Bug#1033467: unblock: golang-github-yuin-goldmark/1.5.4-1

5.3-1 to 1.5.4-1. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing unblock golang-github-yuin-goldmark/1.5.4-1 Many thanks! Anthony Fok diff -Nru golang-github-yuin-goldmark-1.5.3/d

Bug#1033442: unblock: golang-go.opencensus/0.24.0-1

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 3:33 PM Anthony Fok wrote: > ratt finds 89 packages with direct or indirect dependency on > golang-go.opencensus and is able to build all of them with > with golang-go.opencensus/0.24.0-1 smoothly with no hiccup. Clarification: Out of the 89 packages, 4 faile

Bug#1033442: unblock: golang-go.opencensus/0.24.0-1

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 3:33 PM Anthony Fok wrote: > [ Checklist ] > [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog > [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them > [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing Sorry, I forgot to actually attach the debdiff file. Atta

Bug#1033442: unblock: golang-go.opencensus/0.24.0-1

changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing unblock golang-go.opencensus/0.24.0-1 Thanks for your help! Cheers, Anthony Fok

Re: Upload of TeX Info 7.0.x to unstable?

Hi Hilmar and Sebastian, On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 2:24 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2023-01-25 23:17:54 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > Am 25.01.2023 um 22:08 teilte Sebastian Ramacher mit: > > > On 2023-01-24 09:23:26 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > > > > TeX Info version 7.0 was released last

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 1:30 PM Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > The package has been corrected with version 1.2.1-6 which has > been uploaded to experimental. > > Please let us know if we can proceed with the upload to unstable. Also > a binNMU rebuild of reverse dependencies would be required afterwards

Re: Podman 3.0 and Debian bullseye

Dear all, Would both podman 2 and podman 3 be a possibility? I.e., we could keep the existing "podman" package at 2.1.1, while creating a new "podman3" or "podman-3" package? This way, both the stable podman 2 and the new podman 3 can be released for Debian 11. The two packages will likely confli

Bug#853741: unblock: lilypond/2.18.2-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Please kindly unblock package lilypond. lilypond 2.18.2-4.1 was removed from testing (stretch) after its dependencies guile-1.8-libs and gui

Re: Bug#746005: Problems in Lilipond and Guile -- #746005

Control: severity -1 important On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > About a year later, Emilio states that the release team discussed this > problem and "wouldn't like to release Stretch with guile-1.8 just for > lilypond's sake": >

Bug#850527: unblock: frescobaldi/3.0.0~git20161001.0.eec60717+ds1-2

ends: lilypond" since LilyPond is not absolutely necessary for Frescobaldi to run, but moreover, to get Frescobaldi into Debian "stretch" (testing), i.e. the upcoming Debian 9.0 stable release, in case lilypond does not make it into "stretch". See http://bug

Please don't remove lilypond; a new version is awaiting confirmation

Hello, On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:51:27 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > # Package: lilypond (optional; Anthony Fok)remove lilypond/2.1.0-2 > # 250622 [ ] lilypond: FTBFS error: `gs' failed (status 139) > # no maintainer reaction > remove lilypond/2.1.0-2 > # revers