Re: 2.2r3 preparation

Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > The only thing in proposed updates that looks relevant to me is the > new kernels, 2.2.18 (rather than the pre21 version). Clearly we need > the PCMCIA stuff and the idepci/compact kernels. New working PCMCIA packages are in the incoming directory. I ca

Re: 2.2.18pre kernels and pcmcia in 2.2rN

To: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with that. Anyhow, that seems to be what we're doing, so all > should be well in 2.2r2. [ ... ] > I've tested the idepci and compact flavors, and they seem to work > great. Excellent! Sounds like everything is okay. - Brian

Re: 2.2.18pre kernels and pcmcia in 2.2rN

Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The potato pcmcia package (3.1.20) does not work with the 2.2.18pre > > kernels. We need to either patch it or use the one from woody. Seems > > like using the woody one would make more sense at this point... Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added: >

Re: preparing boot-floppies 2.2.17

Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: adam> Can you clue me on where the 2.2.17-1 vanilla and ide flavors are? adam> I can't find them on auric, or in proposed updates. Brian Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: brian> They are sitting in incoming on ftp-master.d

Re: preparing boot-floppies 2.2.17

Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you clue me on where the 2.2.17-1 vanilla and ide flavors are? I > can't find them on auric, or in proposed updates. They are sitting in incoming on ftp-master.debian.org. My first attempt at an upload didn't have the orig.tar.gz file. > Do you or

Re: preparing boot-floppies 2.2.17

Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If someone could do a new build of 2.2.17/CVS boot-floppies and put > up a URL for folks to download the i386 build stuff, that would be > excellent. I generally put them on va or auric. Please announce both > here and on I have built the pcmcia-module

Re: kernels in potato destabilized

> On Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 06:29:57PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I ask that you hold i386 kernels in Incoming until the other flavors > > and the accompanying pcmcia-modules packages are also to be found in > > Incoming. That ensures the consistency and coherency of Potato and > > the ability

Re: critical potato archive inconsistency

Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The source upload for pcmcia-{cs,source,modules}_3.1.8-12 is missing. Okay. I've fixed this. I had uploaded the new version, but the automatic installer kept rejecting the upload because some of the later pcmcia-modules* packages for the newer kernels