7.8/debian/changelog 2023-09-04 15:07:26.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dar (2.7.8-2) bookworm; urgency=high
+
+ * Include a patch that can prevent issues with creating isolated catalogs
+with dar built using gcc 12 or newer. Closes: #1050663.
+
+ -- John Goerzen Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:07:26 -0
nk reassembly.
+ * Tweak postinst to not generate an error if the nncp user was
+previously created by the user.
+
+ -- John Goerzen Sat, 29 Apr 2023 10:25:52 -0500
+
nncp (8.8.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload
diff -Nru nncp-8.8.2/debian/nncp.postinst nncp-8.8.2/debian/nncp.posti
On 10/25/2010 09:58 PM, John Goerzen wrote:
Release folks,
twidge 1.0.6 was just accepted into unstable.
I should have added that it fixes grave bug #601427, which complains of
this issue.
-- John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
rs of identi.ca.
No other changes.
Thanks,
-- John Goerzen
[1] http://github.com/jgoerzen/twidge/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
[2]
http://github.com/jgoerzen/twidge/commit/9421da8999efb3322e86c30f8f026af3529576e3
[3]
http://github.com/jgoerzen/twidge/commit/d5e6e32fdac5adb367b7e2f4250f58d1d1d
Hi,
I uploaded Twidge 1.0.5 to unstable a few days ago. When Twitter rolled
out OAuth, they also -- on some of their servers -- made a change that
deprecated the old URLs that Twidge was written against. As a result,
Twidge broke for some (but not all) users. Version 1.0.5 corrects this
pr
Hi,
Bacula 5.0.2-2 was uploaded to unstable 11 days ago. It fixes an
upgrade-blocking bug #591293 by commenting out one line in a database
upgrade script. That is the only change from the version in testing.
-- John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Twidge now depends on hoauth. hoauth depends on haskell-curl, which is
broken on powerpc. Joachim Breitner pointed this out to me, since it's
preventing twidge from migrating to testing.
I went to file a bug on ftp.debian.org and it suggested I email you instead.
So, please remove twidge on
Can someone tell me why this happened?
FWIW, I uploaded 2.12-6 to unstable to fix the GHC migration, and it
hasn't migrated. There are no RC bugs on washngo.
Thanks,
-- John
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:39:17PM +, Debian testing watch wrote:
> FYI: The status of the washngo source package
>
Hi folks,
I'd like to request that bacula 2.4.4-1 and bacula-doc 2.4.4-1 (two
separate source packages) be hinted into lenny.
Compared to Bacula 2.4.3-1, currently in lenny, 2.4.4-1:
* Is a bugfix-only release upstream, which integrates many patches we
already carried from them against 2.4.3
Luk Claes wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I received bug#509184 today. It was reported against a version of
>> bacula in backports, but applies to the version in lenny as well (though
>> not the version in sid).
>>
>> The bug in question
Hi,
I received bug#509184 today. It was reported against a version of
bacula in backports, but applies to the version in lenny as well (though
not the version in sid).
The bug in question is a double-free and does not appear to be a
security hole. It results in a crash of the entire backup syst
Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I was diving through the list of rc bugs and stumbled across
> #496174. Appearently there has been an unblock request by luk for
> version 2.4.2-3 of this package. But in the meantime there has been an
> upload 2.4.2-3.1. Additional to that I would like to
Luk Claes wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Pygopherd 2.0.18.2 has been uploaded to sid. It fixes rc bug #475376 by
>> correctly removing a non-free RFC from the source package. That is the
>> only difference from 2.0.18.1, already in lenny.
>>
Hi,
Pygopherd 2.0.18.2 has been uploaded to sid. It fixes rc bug #475376 by
correctly removing a non-free RFC from the source package. That is the
only difference from 2.0.18.1, already in lenny.
I had tried to fix that prior to the freeze, but made a typo. I've
verified this version is correc
se CC me on replies as I am not subscribed to this list.
Thanks,
-- John Goerzen
bacula (2.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=high
* Fix sed pattern in debian/rules to correctly remove
'USE ${db_name};' from the MySQL command tables. This prevented
bacula-director-mysql from being ins
According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-configfile.html,
tere are two reasons it hasn't migrated: bug #429486 and being out of
date on s390.
Strangely, bug #429486 has been marked closed for ages, and this package
is marked not-for-us on s390.
Can anyone help me figure out what's goi
Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> libghc6-hdbc-sqlite3-dev
> libhugs-hdbc-sqlite3
> hpodder (which is the only reverse dependency)
Makes sense to me.
-- John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> John: are you able to upload libarchive with this patch to revert to
> libarchive1 or can I have your permission to upload the NMU to the
> delayed queue (or even direct to unstable) this week instead of next?
I plan to upload it wit
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:27:48AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > patch that reverts the SONAME change in the autotools by breaking the
> > link between the upstream version string and the library version info
> > and setting version info directly.
>
> I would instead leave the upstream code alo
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:16:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> the normal way and disregard the version in NEW. If that's really not
> possible, the next best would be to upload a .4 to unstable that fixes the
> RC bugs for that branch, and then accept .3 from NEW.
I have uploaded a .4 to unst
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:16:31PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It also doesn't seem to fit with the policy for t-p-u, which is that uploads
> should include a minimal diff against testing because there's approximately
It is a minimal diff (the patches are included in the bugs fixed, but I
could
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:51:09AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have prepared an update to dfsbuild that fixes 2 RC bugs: #404563 and
> > #404555.
>
> If your final patches look like the two patches in
Hello,
I have prepared an update to dfsbuild that fixes 2 RC bugs: #404563 and
#404555.
Due to Haskell library changes in sid that weren't ready in time for
etch, this package will not be buildable in sid.
Therefore, my understanding is that I need to upload dfsbuild 0.99.3 to
testing-proposed
Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:02:02 +0000
To: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gpsbabel_1.3.2-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted:
gpsbabel_1.3.2-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gpsbabel/gpsbabel_1.3.2-2.diff.g
t was removed in
the first place.
-- John
- Forwarded message from Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:31:24 -0600 (CST)
Reply-To: Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
OTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/27/06, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Looking on packages.qa.debian.org, I'm seeing some confusing
>> information and am hoping someone can help me figure out what's going
>> on.
>>
>> The b
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 12:00:37AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > I saw on the wiki page a mention that HP sells new systems at insane
> > prices. Bu
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> following hppa and ia64, I've started a wiki page to start collecting
> info for the Alpha requalification for etch:
> http://wiki.debian.org/alphaEtchReleaseRecertification
Thanks, Falk, for the effort. I find it difficult to keep
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050620 05:47]:
> > Not everyone can be in an IRC discussion. There are pesky things like
> > sleep, work, and Real Life that mean that it's not possible for
> > everyon
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:39:23AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Ok, convinced. No more minutes to debian-release. If we want to present
> > properly, we need to take time to polish the mails. Minutes will be
> > hidden in future to avoid misunderstandings. I hope that you'
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:56:47AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> So, you are not accepting my drupal_4.5.3-1 (or -2) package into sarge
> because 4.5.3 fixes more than cited security issue?
Why are you not using the simple patch available at
http://dr
31 matches
Mail list logo