Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package perdition
Perdition 1.19~rc4-1 includes several important fixes and I would like it
considered for inclusion in Squeeze. As it coincides with an upstream
r
ending on status of newly introduced breakage in .14 and such.
> >
> > I vote for the later.
>
> Hehe, but this does suppose we create now another branch and start porting the
> patches and configs, i see nobody volunteering to do that.
I vote for not creating another breach
else has. (I do have a
> This is where these threads usually end...
With one of your terse one-liners?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:11:34AM -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Horms wrote:
>
> >Excellent. Kernels outside the d-k repo are already out in the cold.
> >I don't see that moving forward with this makes their situation
> >any better, or any wors
rce-2.6.12_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz
> cd kernel-source-2.6.12-2.6.12/
> svn export svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/branches/linux-kernel-2.6.12/debian
>
> and rock! :)
Excellent. Kernels outside the d-k repo are already out in the cold.
I don't see that moving forward with this makes thei
merge those changes into kernel-source-2.4.27
(obviously for a future, non-sarge r0 release) please
feel free to do so.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:33:10AM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
> Horms,
>
> Here's FreeRADIUS 1.0.2-4 for sponsorship. It's a set of security fixes
> SQL driver, one a two-byte buffer overflow, and one an SQL injection
> attack.
>
> I've already discussed t
a remote exploit, and that needs to be
taken into due consideration.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ils is too old for that package (if the version numbering is
> in sync). @kernel-team: Would it be possible to work with the old
> shellutils for the upgrade?
Probably not, though I am not entirely sure what you are asking.
You want to install a kernel package that was built for sarge on woody?
--
Horms
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 03:47:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:57:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> > There is a new kernel-source-2.4.26 package, 2.4.26-4
> > and a new kernel-image-2.4.26-i386 package, also 2.4.26-4.
> > There are no changes to
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 12:15:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Horms,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:14:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:50:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wr
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Horms,
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:14:34PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:50:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > it was a pci "fix" patch from Herbert Xu that b0rk
12 matches
Mail list logo
