2.6.33-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kamalesh Babulal
powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch
Commit: c2be05481f6125254c45b78f334d4dd09c701c82 upstream
crash_kexec_wait_realmode() is defined only if CONFIG_P
2.6.33-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kamalesh Babulal
powerpc/kexec: Add ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64 to PPC64 code
This patch introduces PPC64 specific #ifdef bits from the upstream
commit: b3df895aebe091b1657a42a8c859bd49fc9
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kamalesh Babulal
powerpc/kexec: Add ifdef CONFIG_PPC_STD_MMU_64 to PPC64 code
This patch introduces PPC64 specific #ifdef bits from the upstream
commit: b3df895aebe091b1657a42a8c859bd49fc9
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Kamalesh Babulal
powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch
Commit: c2be05481f6125254c45b78f334d4dd09c701c82 upstream
crash_kexec_wait_realmode() is defined only if CONFIG_P
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:28:49PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Can you please pull the powerpc build failure fixes
> patch series into 2.6.32-stable.
No, I don't "pull" any patches into a stable tree. Especially as you
didn't even give me a git tree to pull from :)
I'll
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:56:52PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Resending the patch with commit id and message included. Please let
> me know, incase the patch needs any other changes to be made.
What is the proper Subject: of this patch?
>
> powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shut
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:41:50PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * Greg KH [2011-04-05 07:08:30]:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:21:33PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > * dann frazier [2011-04-04 15:57:55]:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Apr 03,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:21:33PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> * dann frazier [2011-04-04 15:57:55]:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 01:21:03PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > * dann frazier [2011-04-02 11:23:03]:
> > >
> > > > 2.6.32.36 also fails to build on powerpc/SMP:
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:15:16PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> For modules, you need to know what you are doing. Unfortunately the
> kernel developers seem to be ignorant WRT such things, "gcc" is
> hardcoded in assumption of beeing a never changing compatibility
> constant.
Perhaps you could en
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:23:02PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:59:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > > Becuase I roll my own kernel. If I upgrade the kernel with gcc-3.3
> > > (currently the Sarge default) and then upgrade to Etch (which will have
> > > gc
10 matches
Mail list logo