-bsnes-mercury/094+git20220807-8
git show --stat:
commit 8fa1fad276c3ede227c0c70037a486e2ef23fa96 (HEAD -> master, tag:
debian/094+git20220807-8)
Author: Jonathan McDowell
Date: Thu May 11 10:48:30 2023 +
Fix Kodi plugins buttonmap.xml location (Closes: #1034583)
The buttonmap.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 03:23:01PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 02-03-2023 10:30, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > This is a prerequest, before uploading to unstable. The package has
> > already passed through NEW and is available in experimental.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
] I have reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach diff against the package in testing
TBD:
unblock sg3-utils/1.46-3
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 6aeaa17..9ba46b1 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+sg3-utils (1.46-3) unstable;
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 08:07:09AM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 09:11:46PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On 25-02-2023 14:30, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > With the bookworm-ignore for #994758,
> >
> > I'll admit that I misjudged that bu
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 09:11:46PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags 994758 - bookworm-ignore
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Thanks for caring.
>
> On 25-02-2023 14:30, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > With the bookworm-ignore for #994758,
>
> I'll admit that I misjudged that bug; with this message I'll clea
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: keyring-ma...@debian.org
Please unblock package debian-keyring
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team to judge the request efficiently.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: keyring-ma...@debian.org
Please unblock package debian-keyring
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team to judge the request efficiently.
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 10:18:03AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 19:03, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > unblock libserialport/0.1.1-3
>
> I'm assuming this bug was meant as a pre-approval request for 0.1.1-4.
> Please
021-07-10 17:21:59.0
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libserialport (0.1.1-4) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Avoid the use of termiox now the kernel has dropped support for it.
+Thanks to Tim Small. (Closes: #990863)
+
+ -- Jonathan McDowell Sat, 10 Jul 2021 17:21:59 +0100
+
libserialport (0.
e, so I asked an explicit unblock).
keyring-maint have historically tried to do a keyring update as close to
the release as possible, and this has always had an unblock in the past;
jessie has 2015.04.10 (release date: 2014-04-26) and stretch has
2017.05.28 (release date: 2017-06-17). If we've missed it this time then
so be it.
J.
--
Revd Jonathan McDowell, ULC | Don't hit the keys so hard, it hurts.
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 09:25:46PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Thanks to Adam, Julien, Jonathan, Matthias, Scott, Simon and many
> others, we are ready to migrate the bulk of the GCC-5 transition and
> related sub-transitions to testing tonight. Apologise for the short
> notice.
I continue to b
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package debian-keyring
This doesn't fix any RC bugs, but it represents the current state of the
keyring as of the DPL election and generally provides a more up to
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:31:02PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2013 01:13 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Monday 10 June 2013 08:52 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> >> > On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>> >> For the record, the window for gettin
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 12:54:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 17:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 June 2013 05:28 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > I can't see anything on
> > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mult
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:55:33PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Saturday 25 May 2013 05:13 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > I've just hit this myself upgrading a server to wheezy and can't see any
> > sign of more recent packages in the archive yet. Is it likel
On Monday 8th April 2013 22:04 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Monday 08 April 2013 02:43 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
> >> Just to re-confirm, is the actual bug, that was initially reported by
> >> Guy, is that also resolved?
> > Yes the bug is resolved. No more errors when "update-initramfs -u"
> >
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package debian-keyring
This doesn't fix any RC bugs, but does add the debian-nonupload keyring,
remove the PGPV3 keyring (currently an empty file to ease upgrades
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:38:59PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jonathan McDowell:
>
> > I'd like to upload a new onak package to stable to fix #520117 by
> > rebuilding against db4.5 instead of db4.6 - I'm hitting what seems to be
> > #510270 in db4.6.
>
bdb4.5 rather than libdb4.6 (Closes: #520117)
+
+ -- Jonathan McDowell Fri, 29 May 2009 13:59:03 +0100
+
onak (0.3.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -u onak-0.3.6/debian/control onak-0.3.6/debian/control
--- onak-0.3.6/debian/control
+++ onak-0.3.6/debian/control
@@
Dear darling release team; please consider unblocking
debian-keyring_2009.01.18 so that it may pass into testing when its 10
days are up. While it does not resolve any release critical bugs it is
purely a data package and will mean that we ship with something that
more accurately represents the DDs
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:59:42AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 07:31:37PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > The full upstream diff is at:
> >
> > http://the.earth.li/~noodles/onak-1to2-full.diff (5157 lines)
> >
> > The diff exclu
Please consider onak 0.3.2-1 for testing, once the usual 10 day testing
period is over.
I do appreciate this release doesn't fix any bug filed against Debian,
but I am also upstream and the release is a bugfix release which I
believe it's in Debian's interests to have as part of sarge - I've had
t
22 matches
Mail list logo
