algorithm of the
test (which is what you are suggesting), you invalidate any test which at
any time used that algorithm.
> Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:26:05 +0200
> To: Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.deb
itical. I hope very
careful thought is applied and the release manager is involved in that
thinking process when it is decided whether a package gets in or does
not get in. Debian will not be truely stable without that.
-Jim
---
Jim Lynch Finger for pgp key
as Laney College CIS admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.laney.edu/~jim/
as Debian developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/~jwl/
Hi.
> Date:Thu, 20 Apr 2000 18:28:11 EDT
> To: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> debian-release@lists.debian.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From:Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Preparing for first test cycle
>
> Uggh, can you m
t I also think
it is probably too expensive to abort the test. Unless it can be postponed
for a very short time, say 4-7 days. There's still abt. 12 days in front
of May 2 tho. Maybe there's still time to get the kernel with its patch in?
-Jim
---
Jim Lynch Finger for pgp
4 matches
Mail list logo