Re: potato kernels and debian-cd

;2.0.36/2.2.10/2.2.12/2.2.13 should all be removed. I don't think we should have any 2.0 kernel binary in potato. -- Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian GNU/Linux Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://web.espy.org/> http://www.debian.org/>

Re: Grave concerns on releasing alpha with the rest of potato

bc changeover. 2.1.3-4 is in incoming, if you'd build that ASAP, I'd appreciate it. -- Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian GNU/Linux Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://web.espy.org/> http://www.debian.org/>

Re: [non-i386 people needed] Proposed packages for 2.1r4

At 16:11 + 1999-11-24, Vincent Renardias wrote: > [*] kernel-source-2.2.5_2.2.5-2_i386.changes > - needed for SMP machines, fixes lots of bugs, source-only package. > [OK] Strongly disagree, 2.2.5 has a lot of bugs, some of them security related. -- Joel Klecker

Re: stable with 2.2.11 (was Re: Stable release management)

d the time of the slink release, I mentioned on one of the libc lists that Debian/sparc was releasing with 2.0.105, Ulrich Drepper responded along the lines of "that's stupid, there have been a lot of bug fixes since then". -- Joel Klecker (aka Espy)Debian G