Excerpts from Otto Kekäläinen's message of 2016-07-03 12:46:29 +0100:
> > 3. libmysqlclient.so.18
>
> Here theres's no concensus yet within the pkg-mysql-maint team on this one.
>
And IMO, there won't be one until MariaDB accepts that they've created a
forked library that is API-incompatible wit
ecision is made, but...
>
I appreciate your words very much Steven.
> Clint Byrum wrote:
> > most of these CVE's would remain fully undisclosed and unfixed in both
> > MySQL and MariaDB if the MySQL engineering team or customers had not
> > found them.
>
>
Excerpts from Holger Levsen's message of 2016-01-26 02:45:32 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > However, I have confidence that our friends in the MySQL engineering
> > team can frame the loss of the last foothold for MySQL in Linux di
Excerpts from Steven Chamberlain's message of 2016-01-25 16:48:23 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> As a mere user (systems administrator), I'll share some questions /
> criticisms from my perspective that might help shed some light on the
> underlying issues.
>
> I was wondering why after the 2016-01-19 announce
Excerpts from Holger Levsen's message of 2016-01-25 17:04:57 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> [...other valid points not quoted here…]
> > Assuming MariaDB is affected by the same issues, I may not be in a
> > technically better situation if I switched to
Excerpts from Moritz Mühlenhoff's message of 2016-01-14 13:11:22 -0800:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 08:14:06PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:27:30PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > *Sigh*. And that is exactly the problem (and we've already pointed this
> > > out at De
Excerpts from Emilio Pozuelo Monfort's message of 2015-11-12 01:18:55 -0800:
> On 11/11/15 23:32, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: rm
> >
> > This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
This package is blocking python-repoze.who 2.2-2 from entering testing.
That, in turn, blocks python-pysaml2 v3 from entering testing, which is
in turn blocking keystone from entering testing.
M
Excerpts from Vincent Bernat's message of 2015-07-25 05:28:15 -0700:
> ❦ 23 juillet 2015 07:17 -0700, Clint Byrum :
>
> > I'd be interested to hear the security team's impressions on how shipping
> > micro releases of MySQL has gone for them. They've been
Excerpts from Paul Wise's message of 2015-07-23 21:09:13 -0700:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>
> > The wish of the release team and security team has been to keep just
> > one MySQL variant. If such a decision is made, it must be made above
> > the pkg-mysql-maint team
Excerpts from Emilio Pozuelo Monfort's message of 2015-07-23 01:59:15 -0700:
> On 22/07/15 21:24, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-mysql-ma...@lists.alioth.deb
Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-14 04:01:10 -0800:
> On 14/11/14 12:33, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 22:05:49 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >
> >> On 2014-11-11 19:24, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Daniel Poco
Excerpts from Niels Thykier's message of 2014-11-11 13:05:49 -0800:
> On 2014-11-11 19:24, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-11 00:59:36 -0800:
> >> On 11/11/14 06:05, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>> I t
Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-11 00:59:36 -0800:
> On 11/11/14 06:05, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-10 12:19:19 -0800:
> >> On 10/11/14 20:56, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-10 12:19:19 -0800:
>
> On 10/11/14 20:56, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:31:03 +0100 Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> syslog-nagios-bridge requires pynag 0
Excerpts from Colin Charles's message of 2014-10-01 11:57:41 -0700:
> Hi!
>
> On 2 Oct 2014, at 00:48, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > My personal feeling is that we should include the ones that have a
> > company ready to stake their reputation on it by committing publi
Excerpts from Norvald Ryeng's message of 2014-10-01 11:37:58 -0700:
> - james.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
>
> > On 01/10/14 16:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > >>> If the release team is OK with this, we'll go ahead and upload
> > >>> mysql-5.6 to unstable and raise bugs for the three impacte
Excerpts from Emilio Pozuelo Monfort's message of 2014-10-01 08:01:46 -0700:
> [ Fixing the team@security.d.o Cc ]
>
> On 26/09/14 11:31, James Page wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan
> >
> > On 26/08/14 00:46, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> >> Currently Jessie has version 5.5, and we would anticipate you
> >>
Oops, forgot to include debian-release in the response.
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2014-09-13 19:35:51 -0700:
> Excerpts from Jonathan Wiltshire's message of 2014-09-13 15:01:54 -0700:
> > On 2014-08-26 11:27, Colin Charles wrote:
> > > Upstream will publish security releases for many
Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of 2014-08-26 09:33:39 -0700:
> [fixing team@security.d.o CC]
>
> On 2014-08-26 10:05, Bjoern Boschman wrote:
> > there are already several patches prepared to start mysql-5.6
> > transition for sid [0].
>
> It's rather late for that - as per
> https://lis
Hello Release team.
MySQL in testing is currently 5.5.28.
MySQL in unstable is currently 5.5.29.
MySQL upstream has released 5.5.30.
MySQL 5.5.30 is the current "stable" release of MySQL. We can anticipate
5.5.31 very soon. I suspect there will be security fixes in that release,
although Oracle w
Please refer to [1] as the rest of this message assumes the reader has
read the log thus far.
I have just now comitted MariaDB's test for CVE-2012-4414 to the SVN
repo where we maintain mysql-5.5 unstable packaging. The package fails
to build right now because this test fails.
Lifting the test ou
Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of 2012-06-19 11:24:10 -0700:
> On 19/06/12 19:08, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of 2012-06-19 08:35:29 -0700:
> >> I have tested with gcc-4.4 and it seems to work okay. So that is an option.
>
Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of 2012-06-19 08:35:29 -0700:
> I have tested with gcc-4.4 and it seems to work okay. So that is an option.
>
We should do some general performance benchmarks with 4.4 vs. 4.7 before
we consider this option. It would be a shame to compromise the whole of
my
Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of Sat May 19 08:51:34 -0700 2012:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:18 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > On May 8, 2012, at 2:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 22:52:22 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> > >>
Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of Mon May 21 12:47:19 -0700 2012:
> On 21/05/12 20:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:34:16 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> >> mysql-common>> 5.5 will break 5.1 because there are new configurat
Excerpts from Adam D. Barratt's message of Sat May 19 08:51:34 -0700 2012:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:18 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > On May 8, 2012, at 2:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 22:52:22 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> > >>
On May 8, 2012, at 2:04, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 22:52:22 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> At some point we need to transition from mysql-5.1
.
* Recommend libruby1.8-dev and build-essential instead of suggesting them,
because we have to answer that FAQ too frequently. LP: #244742
.
[ Clint Byrum ]
* debian/patches/50_add_missing_require_yaml.diff require 'yaml' in
lib/rubygems/specification.rb (Closes: #597554)
unblo
libdbi0-dev to libdbi-dev, and rebuild them.
As far as squeeze goes, this probably won't happen. But it should
be doable for Ubuntu 10.10.
Markus, thanks for pushing this out quickly!
On Aug 31, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> Clint Byrum writes:
>> I believe
can download a new fixed version of the 0.8.x series, and upload it to
> experimental (so that Ubuntu gets a chance to have the new package we've
> been working on before 10.10 is out in few month, which was the
> motivation of Clint Byrum).
>
Markus, it would be great if an 0.
Hi Adam, thanks very much for taking a look!
On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 09:17 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> * debian/rules: moving tarball .c files out of the way so swig will
>> rebuild and ship the .py files. (Closes: #
3
days.
please cc: me on any replies as I am not subscribed to debian-release.
Thank you for your time,
--
Clint Byrum
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:/
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 20:53 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Furthermore, d-release is _not_ a discussion list.
>
Point taken, and discussion ended.
--
Clint Byrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
obscure and problem
ridden arches, the users will praise you, and probably those few that
needed those arches will understand.
I'm willing to wait for Debian's stable releases. They are glorious and
legendary in their correctness. But please please *please* stop this
madness.
--
Clint Byrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Forgive me if this has been discussed before. I searched the archives of
debian-user, debian-devel, and debian-release, and saw nothing about
htis.
It appears that Sarge will be called 3.1. Why is that? I personally
think it should be 4.0, as do many others I have spoken with..
1) Kernel v2.2 is
36 matches
Mail list logo
