:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?absolute=0;collapse=1;format=png;found=uglifyjs%2F2.8.29-8;height=;info=1;package=node-uglify;width=;ignore_boring=0
I don't know why UDD isn't showing it, but it's also not in the bugscan
RC list which is a bug. I'll try to look at it l
y for a fact.]
I'll take a look at the cron output for it shortly to see if I have any
better ideas. [And clean up the few cases I see where we're not
propogating failures or have non-atomic file creation.]
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
One day I pu
On Mon, 01 Jan 2018, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > udeb uninstallability watcher (2018-01-01):
> > > Newly-broken packages in testing
> > > multipath-udeb amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386
> > >
t
the right versions are in unstable, but they're not showing up on the
graph.
I'll try to track this down today and see what is going on there.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
The terrorist's job is to terrorize the people, to interfere with
fre
.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+perltidy (20140328-2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Backport fix for CVE-2016-10374 which fixes insecure file deletion of
+perltidy.ERR and perltidy.LOG files (closes: #862667)
+
+ -- Don Armstrong Sun, 21 May 2017 12:41:30 -0700
+
perltidy (20140328-1) unsta
removed all blocking bugs on
> #827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on
> two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].
Hrm; that's not supposed to happen.
Let me check that out and see if I can fix it.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
Information wants to be free to kill again.
-- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: important
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:03:36 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:41:08 -0500 Don Armstrong wrote:
> [...]
> > > OK, this is going to take a bit of work; I thi
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [dropped #830267 from CC; it's not directly relevant to this branch of the
> discussion]
>
> On 2016-07-24 17:43, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> >>could you please
don't know when the BTS thought that 1.18.9 was
actually in testing and not in unstable. I'll try to check out snapshots
later this week to see if I can figure out when the transition actually
happened, or if there was something else going on in the archive to
explain it.
--
Don Armstrong
st do not have the time to support a development release of lilypond
through the lifetime of a stable release.]
Are auto-removals from testing currently off? [Basically, I'd like to
avoid having lilypond removed from testing until we're closer to the
release if that's at all possib
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:38:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > If there's something specific that you'd like the CTTE to try to do
> > > beyond what I've just
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> If there's something specific that you'd like the CTTE to try to do
> beyond what I've just reported now, let me know.
Let me know if you'd like the CTTE to do something beyond what I've
already done.
--
Don Arms
to move forward? Would a list
of the specific bug fixes and additional features be enough for an
initial yes/no, given the review process upstream?
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
There is no more concentrated form of evil
than apathy.
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I've been waiting for the release team for a while to make a decision
> > on #765639 for a year now. Could you help in getting a decision?
> >
> > I've actually been
ecision on this?
Specifically, this being (FWICT), bringing a new(er) version of openssl
into jessie and/or wheezy.
I personally don't have enough information to form an opinion yet, but
I recognize that some decision should be made.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.
:17:08.0 -0800
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: misc
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debbugs developers
-Uploaders: Josip Rodin , Colin Watson
+Uploaders: Don Armstrong
Standards-Version: 3.2.1
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper
diff -Nru debbugs-2.4.1/debian/debbugsconfig
debbugs-2.4.1.1
:
> Can the CTTE overrule delegates?
Only if the decision of the delegate falls under 6.1.1, 6.1.2, or 6.1.4
(and of course, that it was a decision delegated to the delegate by the
DPL). If it's not a technical matter, than only a GR can override a
delegate.
--
Don Armstrong
ECLINED() :
Apache::Constants::DECLINED();
}
# Lookup the file in the cache and scale the image if the cached
# image does not exist
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
I will not make any deals with you. I've resigned. I will not be
pushed,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 d-i
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:56:23AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > This is a simple partial fix for the RC bug #768598, with a typoed bug
> > in the changelog for good measure:
> >
> > d
self-triggering; will still need
+Breaks from dpkg to resolve this (closes: #768599)
+ * Add Pre-Depends on dpkg to allow for noawait just in case this gets
+backported to squeeze.
+
+ -- Don Armstrong Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:26:37 -0800
+
fontconfig (2.11.0-6.1) unstable; urgency=low
/share/doc/lilypond/Documentation. (Closes: #768272)
+ * Add missing Pre-Depends: ${misc:Depends} for dpkg-maintscript-helper.
+
+ -- Don Armstrong Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:38:32 -0800
+
lilypond (2.18.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Revert previous patch (no parallel); the issue was actually
amespace would work.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
First you take a drink,
then the drink takes a drink,
then the drink takes you.
-- F. Scott Fitzgerald
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
nd don't, though. It would be ideal if the only reverse
dependency of guile 1.8 in jessie was lilypond.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
"You have many years to live--do things you will be proud to remember
when you are old."
-- Shinka proverb. (Jo
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Yeah, it's not working. I've got it on my TODO list, but haven't had a
> chance to work on it yet. I will probably have a chance next weekend
> to spend some time on it.
So I think I've fixed this now; had to finally s
Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I've now rolled this out, but bugscan's crontab hasn't run yet. I'll
> > keep an eye on it to make sure it works.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ do
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using
> bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I
> just fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS yet.
I've now rolled this
> The BTS lists e.g. #710310, which is wheezy-ignore. So it seems that the
> BTS ignores wheezy-ignore.
Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using bugcfg
instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I just
fixed this in @81492, but I h
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
> > them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
> > package FTBFS on 4 architectures,
hich solution
porters would prefer.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
"For those who understand, no explanation is necessary.
For those who do not, none is possible."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
>
> > Assuming that the patch for #699742[0] fixes this issue with DI RC
> > releases being installed, is there still an outstanding issue for the
> > CTTE?
>
> Earlier in this thread, there had bee
g d-i built with a version
of syslinux that isn't being distributed in wheezy, but I think that
might need to be discussed and a technical solution fleshed out
elsewhere, and probably isn't ripe for a CTTE decision.]
Don Armstrong
0: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699742#3
. Same
> issue, as seen by Michael and myself.
Is it the intention of the Release Managers not to accept a newer
version of syslinux into wheezy? [That is, if the CTTE were to decide
to require some "fix" to d-i, we'd also have to override the RMs?]
Don Armstrong
--
I now know h
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 19:43:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > >
> > > On 23.12.2012 21:31, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > &
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 19:43:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On 23.12.2012 21:31, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > >In making a fix to the RC bug #684817, I also fixed a problem in
&g
happened with any other packages;
> could RC bugs for Wheezy have gone missing for similar reasons?
No, because they still show up in
http://bugs.debian.org/bugscan/britney/testing-nr and
http://bugs.debian.org/bugscan/other/testing.html for example.
Don Armstrong
--
Sometimes I wish I could ta
st.]
Diff attached for proposed upload to unstable.
Don Armstrong
--
My spelling ability, or rather the lack thereof, is one of the wonders
of the modern world.
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
diff -u lilypond-2.14.2/debian/control lilypond-2.14.2/debian/control
--
: #658139. This also fixes
#619564, #627027, and #551734 which were related to evince.mime and
evince-gtk.mime. #581441 was fixed in shared-mime-info/1.0.
unblock evince/3.4.0-3.1
Thanks.
Don Armstrong
--
There is no such thing as "social gambling." Either you are there to
cut
x27;transcript', 'GLOB(0x1c9bf50)',
> 'requester', 'Tobias Frost ', 'request_addr',
> 'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid',
> '<1333548859.3223.24.ca...@mordor.loewenhoehle.ip>', 'request_subject', ...)
>
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Awesomeness of Squeeze
Obviously, because it's a Debian release, it's awesome! Or at the very
least, awe-inspiring. What more is needed?
Good job everyone, and keep it up!
Don Armstrong
--
Herodotus says, "Very few things happen
severity.
>
> @Don: Do we need this band-aid fix in squeeze?
It's simple enough; the only change in -2 is to remove the Provides:
nscd, and add some verbiage as to what to do if you actually need it.
I don't have a strong opinion either way, but given that two people
have no
the issue RC.
Furthermore, it's not necessary to e-mail anyone else but the package
maintainer, the bug, and possibly debian-release if the package
maintainer doesn't respond.
Don Armstrong
--
Our days are precious, but we gladly see them going
If in their place we find a thing mo
ve enough
machines with LDAP to have run into the same problems with nscd, which
is why I packaged it.]
But anyway, thanks to Mehdi Dogguy it's been unblocked, so it'll
transition soon. I'll whip up a backport once that happens.
Don Armstrong
--
LEADERSHIP -- A form of self-p
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Moreover, it doesn't seem to fix any RC bug.
>
> unscd was made to resolve the problems seen in nscd where nscd is
> near useless in a system with any amount of load (see #574990 e
e issue. We don't really need to rush to decide
this yet.
Don Armstrong
--
[A] theory is falsifiable [(and therefore scientific) only] if the
class of its potential falsifiers is not empty.
-- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ ยง21
http://www.donarmstrong.com
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 15:52:21 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The fix is to unblock lilypond. The only reason it didn't make it
> > in for the freeze were the failures of fontforge brought about by
> > a new version.
>
s fault, it looks like fontforge dying). Do you have any plans for
> how to fix these RC bugs for squeeze? Are the fixes feasible to backport, for
> instance?
The fix is to unblock lilypond. The only reason it didn't make it in
for the freeze were the failures of fontforge brought a
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 19/11/2010 03:26, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >I've been using it in production for months, and it's been in unstable
> >for a while already; if worst comes to worst and there is a serious
> >problem with it in testing, it can
ckage, and works
significantly better than nscd does.
unscd (0.47-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial packaging for Debian (Closes: #513305)
-- Don Armstrong Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:21:13 -0700
Description: Micro Name Service Caching Daemon
A daemon which handles passwd, group and host lookup
mation first.
The other issue is that you all would only see mails from bugs which
happened to fit that criteria at the instant that the message to the
bug was sent; you'd still need to examine the bug listings for the
packages anyway.
Don Armstrong
--
Mozart tells us what it's like t
t as to
whether it is releasable or not, that technical decision can of course
be refered back to the ctte.]
Don Armstrong
--
Information wants to be free to kill again.
-- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://
resultant archive bloat?x
Don Armstrong
0: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/10/msg00226.html (cc'ed
to -release, but further discussion should not happen there because
release isn't a discussion list.)
1:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/perl-maintainers/2009-Octo
ch the experimental upload is based on. If you're uploading
an unstable version, the experimental uploads should not show up in
the changelog unless the unstable version is based upon a version
which is in experimental.
Don Armstrong
--
Information wants to be free to kill a
This sounds like a good idea, but there would still need to be logic
to detect which mirrors had actually managed to get up to date... and
that bit is probably a bit complicated.
Don Armstrong
--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is
nyway. If there's something more that needs to be
changed, let me (or someone else know.)
James: the links will be fixed by the next time the pages are
generated; thanks for reporting the problem.
Don Armstrong
--
Our days are precious, but we gladly see them going
If in their place we fin
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:23:07PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > See the attached patch which fixes #510665 (a normal bug) and along
> > the way #496003 (documentation); I'd like to get these into lenny, but
> > before
(hopefully) double checking that they fix his problem.]
The interdiff is attached.
Don Armstrong
--
Your village called.
They want their idiot back.
-- xkcd http://xkcd.com/c23.html
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
diff -u spamass-milter-0.3.1/spamass-milter.cpp spam
checking it
out with Joerg now.
Don Armstrong
--
A Democracy lead by politicians and political parties, fails.
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > am Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:24:02AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > > Looks like debbugs (or britney?) is broken, bug#211765 doesn't get
> > > properly ignored. Can
table's
> BugsV. I don't know if there are users of this files besides
> britney...
>
> Could it be a problem that this very bug is not properly versionned?
That shouldn't be a problem.
Don Armstrong
--
CNN/Reuters: News reports have filtered out early this morning tha
g?
Not automatically, but it's not like doing this manually in a single
shot is hard.
Don Armstrong
--
Only one creature could have duplicated the expressions on their
faces, and that would be a pigeon who has heard not only that Lord
Nelson has got down off his column but has also been
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
>> *** proposal ***
>>
>> For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag
>> limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection
>> of the distributions and
iness state above
instead, defaulting to (testing distribution), sid.
*** end proposal ***
Does that meet the needs of the RMs et al? Are there any objections?
Don Armstrong
1: It's quite likely that we talked about the way it should work, and
I totally forgot about what we decided that it sho
The original bug which caused all of these blocking bugs has been
fixed; rebuilds probably need to be requested for all of these
packages.
Don Armstrong
--
This can't be happening to me. I've got tenure.
-- James Hynes _Publish and Perish_
http://www.donarmstrong.com
I've fixed #494235 [libthreads-shared-perl] with a new upstream
version (just bug fixes)
and
#492673 [bitlbee] with a NMU to just fix the bug. I don't know if I
should ask back later after 10 days, or if you want to shove in the
hint now.
Don Armstrong
--
Quite the contrary;
at should be abundantly apparent to anyone who has been paying
attention. Regardless, it doesn't dismiss the crux of the argument:
baring competent legal advice to the contrary,[1] distributing
sourceless GPLed works is not clear of legal liability. Doing
otherwise may put ourselves and our mirr
ted
13:24:21 also, I expect aptitude to deal more gracefully with
a missing gnupg than with a missing archive keyring.
the latter might just mean you trust _other_
repositories instead. the former means you have no
way of checking
n add the free logo back in the
diff.gz.
If upstream changes its mind and decides to freely license the logo,
the maintainers can stop repackaging upstream source.
Don Armstrong
--
"Because," Fee-5 explained patiently, "I was born in the fifth row.
Any fool would understand tha
67 matches
Mail list logo
