Re: BTS lost most of its version tracking data!

2016-12-31 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:44:21 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 04:29:47PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > They now risk being auto-removed from testing. If they are indeed > > auto-removed, they won't re-enter stretch and they won't be part of

Re: BTS lost most of its version tracking data!

2016-12-31 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:46:48 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 03:37:47PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > It seems a bit unfair that some packages won't be part of stretch, due > > to a BTS glitch which happened during the last days before the soft &

Re: BTS lost most of its version tracking data!

2016-12-31 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:57:06 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 04:47:30PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > In the meanwhile, I see that something changed on the BTS side. > > But something still appears to be wrong. The RC bug count page [1] > > cla

Re: BTS lost most of its version tracking data!

2016-12-30 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:40:39 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 29/12/16 16:34, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > As of now, the RC bug count page [1] claims > > > > Number concerning the current stable release: 24 > > Number concerning the next release: 25

BTS lost most of its version tracking data!

2016-12-29 Thread Francesco Poli
atory! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpPipBvWHooS.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: bugscan doesn't obey Extra-Source-Only: yes (and debbugs probably doesn't either)

2016-08-01 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:25:22 -0500 Don Armstrong wrote: [...] > On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Would you like to have an actual bug report filed against debbugs, in > > order to track the issue more easily? > > Sure, done with this email. Good, t

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-30 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:03:36 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:41:08 -0500 Don Armstrong wrote: [...] > > OK, this is going to take a bit of work; I think the short-term answer > > is for the BTS to completely ignore source entries which are > > E

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-25 Thread Francesco Poli
for your willingness to fix the issue soon. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgp6i0U9WzmtV.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Francesco Poli
p! Please keep us informed, as the investigations go on. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgphhxY

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 16:24:19 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On 2016-07-24 16:00, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Should be contacted, perhaps? > > Sure, if you'd like to. Dear BTS owner, could you please investigate on what happened to bug #830267 on 2016-07-19T10:00 ?

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:51:45 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On 2016-07-24 11:20, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Dear Release Team, could you please explain what I failed to understand > > about the testing migration rules [2]? > > Your understanding is correct - an RC

Re: Bug#830267: dpkg: Segmentation fault when purging package in APT test case

2016-07-24 Thread Francesco Poli
785311 [2] https://www.debian.org/devel/testing -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgp7HXipql5_4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: License incompatibility below RC threshold

2016-06-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:42:51 + Niels Thykier wrote: ^^^ > Francesco Poli: [...] > > Could someone prod the FTP masters to analyze the issue and provide an > > authoritative statement? > > > > Thanks for your time. > > > > > >

Re: License incompatibility below RC threshold

2016-04-23 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:34:44 + Niels Thykier wrote: > Francesco Poli: > > On Sat, 2 May 2015 18:34:31 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > > > >> [...] > > > > > > Dear Release Team, dear FTP masters, > > once again this issue has been left un

Re: License incompatibility below RC threshold

2016-04-23 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 2 May 2015 18:34:31 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:49:55 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: > > > Hi FTP masters, > > > > We have been prodded about the severity of #741196 > [ the prod is https://bugs.debian.org/741196#101 ] > > Howeve

Bug#816708: release.debian.org: migration waits 5 days despite urgency=high

2016-03-04 Thread Francesco Poli
be fixed soon... > > I've added a hint so the package should be eligible to migrate in the > next run. Thanks! Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..... Francesco Poli .

Bug#816708: release.debian.org: migration waits 5 days despite urgency=high

2016-03-04 Thread Francesco Poli (wintermute)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hello Release Team! I noticed something awkward about the unstable→testing migration and it seems to me that it's not even the first time I see it... It appears that the migration waits 5

Re: License incompatibility below RC threshold

2015-05-02 Thread Francesco Poli
back from you. Thanks for your time. Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ fsck is a four letter word... . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgp9CjCYU969O.pgp Description: PGP signature

License incompatibility below RC threshold

2015-01-07 Thread Francesco Poli
threshold (during the wait for an official statement that seems to never arrive). Looking forward to hear back from you. Thanks for your time. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ fsck is a four letter word... . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr

Bug#729747: pu: package apt-listbugs/0.1.8

2013-12-06 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:56:05 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:18:55 + Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > [...] > > On 2013-12-04 21:24, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:04:41 + Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: [...] > > FTR, uploa

Bug#729747: pu: package apt-listbugs/0.1.8

2013-12-06 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:18:55 + Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: [...] > On 2013-12-04 21:24, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:04:41 + Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > > [...] > >> On 2013-11-16 16:43, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: > > [..

Bug#729747: pu: package apt-listbugs/0.1.8

2013-12-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:04:41 + Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: [...] > On 2013-11-16 16:43, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: [...] > > If you agree, I can ask my usual sponsor to upload the prepared > > package to stable, so that it will end up in the next point release. >

Bug#729747: pu: package apt-listbugs/0.1.8

2013-11-16 Thread Francesco Poli (wintermute)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, I am the current maintainer of the apt-listbugs package. While preparing version 0.1.10, I fixed an insecure temporary file creation. The apt-listbugs program creates a temporary file in

Re: Bug#710140: gpgme1.0 dropped libgpgme-pth

2013-11-03 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 11:41:55 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > I waited some time before speaking again, as I was hoping to see some > comments from other people, possibly members of the release team. > > Anyway, do I understand correctly that this issue has currently a > practi

Re: Bug#710140: gpgme1.0 dropped libgpgme-pth

2013-10-05 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:06:14 +0200 Daniel Leidert wrote: [...] > Am Sonntag, den 25.08.2013, 12:19 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli: [...] > > Could you please clarify the status of the bug? > > Thanks for your time! > > CCing release.d.o. > [...] > I'm hereby asking

Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9

2012-11-12 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:51:20 + Neil McGovern wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 06:31:00PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > I hope the freeze exception may be granted, even if the upload happened > > with a couple days of delay with respect to the freeze policy change... > &g

Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9

2012-11-12 Thread Francesco Poli
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 00:34:02 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > To be frank, the proposed update was actually supposed to meet the > previous guidelines for freeze exceptions: "translation updates and > documentation fixes". [...] > the u

Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9

2012-11-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 00:09:52 +0100 intrigeri wrote: [...] > Hi, Hi! Thanks for your very fast reply. > > Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) : > > unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9 > > The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is &

Bug#692928: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.9

2012-11-10 Thread Francesco Poli (wintermute)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package apt-listbugs As can be seen with the following command on the public git repository: $ git diff apt-listbugs/0.1.8..apt-listbugs/0.1.9 | filterdiff \ --exc

Bug#690461: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7

2012-10-21 Thread Francesco Poli
don't know whether this is enough to grant a wheezy-ignore tag to bug #617613... Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! . Francesco Poli . Gnu

Bug#689204: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.8

2012-10-01 Thread Francesco Poli
ent! ..... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE pgpfuktqOvFTT.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#689204: unblock: apt-listbugs/0.1.8

2012-09-30 Thread Francesco Poli (wintermute)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package apt-listbugs As can be seen with the following command on the git repository: $ git diff apt-listbugs/0.1.7..apt-listbugs/0.1.8 | filterdiff \ --exclude='*

Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ?

2006-10-18 Thread Francesco Poli
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_ . Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgpsSEcTTVMRF.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Problems with ntp

2005-09-14 Thread Francesco Poli
ony a possible replacement? It conflicts with ntp, among other things... -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fing

Re: DRAFT: d-d-a mail about removing non-free documentation

2005-09-13 Thread Francesco Poli
but the lack of "copyleft" might be disliked by the author: if this | is the case, you could recommend the GNU GPL v2. The rest of the announcement seems good. -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ..