Re: Bug#502761: I suggest removing the call to emacspeakconfig and add a mention in README.Debian

2008-11-20 Thread James R. Van Zandt
t the debconf changes to the 26.0 package. - Jim Van Zandt > Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:33:28 -0600 > From: Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:09:15PM -0500, James R. Van Zandt wrote: >

Re: unblock adjtimex (testing *and* unstable)

2008-08-18 Thread James R. Van Zandt
You wrote: > > I don't understand the status of the package. I uploaded 1.25-1 on Aug > 10: > > > > adjtimex_1.25-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost > > > the dak log says: > 20080810170202|process-unchecked|rejected|adjtimex_1.25-1_i386.changes > > You should

unblock adjtimex (testing *and* unstable)

2008-08-18 Thread James R. Van Zandt
/* we assume we're not running on a PS/2, where century is +in byte 55 */ tm.tm_year = cmos_read_bcd(9)+100*cmos_read_bcd(50)-1900; - } - while (tm.tm_sec != cmos_read_bcd (0)); + } while (tm.tm_sec != cmos_read_bcd (0)); } tm.tm_isdst = -1;

Re: Bug#56059: Definitive package list for 2.1r5...

2000-01-27 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Hmm. The distribution list seems a bit excessive, since this build problem is with the slink NMU version only. The debian/rules in versions 1.7 and later don't have the problem. Since my development system is now potato, a second NMU to fix the rules problem would be fine with me. Then, feel f