On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 08:06 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 00:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:35:30PM -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > > I note that one of the issues
nt, vore.debian.org is back on line; the underlying issue, though,
> seems to be that vore, like the buildds, won't necessarily *stay* on-line
> due to some hard-to-pin kernel bugs that keep taking the systems down.
Vore is stable now.
--
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Develo
I say ditch it. Just one step closer to sparc32 not being supported at
all. Maybe dropping support will give some people incentive to work on it
(if there is anyone out there really wanting it at all).
> P.S. For sparc64 I plan to add dual boot support (both 2.6 and 2.4) to the
> CD images soon.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:11:27PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:01:12PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > So I suppose it won't be OK, then... better provide an alternative
> > > package ?
> >
> > Better to not provide an alternati
de an alternative. It would be useless. Fsck is run
from automated scripts, so no-one would get the fixes without a lot of
mucking around.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
lease_id=73260
If it is really that important, raise the severity of the bug, and we
will certainly have to fix it for release.
--
.--===-=-==-=---=====----=-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
ed.
>
> Due to that, I'm building boot-floppies 3.0.13 now. Below is the
> changelogs.
>
> Quick turn-around, but how can that hurt, eh?
Sparc is building as we speak.
--
.--===-=-==-=-------=----=-=-.
/ Ben Collins -- ...on t
ready for sun4u.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
ks-sparc/current/
(FYI)
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
est showing the current state of things as
"woody" _was_ shown as "stable" and potato was shown as "archived". Can
this be updated aswell?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
o it still pops up with the warning, but allows the user to
continue.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
s potato or woody?
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
er version to unstable, or make the new
version go to unstable/stable both (assuming it is built on stable).
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
us bug where root cannot use ldd on a program
that is sgid. It works for suid applications though. This stands to
break package builds as root, because dpkg-shlibdeps requires ldd.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fant
st stick with 2.2.18 ? (I gather not...)
Sparc has pre11 in incoming, so go with that for us (I can change it, if
you want).
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PR
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:50:09AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:15:38PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > It seems to me this libc6 stuff isn't well tested and shoudl not be
> > > installed into Potato.
> >
> > Can you cat /usr/includ
/linux/version.h please?
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:03:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:15:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I thought those were uploaded. If they are, then they need to be. I was
> >
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:15:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:15:07AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Things should be ready for the 2.2r2 release soon. The only outstanding
> > issue I have is sparc boot-floppies, which should be done today.
>
>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:08:19PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:00:51PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > FYI, I did a full build with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" and it built with no
>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:00:51PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > FYI, I did a full build with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" and it built with no
> > problems on sparc.
>
> AFAIK there are still pcmcia issues on i386. The pcmcia package doesn't
>
rectories in the tree,
else it failed to build.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
xfree_3.3.6 atm. With a
> little luck, this might be finished as well tomorrow. Hmm, I think I could
> need another fast machine...
Sounds good.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/L
y now, barring
anything unforseen.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
be, built
independently of each other).
The packages used for the root disk isn't affected by security issues
since it is only used for installs, which are always run as root anyway.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
about *now*. I'm not assuming things
will happen, they already have, and the known issues need to be included.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 01:28:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:02:47AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So do we want to change that to "wait for 2.2r3" just after releasing
> > 2.2r2? IMO, if the securty fixes don't get it, there is no way w
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:35:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 08:53:49AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So we release immediately even though there are major security updates and
> > package revisions that need to be done? That sounds like RH release goals
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 09:01:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Some further notes, starting at the end:
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:54:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > This looks like everything. I think we can probably get this completed in
> > less than two wee
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:39:29AM +0100, Christian Meder wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 11:54:03PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > - Update packages. This is in a per arch basis, and only if absolutely
> > essential (this applies to out-of-date packages only). You can update
r the openssh security fix to be compiled. [3 days]
This looks like everything. I think we can probably get this completed in
less than two weeks (giving extra time because of US holiday).
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
ber, or just rebuild the
main one, so that the binary-all packages dep on ${Source-Version} instead
of ${Version}.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
orning. I need to build new 2.2.17 kernel images
too.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
2.2r1.
>
But still, if we are going to make that assumption, then we should call
this one 2.2r1, and not skip the nomenclature. It's confusing.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU
?
Makes much more sense to me. First revision means you revised something.
So we can't call the first potato release revision 1 because we didn't
revisise 2.2 at all. IMO r1 should be what we call the next point release.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
'll take care of that myself.
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:12:36PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian-cd/
> >
> >These are exportable (no non-US) images for all 6 archs. Because of space
> >limitations on ftp.debian.org, only CD #1 is available f
debian.org.
Note, these images are not available via rsync.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 07:41:59PM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > Because of a problem with the busybox tar on the boot-floppies, the sparc
> > base2_2.tgz, when untar'd, was causing / to become mode 644. I have put a
>
er, please wait till the
mirror you use has this set before creating the sparc CD images.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECT
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
cle?
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
on a slink system, if it is running a
2.0.x kernel (for sparc atleast).
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
least 48 hours
> to burn 2.2.13 source and all arches to upload.
>
> This is RC for i386 at least.
I need a fix in for sparc too. I'll have it commited tonight. It's fairly
minor.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
be met on the
first CD.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
plex for boot-floppies. I think Herbert
has the right approach.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:36:21AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Uggh, can you make it kernel-foo-2.2.15_2.2.15-pre19-1? This way in the
> > boot-floppies we can actually change the version of the kernel it lo
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 10:17:08AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 08:05:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Not the package name, just the version. So it just says "2.2.14". There is
> > one entry for each arch.
>
> Well if it's th
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:18:31AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > I think we need to get a kernel-source-2.2.15 package in right now, even
> > if it means that it is actually a 2.2.15-pre19 (the latest pre)
right now, even
if it means that it is actually a 2.2.15-pre19 (the latest pre). This way
we can start building images, and have boot-floppies using it. I'm very
sure it will release before we do.
Herbert, is this possible for you?
--
---===-=-==-=---=---
signature: public key not found
>
> Despite the GPG issues, will this be able to percolate into potato?
I've resigned this along with uploading sparc boot-floppies for 2.2.9.
Richard says he will get to it tomorrow.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--
signature: public key not found
>
> Despite the GPG issues, will this be able to percolate into potato?
Why not just resign it for him Adam? Should work ok.
--
---===-=-======-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... --
that emacs19 will _not_ compile on glibc 2.1 systems, and IMO, it needs to
be removed or fixed from potato (off topic, but just thinking out loud).
I'm trying to get the sparc autobuilder cluster back up (dead main board
on the NFS server for this group), and then I can investigate.
Wichert,
the missing packages or
> release anyway?
Try posting a list of the packages that need to be compiled by non-i386
archs to respective arch lists please. It is quite difficult to parse out
that info from posts to debian-devel.
--
---===-=-==-=---=------
e-management side?
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
and fill in the blanks?
Just a quick note, I will be working on getting sparc ready tomorrow and
thursday.
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 02:15:45PM +0200, Christian Meder wrote:
> you forget about the time when the decision was made: 2.0.35 was known
> to be stable (uptimes of more than 100 days), 2.2.1 was _supposed_ to be
> stable but we didn't know it back then.
>
> To cut it short:
> To support both 2.0.
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 01:40:51PM +0200, Christian Meder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 03:26:37PM +, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > > I agree -- it's fine to upgrade to kernel 2.2.x in slink, but
> > > upgrading libc is just too much of
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 03:37:33PM +0200, Christian Meder wrote:
> > This is completely untrue. In fact the slink sparc release was with a
> > 2.2.1 kernel _because_ it was more stable than the 2.0.x kernels for this
> > architecture.
>
> Sorry to say that your comment is only partially true ;-)
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 12:40:34PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> The big unknown for a linux 2.2 and slink is other architectures.
> Personally, I have my doubts that the linux 2.2 kernel is more robust
> and stable than 2.0 for non-i386 architectures. Anyhow, hopefully we
> will allow the archite
63 matches
Mail list logo
