Andreas Barth wrote:
> we decided to configure the testing migration script to ignore missing
binaries on arm for now.
From
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=freetennis
I read that the only reason this package isn't entering testing is "not
yet built on arm". So I wonder what is happe
> No, what allowed sarge to go out the door with DFSG violations was an
unambigous GR by a majority of the debian developers who decided to
include
those non-free firmware (and GFDL docs, and some random fonts, and ...),
into
sarge even though they didn't quite meet the DFSG.
>
> That vote is not v
May I remind you all that debian-release is NOT a discussion list?
I think the respective positions are clear. Now can the release team
please step in and say what their view on the matter is, which AFAICS is
the only reason why this thread should belong to this list?
Gerardo
3 matches
Mail list logo
