Bug#683251: unblock: libisoburn/1.2.2-2

On Wednesday 01 August 2012 22:32:59 Julien Cristau wrote: Hi, > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:54:50 +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > >

Bug#683251: unblock: libisoburn/1.2.2-2

t; option. Regression introduced +by version 1.0.6 (Closes: #683248) + + -- George Danchev Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:26:57 +0200 + libisoburn (1.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru libisoburn-1.2.2/debian/patches/series libisoburn-1.2.2/debian/patches/series --- libisobur

Bug#681178: unblock: libburn/1.2.2-2

On Thursday 12 July 2012 06:38:15 Philipp Kern wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:27:23AM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > I've got three minor bugfixes from not yet released libburn 1.2.4, > > which I'd like to apply to libburn/1.2.2-1. I've not yet uploaded >

Bug#681178: unblock: libburn/1.2.2-2

ot. * Bugfix patch (Closes: #680968) 03_cdrskin-sigsegv-track-source-added-no-drive-available cdrskin could SIGSEGV if track source was added when no drive was available. -- George Danchev Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:47:15 +0200 unblock libburn/1.2.2-2 -- System Information: Debian Relea

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

On Wednesday 16 May 2012 16:44:40 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > tag 672562 pending > thanks > > Cyril Brulebois (14/05/2012): > > This looks like quite self-contained, so I might get back to you soon > > to get this transition started. Ping me back by wednesday if you > > didn't hear from me by then.

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

JFTR (as it was perfectly clear from my first mail) The versions currently found in sid of: bisonc++ flexc++ oxref stealth xd ccbuild aside, due to FTBFS with GCC 4.7 #667132 were also successfully built against the new bobcat 3.00.02-1 package in a clean current sid chroot, resp. GCC (Debian 4

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

On Monday 14 May 2012 03:10:58 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > George Danchev (13/05/2012): > > Just to add few more hopefully helpful bits. > > > > 1) the changelog of not yet uploaded package to sid, waiting for > > your green light: > Thanks, that's appreciate

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

Just to add few more hopefully helpful bits. 1) the changelog of not yet uploaded package to sid, waiting for your green light: bobcat (3.00.02-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (bumps the soname version). + Arg, ArgConfig and ConfigFile use the bridge design pattern.

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, The new bobcat library (3.00.02) bumps soname version. We have prepared a new package and tested in as well (JFTR: debcheckout and get-orig-source work as expected) T

Re: libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

On Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:04:33 PM Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >Hi! Hi, > * George Danchev [2011-06-18 14:45:43 CEST]: > > [libburnia story] > > I can't speak for the stable release team, but I guess they won't > approve the changes you have outlined here. Th

Re: libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

On Saturday, June 18, 2011 03:45:43 PM George Danchev wrote: > Dear Release and Backports teams, To correct my typos, "t-p-u" in the subject to be read as "s-p-u" (stable proposed updates). > Our libburnia packages (src:libburn/libisofs/libisoburn) in squeeze are >

libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

Dear Release and Backports teams, Our libburnia packages (src:libburn/libisofs/libisoburn) in squeeze are rapidly getting way too old as compared to these found in sid and testing. The versions currently found in squeeze do not support JTE (jigdo Template Export), lack quite some other features

Re: Bug#623378: patch for #623378

On Monday 25 April 2011 18:38:56 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 22:22 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > The patch Thomas Schmitt referred to from here: > > http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/3537/libburn/trunk > > > > is attached below in debdiff form (applies cleanly to 0

Re: Bug#623378: patch for #623378

On Wednesday 20 April 2011 05:22:35 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Hi, The patch Thomas Schmitt referred to from here: http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/3537/libburn/trunk is attached below in debdiff form (applies cleanly to 0.8.0.pl00-2), and resolves the permissions of test.iso from th

Re: Bug#594704: Freeze exception for roxterm 1.18.5-2

George Danchev writes: > Mehdi Dogguy writes: > > On 08/26/2010 10:52 PM, Tony Houghton wrote: > > > It's been working without issues for me since I finalised the current > > > version of the patch. > > > > Can you upload to unstable then? I'll

pre-approval request to upload libisoburn/0.5.6.pl00-3 to unstable

xorrisofs and xorrecord symlinks. + + -- George Danchev Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:30:02 +0300 + libisoburn (0.5.6.pl00-2) unstable; urgency=low * Do not install gifs in the doc package, since newer doxygen -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#594704: Freeze exception for roxterm 1.18.5-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Mehdi Dogguy writes: > On 08/26/2010 10:52 PM, Tony Houghton wrote: > > It's been working without issues for me since I finalised the current > > version of the patch. > > Can you

Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

Adam D. Barratt writes: > On Fri, August 27, 2010 10:28, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > В 10:03 +0100 на 27.08.2010 (пт), Adam D. Barratt написа: > >> On Fri, August 27, 2010 09:26, Yavor Doganov wrote: > >> > Sure, does this mean that with this change the update is approved and > >> > can be

Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

Russ Allbery writes: > Julien Cristau writes: > > Shipping such a file in the package means it'll get emptied every time > > the package in re-installed or upgraded. That sounds wrong. > > This is weird, but the aspell packages have been doing this for quite some > time, long enough that there's

Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

Yavor Doganov writes: > Георги Данчев wrote: > > I agree, that 'automatically removed by dpkg' games are best to be > > avoided for regenerated files, and it is saner to remove them in the > > postrm, since now debsums aspell-bg lists these three regenerated > > files as FAILED, which is to be expe

Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

Yavor Doganov writes: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > > These files are supposed to be regenerated in postinst by > > > update-dictcommon-aspell; that's a feature. > > > > Then why is it shipped

Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

Julien Cristau writes: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > > > +# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is > >

Re: Freeze exception for roxterm 1.18.5-2

Quoting "Tony Houghton" : On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:06:43 +0100 Tony Houghton wrote: Shortly after the freeze a bug was found in roxterm 1.18.5 and I would like to have it fixed in squeeze by allowing the inclusion of 1.18.5-2. The Debian bug is 592984

allow libisoburn/0.5.6.pl00-2 in testing

Hi Release Team, Please allow libisoburn/0.5.6.pl00-2 (which was finally built on hppa this night) to enter testing. It fixes FTBFS #590396 -- newer doxygen does not generate tab*.gif anymore, thus *.gif are not tried to be installed as in 0.5.6.pl00-1. By the way, doxygen is a timebomb on cert

Re: pre-approval for glibc/2.3.6.ds1-13etch9 (stable)

On Sunday 04 January 2009 10:52:38 Riku Voipio wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:30:51AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > > Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > I am planning to do an upload of glibc/stable to switch Slovenia and > > > Slovakia to Euro. Slovakia has joined the Eurozone a few days ago, and

request removal of shc package from lenny

Hello Release Team, Hereby I request removal of the shc package from lenny. The package is well maintained, but it always has an inherit problem in its main function to encrypt shell scripts as decribed in #327263 (generally it passes the scripts back to sh -c which could be easily stolen from

Re: freeze exception for yodl_2.13.1-1 (fixes RC bug) please allow into lenny

On Monday 29 September 2008 14:04:00 Neil McGovern wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:53:00PM -0700, Tony Mancill wrote: > > It includes the build-dep on the updated yodl package and builds inside > > a pbuilder, so I think they're ready to enter lenny together. > > Hrm, it seems that there's a ra

Re: freeze exception for yodl_2.13.1-1 (fixes RC bug) please allow into lenny

On Friday 26 September 2008 15:31:01 Neil McGovern wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:40:43PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > please allow yodl_2.13.1-1 into Lenny. It fixes the RC bug #499421. > > Fine, however: > This will need to go in with ecasound, please re-ping when both

freeze exception for yodl_2.13.1-1 (fixes RC bug) please allow into lenny

Dear release team, please allow yodl_2.13.1-1 into Lenny. It fixes the RC bug #499421. the debian changelog reads: yodl (2.13.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (Closes: #499421). the upstream changelog reads: yodl (2.13.1) * yodl2whatever no longer supports the --unique-ou

Please allow c++-annotations (6.5.0-1) to propagate to etch

Dear Release Team, Please allow c++-annotations in sid (6.5.0-1) to propagate to etch (6.4.1-1). This package is mere documentation and has some nice streamlining wrt c++ style recommendations as well as Portuguese translation has been added in this new upstream release. There are no a

Please update bisonc++ in testing to version 1.5.0-1

Hello Debian Release, Please allow the new version of bisonc++ 1.5.0-1 to propagate into testing.  It fixes a known problem with some grammars (#395291) which is now resolved. This bug is normal (more like a heads-up one) and the old version is still usable, but the solution provided to t

Re: draft guidelines for official CD images

On Saturday 14 October 2006 13:32, Andreas Barth wrote: --cut-- > > Oh, and > > another point: so live-cds are not official CDs, according to this > > definition ("All software that ends up on the installed system..."). I > > think it would be nice to have official live-cds. > > These guidelines we

Re: Debian Naming Suggestion

On Friday 08 September 2006 20:14, Jeremy Herndon wrote: > I currently do not subscribe to the mailing lists. So I don't know if > this has been considered. Hi, Ok, CC:ed, but probaby -project is a far better place to discuss sich considerations. > I want to offer a suggestion for a new

Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:30, Marco d'Itri wrote: > In linux.debian.kernel Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be > >> true or at least do not consider it a problem, and this is enough for > >> me to ignore the opinion of

Re: Problems with ntp

On Wednesday 14 September 2005 10:03, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:07:30AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems. > > > > The arlib subdir isn't distributable. > > Neither is the entire libparse subdir, or anyt