Re: Freeze Exception Request - open-build-service

Paul Gevers 於 2019年2月14日 週四 下午4:05寫道： > Both of which are also not in buster. So you are requesting an exception > for all three. > Yes. All three. > Why did you only fix this so late in the cycle? If the history I see is > correct, open-build-service has been out of testing since 2018-04-26.

Freeze Exception Request - open-build-service

Dear Release Team, We have open-build-service 2.9.4-1 uploaded last week. It used to needs 2 days to goes into Buster due to it contains a various CVE fixes. However it got blocked by two of it's build-deps: ruby-clockwork and ruby-jquery-ui-rails which we already fixed but needs more days to mig

Bug#824629: RM: ruby-rubinius-debugger/2.2.1-1

Hi pochu, Yes, I did file RM request both on release.debian.org and ftp.debian.org. You may close or merge this one if only file bug on ftp.debian.org is enough. Thanks, -Andrew 2016-05-18 16:02 GMT+08:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort : > On 18/05/16 09:57, Andrew Lee (李健秋) wrote: > >

Re: Please unblock scim-chewing

ntien warnings. Best regards, -Andrew 2012/7/6 Luk Claes : > On 07/05/2012 10:06 PM, Andrew Lee wrote: >> Dear release team, >> >> Please unblock scim-chewing 0.3.4-2 which has fixed a FTBFS problem >> #676009 without other changes. > > unblocked > > Cheers

Please unblock scim-chewing

Dear release team, Please unblock scim-chewing 0.3.4-2 which has fixed a FTBFS problem #676009 without other changes. Thanks, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Status of lxde

Dear RMs, What is the current situation/plan with lxde's transition to testing? People are asking me and I would feel better knowing what to look forward to. Best regards, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: Bug#575150: Work around does not work

Hi Martin, Thanks for the mail. Martin Bagge / brother wrote: > As people have confirmed that using the packages from Sid solves the > original issue I really think RM should consider to lift the ban to make > the transition happen. Yeah, use the packages from sid would solve this problem. That'

Re: Please hint lxde-common into testing

Philipp Kern wrote: > I suppose lxde-common without lxpanel doesn't make much sense? Apart from > that you could also denote the dependency with "[!kfreebsd-i386 > !kfreebsd-amd64]" until it's ported. This is a kludge, agreed, but a > simple unblock won't do. (It's either force-hinting the packa

Re: Please hint lxde-common into testing

Philipp Kern wrote: > | Binary Package: lxde-core (Version: 0.5.0-3) > | > | BTS entry: http://bugs.debian.org/lxde-core > | Relationships > | > | Package has a Depends on lxpanel (>= 0.4) which cannot be satisfied on > kfreebsd-amd64. > | Package has a Depends on lxpanel (>= 0.4) which cannot b

Please hint lxde-common into testing

Dear release team, The lxde-common package got blocked by _tasksel-meta-faux_ package. However I did a search, and cannot find any information about _tasksel-meta-faux_ package. Any idea? Details: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=lxde-common Move this package into testin

Re: Bits from the Release Team: What should go into squeeze?

Following Yves-Alexis to update the status on LXDE team. :) As we are just initialing to build a LXDE team for related packages. I expected we would make these works done faster and more smoothly. The lxsession 0.4.2 is pending for upload as lxsession 0.4.1 is still in sid and blocked lxde-commo

Please unblock lxlauncher for lenny

-matchbox.dpatch (Closes: #498601) Thanks to Enrico Zini for the patch. * Applied 03_scale-icons.dpatch to make different icons looks all in equal size. * Updated translations. (Closes: #509758) -- Andrew Lee Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:51:20 +0800 -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Please unblock lxsession-lite

. (Closes:#509767, #506201) Thanks to Andreas Henriksson and Peter De Wachter -- Andrew Lee Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:44:18 +0800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Please unblock lxrandr and lxterminal for lenny

lenny release. Here are the changlogs: lxrandr (0.1+svn20080716-3) unstable; urgency=low * Fixed a typo. (Closes: #492509) -- Andrew Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:54:59 +0800 lxrandr (0.1+svn20080716-2) unstable; urgency=low * Applied a patch to solve the LVDS output ca

Re: network-manager for laptop users who install desktop task as well.

Otavio Salvador wrote: > If we add it to laptop-desktop it will be installed in KDE too. What > is not what we want I guess. You are right, we shouldn't do it that way. I guess we may solve this problem by have an additional -laptop task for each current desktop tasks. eg: gnome-desktop-laptop, kd

network-manager for laptop users who install desktop task as well.

Dear folks, Otavio Salvador wrote: > This is somewhat complicate to decide. I see two sides in this > question: > > 1) adding Network Manager for LXDE we'll give a more ready to use > desktop for laptop users and give some extra bonus for regular users; > > 2) LXDE seems to fit very well with

Re: Bug#500119: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#500119: Better way to avoid both knetworkmanager and nm-applet are started in parallel

Hello Otavio, Otavio Salvador wrote: > This is somewhat complicate to decide. I see two sides in this > question: > > 1) adding Network Manager for LXDE we'll give a more ready to use > desktop for laptop users and give some extra bonus for regular users; > > 2) LXDE seems to fit very well wi

Re: Bug#500119: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#500119: Better way to avoid both knetworkmanager and nm-applet are started in parallel

Cc'ed this to debian-boot and debian-release. Dear RMs, This is only one line change in nm-applet.desktop which benefit other Window Managers and Desktops user. Please accept this change into Lenny. Michael Biebl wrote: > So the only change would be in nm-applet.desktop to NotShowIn=KDE. > I gue

Please unblock lxde-common for lenny.

Dear Release Managers, Please unblock lxde-common. It closes #493774 and added missing depends for on the lxde metapackage to provide a more functional lxde desktop. I think's more suitable for lenny release. Changes: lxde-common (0.3.2.1+svn20080509-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Added 'lock

Please unblock pcmanfm

Dear RMs, Please unblock pcmanfm, it fixed a RC(#499678) bug and #498794 for typo and #497494 added alternative x-terminal-emulator into default supported terminal list. pcmanfm (0.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Correct spellings, 03_correct_spelling.dpatch (Closes:498794) * Code in some

Re: Please unblock gpicview for security fix

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > > -4 was already unblocked, but you uploaded before it could move to > testing. New upstream release rejected, please reupload -4 as -4+lenny1 > to testing-proposed-updates. I have uploaded gpicview 0.1.9-4+lenny1 into testing-proposed-updates for 5 day. But I have

Re: Please unblock security fix

Dear Release Manager, Andrew Lee wrote: > Got it. I fixed these in my local repos already. I planed to upload > together with svn head(fix #497005) into sid after this went into lenny. Please consider to unblock gpicview 0.1.10, it's a bug fixes release from upstream, included all

Re: Bug#497408: gpicview to enter testing?

Thomas Viehmann wrote: > currently, there are conflicting hints for gpicview shown in the PTS. > If the gpicview from unstable enters testing, #497408 becomes obsolete > and can be closed. Okay. I am now closing #497408. Thanks, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: Please unblock security fix

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > +Standards-Version: 3.8.0.0 > > The last .0 is useless. > > +INSTALL = install > +INSTALL_FILE= $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m 644 > +INSTALL_PROGRAM = $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m 755 > +INSTALL_SCRIPT = $(INSTALL) -p-o root -g root -m

Please unblock security fix

Dear RM, Please unblock gpicview package which fixing following security issues: #495968 CVE-2008-3791 insecure temporary file usage #498022 CVE-2008-3904 arbitrary code execution via crafted file name Please also consider to bump the urgency. Thanks, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

[Fwd: Possible problems in your Debian packages]

Dear Release Managers, Following packages are both ready to enter lenny. Please add hints. === lxnm: = Not in testing for 36 days. If things don't change, it won't be part of lenny! See === lxpanel: = No migration to testing for 2

Re: Request binNMU for pcmanfm

Steve Langasek wrote: > I'm not content to do this without understanding what changed in gamin that > broke your package. gamin didn't have a /declared/ ABI change, so if this > is an ABI change in gamin, it's possible that there are other packages > affected and we may need to do a mass-fix. But

Request binNMU for pcmanfm

Release managers, I wrote this for request binNMU for the packages below: pcmanfm_0.3.2.2-1, Rebuild against newer libgamin-dev >= 0.1.8 (Closes:410929), 1, linux-any pcmanfm-nohal_0.3.2.2-1, Rebuild against newer libgamin-dev >= 0.1.8 (Closes:410929), 1, any Thanks. -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Please unblock pcmanfm

sfied Build-Depends on libhal-dev)" by Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes:#404050) [ Andrew Lee ] * Taken a entry from Enrico Zini's blog to README.Debian for how to replace nautilus with pcmanfm and provide genconf.sh -- Andrew Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Urgency] How to make libchewing & scim-chewing into Sarge?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Perrier wrote: | | Don't forget to report the needed bug against tasksel for this to | happen. Yes, I have filed a bug against tasksel[1] for this to happen. | | Of course, given that D-I and all related software are 100% | translated in Tradi