Holger Wansing wrote:
> I would suggest this change:
>
>
> By subscribing to the Debian announcement mailing list, you will receive a
I don't much like this, though I'm not sure it matters: pedantically,
you don't receive notifications by subscribing, you receive them by
being/remaining subsc
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Minor changes have been done in installing.dbk (mostly dropping text)
> and one addition in release-notes.dbk. I think we can consider this
> frozen now.
I was going to say "wait, a couple more things" - but it looks as if
all the low-priority checks I had on my TODO-list have
Niels Thykier wrote:
>> How about upgrading.dbk and whatsnew.dbk?
>
> Hi,
>
> The "upgrading.dbk" historically had release-specific content "hidden"
> deeply within selected sections. In stretch we took an effort to
> extract that to "issues.dbk" so the "routined" administrator would only
> have
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear all,
(I'm dropping just debian-i18n)
[...]
> * l10n-english could do a review of the current text of all chapters,
> keeping in mind that especially the issues.dbk file will keep receiving
> updates during the releasing process, so the other files make more sense
> to ch
Holger Levsen wrote:
> adding debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org to cc: to get feedback and advice.
>
> On Montag, 15. Dezember 2014, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> diff -Nru macchanger-1.7.0/debian/po/templates.pot
>> macchanger-1.7.0/debian/po/templates.pot
Is this only in the git version o
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> It's not clear that that's true for this release; it's what I've
>> always used (and its full-screen mode has given me some painless
>> test Lenny-to-Squeeze upgrades), but I've seen claims on
>> debian-devel or somewhere that apt's resolver is currently more
>> robust.
>
I'll treat this and Thomas Goirand's rewrite as separate requests
for review and let someone else decide how to merge them.
Ben Finney wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
>> | 4.7.4. Upgrading with Xen installed, and Kernel enumeration order issue
>> with
>> | Xen
>
> For a section title in the
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Right. Changed. Attached is the new text, please re-read and let me know
> what you think.
>
> Thomas
> 4.7.4. Upgrading with Xen installed, and Kernel enumeration order issue with
> Xen
What you mean is:
4.7.4. Xen upgrades
> In Lenny, using grub legacy, the default
8 matches
Mail list logo
