Bug#880622: stretch-pu: package python-arpy/1.1.1-2

+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +python-arpy (1.1.1-2+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=low + + [ Scott Kitterman ] + * Correct substitution variable for python3 interpreter depends (Closes: +#867418) + + [ Christoph Egger ] + * Upload to stable + + -- Christoph Egger Thu, 02 Nov 2017 22:14:48 +0100 +

Bug#860414: jessie-pu: package apt-xapian-index/0.47

On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:47:05 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > +apt-xapian-index (0.47+nmu1) jessie; urgency=medium > > 0.47+deb8u1, please. With that change, please feel free to upload. Uhm indeed. Uploaded! Christoph pgpIf7S3iSs05.pgp Description: OpenPGP

Bug#860414: jessie-pu: package apt-xapian-index/0.47

t-xapian-index (0.47+nmu1) jessie; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Remove call to update-python-modules (Closes: #793681) + + -- Christoph Egger Sun, 16 Apr 2017 14:38:29 +0200 + apt-xapian-index (0.47) unstable; urgency=low [ Enrico Zini ] diff -Nru apt-xapian-index-0.47/

Re: is the whole unstable still broken by gcc-5?

Andrei POPESCU writes: > On Sb, 12 sep 15, 23:27:48, Виталий Филиппов wrote: >> >> Maybe adding jessie into sources.list will help to calm resolver... > > I'd rather suggest stretch. While helpfull with normal transitions this is basically pointless with the GCC5 one as library packages are not

Bug#795794: jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Control: tags -1 + confirmed >> >> On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 22:51 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: >> > This is a small patch from mozilla hg. It fixes #774195 and is >

Bug#795794: jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1

ngelog 2015-08-15 12:40:34.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +nss (2:3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium + + [ Andrew Ayer ] + * Apply upstream patch (99_prefer_stronger_cert_chains.patch) to fix +certificate chain generation to prefer stronger/newer certificates + over weaker/older ce

Re: possibility of jessie-kfreebsd suite

Hi! Ansgar and me have been discussing the archive setup for jessie-kfreebsd yesterday. Basically there's going to be a jessie-kfreebsd and jessie-p-u-kfreebsd thing on ftp-master where the jessie-p-u-kfreebsd automatically pulls in new uploads from jessie-p-u via some dak script (allowing speci

Re: possibility of jessie-kfreebsd suite

Hi! Ansgar Burchardt writes: > Christoph Egger writes: >> I was told you would be supportive of an unofficial kfreebsd jessie >> release and willing to add a suite for that. Guess I write here what I >> think would be best from our point of view and you tell me i

Re: Final kfreebsd-10 upload before freeze?

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Christoph Egger wrote: >> Uploading kfreebsd-10 10.1-RC4 in a minute and I guess see for -final > > Final release has been tagged. After the setlogin security fix, there > was only one more change - but it's kind of odd: > > http:

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: >> DSA can't >> maintain rolling releases or testing systems for any length of time. > > I'm not quite sure what you mean; particularly how those involve DSA. > What systems would you need to maintain besides the buildds for sid? It means we need a stable release

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

Hi all! First, I do not really know enough about release workflow I guess to know what -release@ does not want to do for kfreebsd apart from stamping it as an official release so some of my whishes may be totally reasonable or way of -- please tell me! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Andreas Barth

Re: Final kfreebsd-10 upload before freeze?

Ahoi! Christoph Egger writes: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: >> On 31/10/14 12:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >>> kfreebsd-10 migrated last night; is there a chance another upload of >>> the kernel could go into sid and be aged in before the freeze starts? >>

Re: Final kfreebsd-10 upload before freeze?

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes: > On 31/10/14 12:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> kfreebsd-10 migrated last night; is there a chance another upload of >> the kernel could go into sid and be aged in before the freeze starts? > > That would be bug fixes only, right? I'd be fine with an unblock of >

Re: Final kfreebsd-10 upload before freeze?

Hi Steven, hi release@ Julien Cristau writes: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:43:36 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> kfreebsd-10 migrated last night; is there a chance another upload of >> the kernel could go into sid and be aged in before the freeze starts? >> > Leaving aside the first questio

Re: stumpwm REMOVED from testing

Milan Zamazal writes: > On 26. srpna 2014 18:39:16 CEST, Debian testing watch > wrote: >>FYI: The status of the stumpwm source package >>in Debian's testing distribution has changed. >> >> Previous version: 2:0.9.8-5 >> Current version: (not in testing) >> Hint:

Re: PHP security upload not included in 6.0.9

"Thijs Kinkhorst" writes: > On Mon, February 17, 2014 09:45, Lior Kaplan wrote: >> 1. First time I encounter this problem, any idea where can I see the >> buildd >> logs for these security uploads to see >> why haven't they built fine. > > The security team receives those. I'll forward them to you

Bug#726032: transition: GNOME 3.8: gnome-desktop (and all the rest)

Robert Millan writes: > Michael Biebl: >> TTBOMK there is no working 3D support on kfreebsd which would allow >> to run GNOME Shell on kfreebsd > > Can you be more specific? AFAIK we've got a working OpenGL implementation. I've got Intel KMS running on my notebook and it claims to have full 3D ac

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

Hi, I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For kfreebsd-*, I - test packages on this architecture This includes running a Desktop (Notebook) System on testing and am therefore testing the relevant stack

default-jdk change on kfreebsd

Moin! Steven Chamberlain writes: > On 16/08/13 13:15, Christoph Egger wrote: >> I talked to rene here at DebConf. The problems did show up in the past >> when running the testsuite (hangs). Rene tried with current OpenJDK on >> falla -- in current kfreebsd sid -- and it does

Bug#704227: pu: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-11

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 18:50 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> This went into sid with version 9.0+ds1-11 and has migrated to jessie. >> >> For a pu upload, would the version number have to be 9.0+ds1-11+deb7u1 ? > > The version needs to be lower than that in testing,

Bug#703781: unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-10

ch by Steven Chamberlain to make rpc.lockd start without +`-h' arguments (Closes: #664812) + * Add me to uploaders + + -- Christoph Egger Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:54:48 +0100 + freebsd-utils (9.0+ds1-9) unstable; urgency=low [ Steven Chamberlain ] diff -Nru freebsd-utils-9.0+ds1/debian/contro

Re: Bug#696757: ecl: FTBFS: hang in sigsuspend

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Would it be an option to configure ecl with --enable-threads=no on > kfreebsd-* and hurd-* for wheezy? Would any functionality be lost or > would it only affect performance? The version in squeeze didn't have > threads enabled, and there don't seem to be any rde

Re: Bug#702799: unblock: sks/1.1.3-2

Hi! Christoph Martin writes: > included is a debdiff. I would upload to testing-updates(?) as soon as > you approve. unstable would be the target here as the version in testing and unstable are identical ;-) and you can upload there right away if you're confident -release will grant the unblock

Bug#702206: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > On 04/03/13 01:15, Christoph Egger wrote: >> +graphviz (2.26.3-13) unstable; urgency=low >> [...] >> + [ Christoph Egger ] >> + * Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: >> #701832) > > Th

Bug#702206: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-13

7; file to graphviz-doc package + + [ Christoph Egger ] + * Import patch by Steven Chamberlain to fix hangs on kfeebsd (Closes: #701832) + + -- David Claughton Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:10:00 +0100 + graphviz (2.26.3-12) unstable; urgency=low * Fixes to explicitly use ruby 1.8 as default for ruby

Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1

Hi! intrigeri writes: > Michael Meskes wrote (27 Dec 2012 11:21:56 GMT) : >>> > Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the >>> > whole new release? > >> Where does fixing the XFS problem differ from fixing the other bugs >> in 4.01? > > As I understand it (and not be

Bug#699148: unblock: celery/2.5.3-2

Hi! Michael Fladischer writes: > On 2013-02-28 21:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Any news on an upload? > > 2.5.3-3 is prepared in SVN but paravoid (my sponsor on celery) seems > to be busy. Uploaded Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze

Hi! Matthias Klose writes: > - Afaik openjdk-7 for kfreebsd does build on kfreebsd (according to Damien) >with the kfreebsd kernel from wheezy. So maybe some commitment could be >found to upgrade and maintain the kernels before wheezy is released? Actually as far as I could narrow it

Bug#700277: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze4

Hi! Steven Chamberlain writes: > Yes please! I was just about to ask if anyone is available to do this. > > The changes in SVN match exactly the diff just approved in #700277. > > Or it may be easier to apply the diff against the extracted source of > 8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze3, and dpkg-buildpackage -

Bug#700277: pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze4

Hi Steven! "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 00:44 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 06:15:37PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:21 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> > > On 10/02/13 22:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > > > On Sun

Bug#697190: unblock: virtuoso-opensource/6.1.4+dfsg1-2

Steven Chamberlain writes: > Hi, > > On 26/01/13 23:02, intrigeri wrote: >> José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote (16 Jan 2013 17:33:25 GMT) : >>> I've uploaded Virtuoso again because in the -2 revision of the package I >>> did >>> wrong fix for this bug: >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#697027: unblock: fife/0.3.3+r3-3

2012-10-26 11:55:12.0 -0700 +++ fife-0.3.3+r3/debian/changelog 2012-12-30 12:53:48.0 -0800 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +fife (0.3.3+r3-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * Include NMU by Anton Gladky, thanks! + + -- Christoph Egger Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:53:30 -0800 + +fife (0.3.3+r3-2

Bug#697006: unblock: freebsd-libs/9.0+ds1-3

--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/changelog 2012-05-25 09:37:58.0 -0700 +++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/changelog 2012-12-29 15:49:51.0 -0800 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +freebsd-libs (9.0+ds1-4) unstable; urgency=low + + [ Christoph Egger ] + * Upload to unstable + + [ Jeff Epler

Bug#697005: unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-9

) + * If devfs is unavailable (for example in a jail environment) the +freebsd-utils start action would exit with non-zero status, causing postinst +to fail. Instead, return zero exit status but print a warning. +(Closes: #695679) + + [ Christoph Egger ] + * Import patch from Steven

Re: libgeom: may cause segfault of grub-probe

Christoph Egger writes: > I'd like to hear -release@'s opinion on that. Do you prefer the > smaller patch only fixing the implicit declarations/includes where we > know it has caused this segfaults or can I upload the full change below? Oh sorry I should read more carefull.

Re: libgeom: may cause segfault of grub-probe

Hi all! I'd like to hear -release@'s opinion on that. Do you prefer the smaller patch only fixing the implicit declarations/includes where we know it has caused this segfaults or can I upload the full change below? Regards Christoph Steven Chamberlain writes: > This is a multi-part messa

Bug#691188: unblock: [pre-approval] ncmpcpp/0.5.10-1.1

Hi! Julien Cristau writes: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 21:10:13 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > >> I would really like to get #676627 fixed for wheezy. Although it >> might not be strictly RC I think failing to display the content (when >> no configuration is present and

Bug#694573: unblock: jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5

Steven Chamberlain writes: > On 09/12/12 09:26, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2012-11-28 00:12, Adrian Knoth wrote: >>> [...] >>> unblock jackd2/1.9.8~dfsg.4+20120529git007cdc37-5 >> [...] >> There is a build failure on kfreebsd-amd64 stalling the migration to >> testing. Could you please have a loo

Bug#694109: Make that kfreebsd-9_9.0-10

(9.0-10) unstable; urgency=low - * Build source package on a kfreebsd system -* This should bring back the udebs lost in -7 + * Revert "Touch conf/DEBIAN" causing build failures in "normal" mode + + -- Christoph Egger Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:32:25 -0800 + +kfreebsd-9

Bug#694109: unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-9

emory access without proper validation in linux compat system +(Closes: #694097) + * Touch conf/DEBIAN to avoid build failures in case someone wants to build the +kernel with firmware included. + + -- Christoph Egger Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:45:15 -0800 - -- Christoph Egger Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:

Bug#694108: unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-6

+ + * Apply patch for SA-12:08 / CVE-2012-4576: +memory access without proper validation in linux compat system +(Closes: #694096) + + -- Christoph Egger Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:10:40 -0800 + kfreebsd-8 (8.3-5) unstable; urgency=medium [ Robert Millan ] diff -Nru kfreebsd-8-8.3/debian

Bug#692169: unblock: kfreebsd-8/8.3-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kfreebsd-8 kfreebsd-8 (8.3-5) unstable; urgency=medium [ Robert Millan ] * Remove /boot symlink kludge. (Closes: #672255) [ Christoph Egger ] * Import

Bug#691781: unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kfreebsd-9 <<< debian/changelog * Pick SVN 239447 from FreeBSD 9-STABLE to fix a remote DoS vulnerability of SCTP (CVE-2012-3549) (Closes: #686962) >>> unblo

Bug#691372: unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.10

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package common-lisp-controller This is a translation-only update that should go into wheezy unblock common-lisp-controller/7.10 Regards Christoph -- System Informatio

Bug#691188: unblock: [pre-approval] ncmpcpp/0.5.10-1.1

@@ +ncmpcpp (0.5.10-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix displaying of playlist in column mode if no config file is present +using the patch applied upstream (See upstream bug #3490 / commit +6126def6). (Closes: #676627) + + -- Christoph Egger Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11

ncmpcpp: column-mode fix for wheezy?

Hi! I'm wondering whether one could get the fix into wheezy. The upstream patch [0] looks easy enough although it's probably hard to argue this is actually RC -- it's really annoying to get presented a seemingly empty playlist. Regards Christoph [0] http://repo.or.cz/w/ncmpcpp.git/commit

Bug#690070: unblock: dkms/2.2.0.3-1.2

0 -0700 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +dkms (2.2.0.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Don't fail if kernel major version number is not single-digit (like on +kfreebsd-10) (Closes: 688904) + + -- Christoph Egger Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:52:34 -0700 + dkms (2.2.0.3-1.1

Bug#688449: unblock: kfreebsd-9/9.0-6

0 -0700 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +kfreebsd-9 (9.0-6) unstable; urgency=low + + * Team upload. + * Pick SVN 236364 from FreeBSD-9 to fix a kernel panic on pf config +reload if counters are used (Closes: #688268) + + -- Christoph Egger Sat, 22 Sep 2012 11:32:52 -0700 + kfreebsd-9 (9.0-5) unstable;

Bug#688333: pu: package libgc/6.8-1.2

Hi! "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 20:18 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: >> I'd like to fix CVE-2012-2673 / #677195 in stable. I've prepared a >> update using the the patch backported to 6.8 by ubuntu (debdiff >> attached). I'll

Bug#688333: pu: package libgc/6.8-1.2

ngson-2f Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -u libgc-6.8/debian/control libgc-6.8/debian/control --- libgc-6.8/debian/control +++ libgc-6.8/debian/control @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Source: libgc -Maintainer: Ryan Murray +Maintainer: Chr

Bug#683276: unblock: consolekit/0.4.5-3.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package consolekit This fixes an segfaulting error, the patch is minimal and tested (see #570015) unblock consolekit/0.4.5-3.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-

Bug#681145: unblock: libgc/7.1-9

11 00:30:07.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libgc (1:7.1-9) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Import patches to fix CVE-2012-2673 from upstream git (Closes: #677195) + + -- Christoph Egger Sun, 08 Jul 2012 18:27:48 +0200 + libgc (1:7.1-8) unstable; urgency=low * Import patch by Thorsten Glaser dif

Re: xine-lib*: failed builds due to breakage: dep-wait?

Hi! Cyril Brulebois writes: > peter green (28/01/2012): >> I'm not a RT member but I don't think a dep-wait will help you here. Afaict >> dep-waits are only checked by wanna-build against what is available in the >> archive, they aren't checked against what is installed in the buildd chroots. >

Re: [SRM] updating ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk

Hi! "Thijs Kinkhorst" writes: >> ia32-libs: cups 1.4.4-7+squeeze1 is missing the kfreebsd-amd64 package. >> It looks like it failed to build previously - does anyone still have the >> log available to find out why? > > We never received the log nor package at security-master. I'm CC'ing the

Bug#641031: pu: package sbcl/1:1.0.40.0-3

g --- sbcl-1.0.40.0/debian/changelog +++ sbcl-1.0.40.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +sbcl (1:1.0.40.0-3) stable; urgency=low + + * Fix reference to undefined asdf::split in the asdf-install module +(Closes: #640951) + + -- Christoph Egger Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:12:22 +0200 + sbcl (1:1.0.40.0-2

Bug#638754: nmu: libdevice-cdio-perl_0.2.4-5

Hi! Dominic Hargreaves writes: > gb libdevice-cdio-perl_0.2.4-5 . mips mipsel s390 sparc Done that now. Leaving the nmu for -release Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Bug#638754: nmu: libdevice-cdio-perl_0.2.4-5

Hi! Dominic Hargreaves writes: > This should now succeed, following the fix for #579450 (and #626322) > > nmu libdevice-cdio-perl_0.2.4-5 . armel i386 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel > powerpc s390 sparc . -m "Rebuild against perl 5.12" Is there any reason you ut ppc in there? according to the buildd

Bug#616621: nmu: for libsigsegv transition

Hi! Julien Cristau writes: > Status update after a month... > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 01:31:33 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > >> libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending >> packages need to be rebuild. The depwait is needed as 2.9-1 mis

Bug#616621: nmu: for libsigsegv transition

"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 01:31 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: >> libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending >> packages need to be rebuild. The depwait is needed as 2.9-1 misses the >> actual shared library by

Bug#616621: nmu: for libsigsegv transition

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu libsigsegv in unstable changes soname for the library so all depending packages need to be rebuild. The depwait is needed as 2.9-1 misses the actual shared library by accident (#616576) so pa

Bug#616598: nmu: supertuxkart_0.7+dfsg1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi! I've uploaded a new libirrlicht which, as it unfortunately breaks ABI needed a new soname. Please nmu supertuxkart (only reverse-dep) to pick up the new dependency. nmu supertuxkart

Re: Bug#610461: trac-mercurial bug

Hi! Jürgen A. Erhard writes: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:04:59PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: >> Can you describe what I need to do to trigger that bug? I've set up >> a local trac (debian trac + trac-mercurial running on tracd mostly >> everything default). &

Re: sks bugfix for 599029

Julien Cristau writes: > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 14:23:23 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: > >> Thanks for the answer. The upload now succeded. >> > +DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += $(if $(BYTECODE)," nostrip",) > > Is that guaranteed to get exported to dh_strip's environment? It at least seems to work on th

Re: what to do with clisp/libsigsegv?

Julien Cristau writes: > Hrm, redoing the packaging from scratch is not something I'd be happy to > accept into a frozen distro... Can't the existing RC bugs (#494587 and > #592768, as far as I can tell) be fixed without that, and the revamped > packaging be left for wheezy? #494587 looks closed

Re: libgc + the ecl situation

Julien Cristau writes: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 22:06:08 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> The ecl package currently is still affected by [0] -- RC bug caused >> by a build failure / embedded copy of libgc. The upload to experimental, >> wh

libgc + the ecl situation

Hi all! The ecl package currently is still affected by [0] -- RC bug caused by a build failure / embedded copy of libgc. The upload to experimental, where a new enough libgc is already available did improve definitely. As I'm going to adopt libgc (do we want it in pkg-common-lisp btw?) I coul

Bug#572839: UNS: Re: Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:49:49AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > e...@ron:~$ wajig policy libgraphviz-dev > libgraphviz-dev: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 2.20.2-8+b1 > Version table: > 2.20.2-8+b1 0 > 990 http://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages > -1 http:/

Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

Hi all! On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:05:47PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 9 March 2010 at 21:33, David Claughton wrote: > | That would be the latest 2.26.3 version. It's in experimental now, > | unfortunately I overlooked that ggobi doesn't compile against it (as it > | stands), or I would

Re: Give Back for glademm

Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:28:29PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: >> Can you please give back glademm on alpha, mips, mipsel and powerpc as it >> failed >> to build there on some dependency problems for gtkmm which are not present >> (an

Give Back for glademm

Hi Can you please give back glademm on alpha, mips, mipsel and powerpc as it failed to build there on some dependency problems for gtkmm which are not present (any more?) Regards Christoph signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature