Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi guys,
As gnome-shell isn't in s390x anymore and is required for the installation (but
not the build) of gnome-shell-pomodoro, Jeremy suggested in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnome-shell-pomodoro/merge_requests/2 that I
release a new version that bui
Hi Adam,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 2:29 PM Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> If packages need removing on particular architectures, that needs to
> happen in unstable, via an ftp.debian.org removal bug.
Makes sense. Thanks!
Joseph
Hi guys,
As gnome-shell isn't in s390x anymore and is required for the
installation (but not the build) of gnome-shell-pomodoro, Jeremy
suggested in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnome-shell-pomodoro/merge_requests/2
that I release a new version that build-depend on gnome-shell (which I
did yes
Hi!
> thanks a lot, but what about backports. On backports we still need this
> mapping.
Aren't the backports built using the dh-python version of the platform
they are ported to? In this case it shouldn't really matter right?
I see that Ubuntu released a new dh-python with this exact fix. It
se
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gnome-shell-pomodoro
The new version that has been in unstable for 15 days fixes:
- 1 important bug #860149 that affects greatly the usability of the
application
-
5 matches
Mail list logo
