g.
Christian
diff -u hp2xx-3.4.4/debian/changelog hp2xx-3.4.4/debian/changelog
--- hp2xx-3.4.4/debian/changelog
+++ hp2xx-3.4.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+hp2xx (3.4.4-10) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * include patch by Martin Kroeker to fix crashes found by Jodie Cunningham
+
+ -- Chri
Adam,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:44:37AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On 2015-03-30 20:17, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> >I received a report for crashes in hp2xx which were found with American
> >fuzzy lop (afl). For unstable I already
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
I received a report for crashes in hp2xx which were found with American
fuzzy lop (afl). For unstable I already uploaded -10 with the following
patch. It should apply to the
/changelog2012-06-30 18:42:17.0
+0200
+++ gle-graphics-4.2.4c/debian/changelog2012-10-01 00:03:06.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+gle-graphics (4.2.4c-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * fix building on hurd-i386 with workaround from #578320
+
+ -- Christian T. Steigies Sun
Moin,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 11:36:48PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hi, ...
>
> As you may know, or not, we are waiting for the abi-breaking 2.6.18-6 to be
> uploaded for pushing the 2.6.18 kernel into etch.
>
> It seems 2.6.18.3 is announced for saturday, so this would mean a natural
> tentativ
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 06:01:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 01:09:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:52:59 +0200 (CEST), Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:05:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:00:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 03:11:20PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> I apologize; I was going by the information on
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=xfree86 which shows that
> no log was submitted for the buildd database, perhaps because it
> required special attention to build.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:22:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 02:45:56PM +0100, Willi Mann wrote:
> > The current versions of luola-levels (5.1-1) and luola (1.2.5-1) in testing
> > are incompatible which caused RC-bug 292803.
>
> > I've talked to the maintainer and he
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 06:40:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
> > A few days ago I filed Bug#263117 (FTBFS on m68k) on FFTW3.
> > Justin Pryzby just sent me an email saying that the package
> > is orphaned. Both of us very much want
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:55:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > Could someone (David? Adam?) please do what's necessary to tag
> > boot-floppies 3.0.8, for initial ia64 and basedebs support?
>
> 3.0.8 source is uploaded.
Do we have a new busybox yet which fixes the wge
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:46:44PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Yes, it pulls from a archive. I don't know if woody cdrom images are
> around so I always pull from http.us.debian.org or whatever.
I haven't seen any woody images yet, especially not for m68k.
> Excellent to hear. Are you going
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Besides that m68k suffers from a busybox<->linux-2.2 incompatiblity, Richard
> > is working on a fix. I guess I may not tell more right now ;-)
>
> Huh, well, be sure to file bugs against busybox if needed.
I built a busybox with R
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > ROOTCMD := $(shell [d -u = 0 ] || echo sudo)
> > Guess it will fail when I build as root, and no sudo is installed.
>
> Just replace the "sudo" part by whatever you use to achieve root
> (super should work too).
I
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it?
>
> If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please
> make it very clear, perhaps with subject of [APPLY PATCH PLS].
I applied the subarch/system p
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
>
> Anyway, so far I hit a problem with rescue.sh doing tests on
> $system for 'atari', etc, when rescue.sh has been invoked with
> $subarch='atari' and $system=''. For now I've swapped $system
> for $subarch in rescue.sh and am carry
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This
> is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting
> things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't have an
> install system and
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 03:49:15PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 03:13:56PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > Did you do 'make check' ? Are you building with the language chooser
> > per chance? Odd. It shouldn't be running this stuff unless you're
> > building with the
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:15:07AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Things should be ready for the 2.2r2 release soon. The only outstanding
> issue I have is sparc boot-floppies, which should be done today.
>
> Are there any other outstanding issues with the other ports that I don't
> know about yet?
>
boot-floppies 2.2.18 seem to have a missing build-depends on python-dev:
[...]
iconv -f `head -1 swedish.src | sed -e 's/^.*charset="\([^"]*\)".*/\1/' -t
utf-8 < swedish.src > swedish.xml
gcc -c -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -pipe
-I/usr/include/python1.5 iconv.c
iconv.c:22: Python
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 12:48:34PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > [m68k] no 2.2.18 yet, maybe we will have a new set of 2.2.10 kernels, but
> >they should be tested a little by our users. We might build 2.2.16 or
> >17 kernels, but I think there is not enough time to test this.
>
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:54:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Here's the current status of 2.2r2 release plans, in order of expected
> completion, along with those responsible:
>
> - Kernel 2.2.18-pre21 builds (ports who want it). Let me know who wants
> this, and when you can get it done. If y
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 07:36:30PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Here's the list of pkgs from potato-porposed-updates which I used for
> boot-floppies 2.2.17:
>
> base-config_0.33_i386.deb
> debconf-tiny_0.2.80.17_all.deb
> libc6_2.1.3-13_i386.deb
> locales_2.1.3-13_i386.deb
> makedev
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:36:17PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> No, dude, it's just the exact same as README-Users.m4, just
> translated. It should be handled just the same.
>
> > Its impossible to upload this, since builds for other
> > arches will probably also have this file, for their specia
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 02:16:44PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> boot-floppies 2.2.17 i386 is now in Incoming, and also
> http://auric.debian.org/~aph/>.
>
> We'll be building 2.2.18 hopefully within a few days, so please try
> this out quickly so we can see if it has any bad bugs.
I built it f
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 08:50:36PM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > Just to make sure that we're all in sync: I'm currently waiting for 2.2.15
> > disk sets to be uploaded for each architecture. I'm under the impression
> > that these are being bui
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 07:14:19PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> That's part one, but where I see another large problem is the latency
> between the time something gets known to need work, and the time the
> rebuilt package actually gets installed on the FTP site.
I never had any problems lik
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 03:36:57PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
> "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm afraid that that is not at all apparent to someone that's not
> closely involved with the m68k port. Perhaps some sort of pointer
>
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 12:47:37PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
>
> To summarise, if you want CDs for your architecture, do whatever
> it takes to get the archive into a valid state, tell me you've done
> it, grab a copy of the CD once I've made it, and tell me it works.
"We" did not cry for the CDs
30 matches
Mail list logo
