On 01/09/07 11:50, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:49:19PM -0800, Jeff Carr wrote:
>> I've not seen conclusive evidence that the keyspan firmware file is
>> not the best effort of freeness.
>
> "This firmware may not be modified and may only b
On 01/08/07 17:47, Sam Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:49:19 -0800, Jeff Carr wrote:
>> On 01/06/07 10:13, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>> In linux.debian.devel.release Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> So keyspan USB devices will be useless with De
On 01/06/07 14:44, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 01:19:01PM -0800, Jeff Carr wrote:
>> This doesn't have anything to do with legality. You can legally
>> distribute these drivers.
>
> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Langasek
On 01/06/07 10:13, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> In linux.debian.devel.release Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So keyspan USB devices will be useless with Debian kernels in the very
>> near future, since there is no alternative to the kernel driver?
> Looks so. But we will have the most free ke
On 01/05/07 13:54, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today Bastian Blank and I finished the preparations to release the next
> linux-2.6 package with an orig.tar.gz complying with the GR2006-007.
>
> The following drivers will be completely removed from the next upload,
> because they contai
On 10/17/06 15:06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 03:49:25PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> The answer to the question in the subject is simple: NO.
>
> Thankyou for your opinion. I note you seemed to neglect to mention that
> you're not a lawyer.
I agree.
Out of curiosity, I
On 08/02/06 22:17, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Start with drivers/char/drm/mga_ucode.h. This is distributable, because it's
> under
> a BSD license, but it's not free software, because there's no source code.
There is no source code, because there never was any source code.
What do you think sho
7 matches
Mail list logo
