-0.2 Severiy: important The following line was found in my .xchat/xchat.conf: gui_win_height = 65528 It causes the following message to stderr after selecting a server to which to connect: |The program 'xchat' received an X Window System error. |This probably reflec

bad debhelper code ignoring errors; packages not updated

2006-12-12 Thread Justin Pryzby
lintian.d.o isn't updated yet to include the test, but lintian 1.23.16 and later includes a test for debhelper-generated maintscript code of the form: foo || exit 0 which was intended to be foo || exit $? but included too few s. This is a notable problem with some current testing packages

naming of nonpublic shared library tktable

2006-06-24 Thread Justin Pryzby
I'm preparing a new release of tktable, to fix 368795. I still don't know the best way of naming the packages. The filename, as built by the upstream, is libTktable2.9.so, without a soname and without any symlinks. My intent for the most recent upload was: Source: tktable Package: tktable-2.9 P

usertags for invoke-rc.d bugs

2006-05-18 Thread Justin Pryzby
# Lacking a better idea for which user to set, and not sure that # -release cares, I'm tagging these for myself. usertag 162581 invoke-rc.d usertag 162688 invoke-rc.d usertag 165135 invoke-rc.d usertag 229972 invoke-rc.d usertag 230536 invoke-rc.d usertag 243159 invoke-rc.d usertag 262622 invoke-rc

can't parse the etch rc policy

2006-03-16 Thread Justin Pryzby
The etch rc release policy [0] says, regarding log files: "they shouldn't fail if the package is removed-but-not-purged" But I can't parse that; what is "they" ? Justin [0] http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

requesting testing removal of saoimage (was Re: Processed: Re: Is Tinguaro Barreno Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA; OR, Can we remove saoimage?)

2006-02-11 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:30:50AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:26:43PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:24:18AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 06:18:09PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking S

glibc pts: "as requested by freeze"

2005-08-12 Thread Justin Pryzby
Why does http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/glibc.html say Not touching package, as requested by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed) ? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]