Re: Using debbugs to formalize and track etch goals

2005-03-22 Thread David Schmitt
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 12:41, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:11:28PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > My suggestion is to initially submitting the "major > > package changes" as bugs to the (future) etch pseudo-package, allowing > > others to suggest expected features/changes in

Re: lush not getting into testing

2005-03-12 Thread David Schmitt
On Saturday 12 March 2005 15:00, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It's not something to delay the release over, so it's not relevant on > > -release atm, especially since -release can't do anything about it. > > -release is *not* a discussion list.

Re: lush not getting into testing

2005-03-12 Thread David Schmitt
On Saturday 12 March 2005 05:02, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Please see bug 267494. Lush (a QA package) should get into testing. > It needs to get into testing. What is necessary, beyond a 201 day old > bug report, to have it in testing? http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=lush | lu