Bug#1093902: several binNMUs for bugs found on amd64.reproduce.debian.net

Adding my support for this too; I don't use a lot of Haskell packages myself, but binNMUs for these packages would make a material difference to overall Debian amd64 reproducibility[1] -- getting the suite to almost-or-more-than-90% rebuildable by anyone independently. (...and thereby making the e

Bug#1035543: init-system-helpers: new systemd units may not get enabled on upgrades from bullseye if systemd is installed

Followup-For: Bug #1035543 X-Debbugs-Cc: ty...@mit.edu, bi...@debian.org, hel...@subdivi.de, jspri...@debian.org, ans...@debian.org, a...@debian.org, debian.bugrep...@wodny.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org [ re-introducing the larger cc list audience, plus debian-release ] Would reverting t

Re: Bug#1005863: gcc-11: invalid opcode for Geode LX on i386

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 07:22, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:47:21PM +, James Addison wrote: > > Would it be fair to raise the severity of this bug to a release-critical > > level? > > No, it would be fair to remove Geode LX from the set of suppor

Bug#1005863: gcc-11: invalid opcode for Geode LX on i386

Package: gcc-11 Followup-For: Bug #1005863 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-pol...@lists.debian.org Hi folks, Bug #1005863 describes a gcc-11 behaviour that results in software that exits ungracefully on Geode LX i686 hardware. Despite self-repo

Re: bookworm release date?

Hi Adam, On Thu, 09 Mar 2023 17:05:28 +, Adam wrote: > ftp-master have now published their bookworm keys, so we can get those > incorporated. For the SRM side, you probably saw that we've been > considering moving to an EC key. From the very limited responses to the > discussion I started on d