en the bug
doesn't show up. Installing dpkg updates libc6 to etch but not
amd64-libs.
I don't know how to prevent others from hitting this. Would
predepending on a sufficiently new dpkg work?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 03:22:51PM -0800, Jeff Carr wrote:
> What is
> best for the free software movement going forward in your opinion?
Discussing this, if you must discuss it at all, on a discussion list.
That means -project or -kernel, but not -release, please.
--
Daniel Jaco
+1,11 @@
+dejagnu (1.4.4.cvs20060709-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Acknowledge previous NMUs.
+ * Fix permissions on /usr/share/dejagnu when building without fakeroot
+(Closes: #392589, #379809).
+
+ -- Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:06:59 -0500
+
dejagnu
I've verified that rebuilding debootstrap on MIPS fixes #397091, which
presumably is blocking successful d-i on MIPS. Would a bin-NMU be
appropriate for this?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
ply to libX11. Or can we do the compile for lib64, use
> lib trick there as it is not frozen?
I don't think it matters, but it's up to the X maintainers.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 02:50:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> But running Debian binaries on other distributions remains a
>
ectly happy to do this. After etch.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ten things unblocked.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;s not in the bug
tracking system upstream. That's not the same thing. Who do you think
would fix it? Hint, probably me or Thiemo. No one else has been
interested in working on this stuff in the past.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ne.
You don't get the picture. In fact the above is completely wrong. I
recall explaining this to you yesterday.
It's a lot of work to fix and no one has done it. That's not the same
thing at all.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
h in some previous
versions of the Debian binutils package which worked around the
problem, but I'm pretty sure it's gone now, and it was definitely
bogus.
The problem is well known upstream and no one's had the bullheaded
stubborness to tackle it in several years; it'll be a pai
y is set
before I have to change the package...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
build on mipsel; security fix, can be
> synced after release.
If you're syncing security fixes missing on only one architecture,
should gdb 6.3-6 go in also?
Not a big deal if it doesn't. It's not important as security fixes go.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To U
Glibc -22 has finally been built and uploaded for all architectures
(special thanks to Ryan for kicking it along). Every change in the
package should be suitable for sarge; it fixes one bug, which is not
tagged as RC, but various RMs have agreed is important to fix.
* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EM
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:04:02AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Content-Description: message body text
> > > I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for tes
nt some other PR number? 14884 is a fixincludes thing.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> At the bottom of this message is a diff against glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 which
> fixes merged bugs 207872, 210840, 274852, and 276384. I spoke with Colin on
> IRC and he seemed amenable to this as a last-minute fix for sar
: Dpatch author: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+# DP: Patch author: Daniel Jacobowitz, Roland McGrath, Jakub Jelinek
+# DP: Upstream status: In CVS
+# DP: Status Details: Backported
+# DP: Date: 2005-05-08
+
+PATCHLEVEL=1
+
+if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
+echo >&2 "`basename $0`:
Fix printing of fork status messages, and disable them by default
(Closes: #254039).
-- Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 8 Dec 2004 18:35:02 -0500
gdb (6.3-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Backport a patch for a warning about the vsyscall DSO.
* Backport a spelling fix for
ic.
>
> So what are the tests useful for, then? They're obviously useless as a
> gauge of quality, because failing tests apparently don't indicate a flaw in
> the software.
A little common sense, please? The test results have to be interpreted
by a human being. There are about twenty thousand tests and most
architectures fail maybe a few dozen.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
one objects I will finish the GCC work and ask
Matthias to commit it to the gcc-3.4 repository. I understand that it's
very late to be doing this, but I think the changes to gcc-3.4 are safe
and better than attempting to generate another compiler package.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:49:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:01PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:10:33AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > > Package: ncurses
> > > Version: 5.3.20030719-5
> > >
week. I don't think bumping up to a
new release is wise.
Of course, I might be wrong, or the release folks might disagree with
me - can I get a second opinion here?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
buildds from trying to build it. Am I mistaken?
Are you saying that the build daemon would ignore a versioned build
dependency on said packages? If so, yes, you're mistaken.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:17:16PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 06:12:42PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > As of a few minutes ago, there's nothing left in the TODO file that I
> > consider a showstopper (except for the final check of files/con
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 06:12:42PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As of a few minutes ago, there's nothing left in the TODO file that I
> consider a showstopper (except for the final check of files/control
> scripts/etc on non-i386 architectures, after everything is built).
>
robably straight into unstable.
All comments welcome.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
pretty soon;
> this is the correct way to fix the showstopper busybox brokenness on
> ia64 and alpha, so if we're not going to get the correct fix in, we'll
> have to agree on a kludge.
It's in experimental, but still in flux. I think it will make the cut
oval of the 2.2.20 sources from unstable doesn't seem to have caused
> > a stir, so this package can probably also go without being missed.
>
> Sounds okay; you might want to ask the PowerPC first, though. CCing
> drow.
Not a problem. No one should use that beast any more.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
ed.
>
> Due to that, I'm building boot-floppies 3.0.13 now. Below is the
> changelogs.
>
> Quick turn-around, but how can that hurt, eh?
Mmkay. Please don't build PowerPC until after dinstall tomorrow, I've
uploaded fixed kernels, pcmcia and all.
--
Daniel Jacobow
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:19:43AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It's not in unstable or testing. Eek. How'd that happen??
>
> I would guess pcmcic-cs was forced from unstable into testing, causing
> the
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:11:02AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin 230508 Apr 13 14:42
> > pcmcia-cs_3.1.22-0.2potato_powerpc.deb
> > -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin 41
pies.
I would really rather someone fix this, even at the cost of delaying
boot floppies further. 2.2.19pre17 is a significant security upgrade.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team
"I am croutons!"
ndle this?
Bump the version by .0.1, for a binary-only NMU.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team
"I am croutons!"
out
> 2.2r3 w/o waiting for the kernels.
>
> Anyone working on this, then? BenC ? Anthony?
What's our time frame here? I need to verify that 2.2.18 fixes the
current PowerPC installation brown bag.
Dan
/--------\ /\
|
e get this one instead?
Dan
/\ /--------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
\/ \/
Just a heads-up: we will need to use the CVS debian-cd for 2.2r2, not the
version in potato. Should someone upload this eventually?
Dan
/\ /\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU
> oversight? Or are the bugs still extant? Is anyone working on fixing
> PowerPC boot-floppies bugs?
I did fix a few of them. The majority of others I am willing to let
slide in favor of debian-installer; they'd require major rework.
Dan
/--------\ /
gelog (security fixes in modutils and ncurses).
Dan
/\ /----\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University |
| [
he base tarball - adbmouse and friends no
longer work with the new kernels.
* Build with packages from proposed-updates:
- ncurses 5.0-6.0potato1
- modutils 2.3.11-13.1
- dpkg 1.6.15.2 (sparc only)
- kernel 2.2.18pre21 / pcmcia 3.1.22-0.1* (all relevant flavors)
-- Da
I test it) upload. Yes, I know I'm evil.
I could do a source NMU; do you mind, or would you do it yourself, in the
next day or two?
Dan
/\ /----\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| D
1 actually went out, I think) that
there was a security problem in bind and that a fix would be available
within at most a day - which it was. You indicated at the time that
you were willing to wait for it.
Dan
/--------\ /\
|
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 03:43:09PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm going to have to. I need to fix the make bootable from hard drive
> > stuff from powerpc, and I only got the required packages mostly
> >
day or
so, which will need to go into stable - I'll be adding dbootstrap code
for it too, hopefully, and make the powerpc port able to make hard
disks bootable again.
Dan
/\ /\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS C
nd I only got the required packages mostly
finished today - i've still got one to go.
As long as I pay any attention at all I can't break anything that isn't
already broken, though.
Dan
/----\ /----\
| Daniel Jacobowitz
/\ /\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
\/ \/
this has been fixed already.
Actually, I've told you twice now that it was fixed.
Dan
/\ /--------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon Universit
omehow to blame - I hope...
Dan
/\ /----\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
\/ \/
or at least a
day or two after packages are last added before making CDs?
Dan
/\ /--------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University
e may have to
> release without arm after all.
>
> Richard Braakman
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Dan
/----\ /---
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 07:39:03PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:49:03PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > But in fact most of them ARE ironed out - potato CDs have been made by
> > someone or other almost daily for weeks now without major incident.
ther almost daily for weeks now without major incident.
Dan
/--------\ /\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
\/ \/
lso has any number of major problems - including a lack of
threads support, and almost complete uselessness on powerpc.
Dan
/\ /--------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer
53 matches
Mail list logo
