Re: What to do with d-i on armel?

2024-03-04 Thread Gerardo Ballabio
Gianluca Renzi wrote: > The same here. We never used the d-i but we are using Debian systems (kernel > and root file system) as daily bases of our line of products embedded > systems. Hundred of thousands of boards are using Debian since Debian Lenny > 5.0. From armel to armhf 32 bit systems. >

Bug#987013: Release goal proposal: Remove Berkeley DB

2021-04-19 Thread Gerardo Ballabio
Thanks for your explanation. Gerardo Il giorno ven 16 apr 2021 alle ore 20:09 Bastian Blank ha scritto: > > Hi Gerardo > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:30:08AM +0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote: > > Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Berkeley DB was relicensed to AGPLv3 almost eig

Bug#987013: Release goal proposal: Remove Berkeley DB

2021-04-16 Thread Gerardo Ballabio
Bastian Blank wrote: > Berkeley DB was relicensed to AGPLv3 almost eight years ago. Sorry but I don't understand, why is that a problem? I believe the AGPL (you mean the GNU Affero General Public License, right?) is a free license. Is it not? Gerardo

Bug#907199: weboob, Gratuitous sexual references

2018-09-11 Thread Gerardo Ballabio
Please forgive me if I step in to give my two cents. As others have already observed, if upstream doesn't want to collaborate, there's always the option of forking. That would be a more desirable outcome than removal from Debian -- as I understand it, the program does perform a useful function. M