On 23-Apr-2000 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 03:42:06AM -0700, Jim Westveer écrivait:
>>
>> There by removing ALL 2.2.14 images from the resulting .iso
>
> No, please check what you're telling... this is output while doing make
> status. It t
2.2.14 kernels,
except in the boot-image
[ Jim scratches his head, and decides to go to bed ]
--
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with sendmail.cf.
"It never does quite what I w
On 20-Apr-2000 Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 07:34:11AM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote:
>> I understand that one does not want to update the stable tree
>> without documenting the changes, but the current errors
>> in 2.1r5 are procluding the creation of .
want to update the stable tree
without documenting the changes, but the current errors
in 2.1r5 are procluding the creation of .iso's because of this
dependancy problem.
(Critical bug:#62169: ftp.debian.org 2.1r5/6 issues: w3-el,
security and ChangeLog; 9 days old ) I also reported the
pr
installed?? (The "old"==current?
> version was/is breaking CD creation.)
NOPE, the updated w3-el-e20 was moved into 'slink-proposed-updates' so
cd-creation is still broken. It needed to be moved into the main archive!
Actually there are a number of files in slink-p
dy been installed?? (The "old"==current?
> version was/is breaking CD creation.)
NOPE The w3-el-e20 was moved into "proposed updates" for some reason.
--
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Bother,&q
Phil,
It still is in Incomming.
I wrote to Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and he responded:
>On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
>
>> There is a new version of w3-el-e20 in incomming that fixes
>> a depends error when generating 2.1r5 CD images.
>>
7 matches
Mail list logo
