Bug#1033591: bullseye-pu: package opendmarc/1.4.2-1+deb11u1

Dear maintainers, I have decided that I won’t be spending time on this bug in the future. Please close if it is appropriate to do so. Thank you, -- David

Bug#998436: bullseye-pu: package opendmarc/1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-6+deb11u1

Adam D. Barratt: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 10:01 +0100, David Bürgin wrote: >> Since releasing the opendmarc version in Debian bullseye, two >> important >> issues affecting it have been reported upstream. >> >> [ Impact ] >

Bug#998436: bullseye-pu: package opendmarc/1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-6+deb11u1

"ticket193.patch" (Closes: #995694): +- Remove unexplained diff that breaks opendmarc-import + * Add patch "arcseal-segfaults.patch" (Closes: #995703): +- Fix segfaults, increase token max lengths in ARC-Seal headers + + -- David Bürgin Wed, 03 Nov 2021 16:56:39 +0100 + op

Bug#990027: pre-approval unblock: opendmarc/1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-6

: #990001) + + -- David Bürgin Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:37:57 +0200 + opendmarc (1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=high * Amend cve-2020-12272.patch to keep libopendmarc2 public ABI unchanged diff -Nru opendmarc-1.4.0~beta1+dfsg/debian/patches/cve-2021-34555.patch opendmarc-1.4.0~beta1+dfsg

Bug#989324: Bug#989243: RFS: opendmarc/1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4 -- Milter implementation of DMARC

Adam Borowski: On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 11:45:23AM +0200, David Bürgin wrote: The release team have asked for a change https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989324 Can I upload a new package with version 1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4 to mentors, or do I have to use version 1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-5

Bug#989324: unblock: opendmarc/1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4

: #977766, #977767): +- CVE-2019-16378: Fix handling of multi-valued From headers +- CVE-2019-20790: Validate incoming SPF headers +- CVE-2020-12272: Check DKIM and SPF domain syntax + + -- David Bürgin Sat, 29 May 2021 16:22:50 +0200 + opendmarc (1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=high