Re: Dropping 386 support

2004-10-04 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 07:54:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > The d-i images really need to be built from kernel-image packages that > > are in the archive at the time we ship. Optimizing for 486 isn't a very > > good reason on its own to force another kernel build cycle.

Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.4.27 as default 2.4 kernel for sarge

2004-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:47:29AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > It will be 2.6.8. > > If you write 2.6.8, do you mean 2.6.8.1? Or is the diff to .1 included > in the Debian packages? I cannot find a hint and the version number is > misleading. Given the diff to .1 is tiny and four-digit versi

Re: 2.6.8 release

2004-08-02 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:54:08AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > the revision or the version is about the same amount of work to get it > > being used. So no gain there. > > And its too late for d-i anyway, was probably already last week. Even my > 2.6.7-4 .udeb kernels didn't make it in. Well,