Hi,
ttf-dejavu 2.29-3 is now in good shape,
please allow it into testing
TIA,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
please allow current ttf-dejavu (2.29-2) into testing.
It contains a couple of udebs.
Thank you in advance,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I've forwarded lunar's message to the directfb ML (directfb-...@directfb.org)
and got the following reply:
-
From: Niels Roest
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:47:00 +0100
To: Davide Viti
Subject: Re: [directfb-dev] [lu...@debian.org: Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to
sid]
Hi Davide,
Hi,
please let ttf-dejavu 2.25-3 migrate to testing.
This version introduces the new ttf-dejavu-mono-udeb udeb needed for having
a shell in the graphical installer.
Thanx in advance,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Frans,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:36:14AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Davide Viti wrote:
> > this version fixes #471024 which affects the graphical installer:
> > please unblock it.
>
> There is absolutely no need for special treatment of this version because of
> the
Hi,
this version fixes #471024 which affects the graphical installer:
please unblock it.
TIA,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
it would be great if you could unblock ttf-dejavu 2.23-1 which
fixes an important issue [1].
Thanx alot in advance,
Davide
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200712191257.59357.benlaenen%40gmail.com&forum_name=dejavu-fonts
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Hi,
could you please hint current version of ttf-dejavu (2.21-1) into testing?
the package provides also an udeb used by the graphical installer.
TIA,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
could you please hint current version of ttf-dejavu (2.19-1) into testing?
the package provides also an udeb used by the graphical installer.
TIA,
Davide
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Mark,
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 28/02/2007 8.52
>A: "Davide Viti"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: "Debian Release"
>Ogg: Re: Please consider ttf-dejavu 2.15-1 for Etch
>
>Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writ
Hi folks,
please consider ttf-dejavu 2.15-1 for Etch, which includes the fixes
described in [1] and the improvements described in [2] ("Changes from
2.14 to 2.15")
Thanx in advance for your help,
Davide
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2007/02/msg01116.html
[2] http://dejavu.sourceforge.ne
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 11:37:23AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> The problem with accents seems to be a more general regression. Compare
> also for example the accented y and N characters for be. These look fuzzy
> in 14 when compared to 13. (For the y the accent is centered better
> though.)
> Same
Hi All,
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 11:37:23AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 03 February 2007 09:28, Frans Pop wrote:
> > So, no, I don't think dejavu should be hinted yet. I'd like to see a
> > bit more activity from the font people to check how things look _in_
> > the graphical installer fi
Hi,
please consider updating ttf-dejavu to 2.14-1 it is mainly intended to
fix #408311 which causes text rendered using the sans-oblique variant
to look bad. IMHO it would be quite bad to have such problems in Etch
with a font used by so many people; note that the problem affects also
the graphical
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 09:43:38PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Davide Viti wrote:
> ...
> > version 2.13-1: current upstream version recently uploaded in unstable
> > and containing many fixes
>
> Will be unblocked during next round of d-i updates...
excellent!
and no
Hi,
It'd be great if you could update ttf-dejavu (currently 2.11-1); it's
the main font used by the graphical-installer and the latest releases
contains a lot of fixes an improvements (see [1])
There are two options:
version 2.12-2: it fixes #401615 (which was blocked by #401924)
version 2.13-1:
16 matches
Mail list logo
