Re: Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-24 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Frank Küster wrote: Faheem Mitha wrote: I think that getting the fix into a point release ie. 6.1 as a backport to 11.85 would be reasonable. I agree - delaying squeeze because of that would be ridiculous. Right. So, what's the next step? Wait for the a

Re: Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-23 Thread Faheem Mitha
Hi Frank, Thanks for your kind message. On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Frank Küster wrote: severity 610714 serious thanks Faheem Mitha wrote: On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Hilmar Preuße wrote: On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote: I'd like to get a fix uploaded for #610714 for auct

Re: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-23 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Hilmar Preuße wrote: On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote: Hi, I'd like to get a fix uploaded for #610714 for auctex in squeeze. This should be straightforward. The fix breaks preview with the version of ghostscript in squeeze (8.71~dfsg2-6.1), an