On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:25:29AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:04:44PM +0000, Joel Baker wrote:
> >
> >The simple answer would be to make sure that we have a reasonable selection
> >of two "disks" (for individual burns or dual-sided sin
me time.
> This doesn't have anything to do with dual-layer DVDs, of course.
Probably so; I was just proposing that we make it possible to generate
images in "easy" increments of 1 DVD layer or 2 DVD layers and let whomever
is doing the burning choose their pa
ke it easy for folks wanting to burn or press
single-sided dual-layer discs from those such that it requires no user
intervention to read the total (I don't know enough about the gritty
details of bridging filesystems across layers to know what this requires).
--
Joe
require binutils >= 2.15, then the bug should be
updated; if it does, an RC severity is correct, I should think.
The reason seems adequite to me; it's only the correctness which I can't
verify just offhand.
--
Joel Baker <[EM
be taken care of, even if the way to do that is to cede
> > responsibility for the package.
>
> Again, the RC ranking is arbitral. I personaly believe that other bugs of
> the advi package are more important, than this FTBFS, and was working in
> my
5 matches
Mail list logo
